ILNews

Judges see more cases that involve veterans

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For a little more than a year, Grant Superior Judge Mark Spitzer has presided over his local drug court and has witnessed what he describes as remarkable results from the problem-solving court model.

But even with that success, the judge recognizes there's a need that isn't being met.

An increasing number of soldiers returning from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars are coming to court with a special set of problems, and Judge Spitzer wants to embrace a concept that's gaining steam throughout the country and is being considered by the Indiana General Assembly.

He's interested in the concept of veterans courts, which would operate much in the same way the state's drug, re-entry, and mental-health courts currently do, and pending expand the statutory framework to include the veterans court option.

"We're only going to see more and more of this as veterans come back from being deployed oversees and get tangled up in the criminal justice system," Judge Spitzer said. "Their issues are different from what you'd see on a regular drug and court docket or in a regular courtroom, and so we need to be in a position to address the issues that are causing this to happen."

Growing trend

About two million men and women have been deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan in the past decade. While there are no comprehensive statistics about how often veterans get into trouble with the law, the criminal justice system is being blanketed with veteran-specific issues more often. Psychiatrists and law enforcement officials agree that the traumas of combat can lead to addiction and criminality, and that's fueling the push for more specialized courts.

The first full-fledged specialty court like this came in New York in January 2008 when Buffalo City Judge Robert Russell opened a court aimed at keeping veterans who are nonviolent offenders out of jail. His program pairs veterans guilty of nonviolent felony or misdemeanor offenses with volunteer veteran mentors, requiring them to adhere to a strict schedule of rehabilitation programs and court appearances.

That judge's idea has since inspired about a dozen other communities nationwide to set up similar courts, which in turn prompted several states to pass or consider laws aimed at encouraging the creation of veterans courts. Congress is also considering legislation that would set up federal funding for these courts, as long as certain standards are met.

Indiana's interest

At the moment, Indiana has about 35 drug and re-entry courts that have a statutory framework and certification process, according to the Indiana Judicial Center. Indiana is unique because it certifies its state statute-established problemsolving courts, while other jurisdictions have standards but aren't implementing a certification process. To get certified, an interested court must go through a review process with the Indiana Judicial Center. The judge, court coordinator, and staff are interviewed, and then the state will determine if the applicant meets the requirements set out in Indiana Code §12-23-14.5. Facilities, personnel, fiscal and general management, and courtroom observation are all part of the process.

That's what the state is working to expand.

House Bill 1271 would not only add veterans courts to the mix but also allow for statutory teeth involving courts focused on domestic violence, family drug dependency, and local community issues, as well as any other areas the Indiana Judicial Center might later determine is necessary. Similar legislation proposed in 2009 failed, but this time it's passed the midway point of the legislative process. The full House voted unanimously to send it on, and the Senate Judiciary Committee was set to discuss the bill Feb. 17.

That's good news for jurists, attorneys, and veterans affairs advocates throughout the state who want to set up their own problem-solving courts to address these issues.

For Judge Spitzer in Grant County, he hopes the legislation allows him to create a separate court docket for veterans who are now merged into the drug court he's run since October 2008. Presiding over that court, the judge began noticing veterans appearing on his docket and more frequently saw post-traumatic stress or service-connected issues arise.

As a result, he began discussing options to address those litigants' issues with officials at the Veterans Administration Northern Indiana Health Care System - Marion campus; the court officially partnered with the hospital in May 2009. The hospital director sits in on the drug-court staffing meetings every Thursday to offer updates about what services have been offered and are available to veterans. Through the partnership, Judge Spitzer's court is able to hook litigants up with veteran benefits resources and vocational rehabilitation if needed. When someone first enters the local system, they are asked about any service history as a way to screen those who might be in need of those services, Judge Spitzer said.

"A lot of people just hadn't realized they had access to those services as veterans, and maybe that connection can keep them out of the criminal justice system down the road," he said.

Judge Spitzer hopes that attorneys will also more carefully screen clients, determining at the onset if they have any military service history and possibly using that to find a way to best assist someone.

Marion Superior Judge Jose Salinas is also interested in the idea, as his drug and re-entry court programs currently have about four people who have been weaved into that process. That court works with the Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center in Indianapolis to offer much of the same resources to litigant veterans that are available in Grant County. With the pending legislation, his court would be able to start a new docket specifically devoted to those cases, according to program coordinator Jeff Yanis. Case managers would likely be brought on if the funding was available, and having the statutory framework makes federal grant money more possible, he said.

In Porter County, Superior Judge Julia Jent is spearheading a local effort to establish a veterans court and is already working to setup that structure. That program is in its infancy but is growing stronger, said deputy prosecutor Adam Burroughs, who is assigned to the drug court and working on this initiative.

A VA services officer has started working in that county courthouse in the past year, and that person is now working with the court to weave veterans' issues into the drug court in which Judge Jent presides.

"We have a heavy population of young veterans here, and the things we're seeing once they return is quite disturbing," Burroughs said. "We're seeing men and women come back from deployment with these alcohol and drug issues that never would have allowed them to get into any form of public service before. They didn't leave us behaving this way, so something happened there.

"Hopefully, we can find out what's happening and find a way to help them before it's too late. We don't want to lose them in the public or private sector, or to prisons. ... We can save these people who've served their country. We owe them that."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Ah yes... Echoes of 1963 as a ghostly George Wallace makes his stand at the Schoolhouse door. We now know about the stand of personal belief over service to all constituents at the Carter County Clerk door. The results are the same, bigotry unable to follow the directions of the courts and the courts win. Interesting to watch the personal belief take a back seat rather than resign from a perception of local power to make the statement.

  2. An oath of office, does it override the conscience? That is the defense of overall soldier who violates higher laws, isnt it? "I was just following orders" and "I swore an oath of loyalty to der Fuhrer" etc. So this is an interesting case of swearing a false oath and then knowing that it was wrong and doing the right thing. Maybe they should chop her head off too like the "king's good servant-- but God's first" like St Thomas More. ...... We wont hold our breath waiting for the aclu or other "civil liberterians" to come to her defense since they are all arrayed on the gay side, to a man or should I say to a man and womyn?

  3. Perhaps we should also convene a panel of independent anthropological experts to study the issues surrounding this little-known branch of human sacrifice?

  4. I'm going to court the beginning of Oct. 2015 to establish visitation and request my daughters visits while she is in jail. I raised my grandchild for the first two and half years. She was born out of wedlock and the father and his adopted mother wantwd her aborted, they went as far as sueing my daughter for abortion money back 5mo. After my grandchild was born. Now because of depression and drug abuse my daughter lost custody 2 and a half years ago. Everyting went wrong in court when i went for custody my lawyer was thrown out and a replacment could only stay 45 min. The judge would not allow a postponement. So the father won. Now he is aleinating me and my daughter. No matter the amount of time spent getting help for my daughter and her doing better he runs her in the ground to the point of suicide because he wants her to be in a relationship with him. It is a sick game of using my grandchild as a pawn to make my daughter suffer for not wanting to be with him. I became the intervener in the case when my daughter first got into trouble. Because of this they gave me her visitation. Im hoping to get it again there is questions of abuse on his part and I want to make sure my grandchild is doing alright. I really dont understand how the parents have rights to walk in and do whatever they want when the refuse to stand up and raise the child at first . Why should it take two and a half years to decide you want to raise your child.The father used me so he could finish college get a job and stop paying support by getting custody. Support he was paying my daughter that I never saw.

  5. Pence said when he ordered the investigation that Indiana residents should be troubled by the allegations after the video went viral. Planned Parenthood has asked the government s top health scientists at the National Institutes of Health to convene a panel of independent experts to study the issues surrounding the little-known branch of medicine.

ADVERTISEMENT