The Indiana Judicial Conference unveiled its "roadmap for the future" today for the Indiana courts, which included
consolidating courts and creating a uniform system to select trial judges. At the Indiana Judicial Conference, Indiana Chief
Justice Randall T. Shepard discussed the long-term strategic plan's goals to improve the professionalism, efficiency,
and effectiveness of the state's judiciary.
After 15 meetings across Indiana beginning in December 2008, the Strategic Planning Committee produced the 27-page document as
a blueprint detailing the judiciary's vision for the future. The document isn't intended to be a detailed implementation
plan ready for adoption by the legislature, but is an aspiration and vision for the future.
Some areas identified for improvement include increasing CLE requirements for judges and developing minimum standards for
court staff; incorporating city, town, and township small claims courts into the trial courts; providing state funding for
courts and court-related services; and reducing the seven different methods of selecting trial court judges in the state to
a uniform system.
The plan calls for state funding of the trial courts in order to allocate resources fairly. Currently, the state pays for
some salaries and court programs and county councils pay for other salaries and programs. Figures aren't yet available
on the impact of funding changes.
Elkhart Circuit Judge Terry Shewmaker and Marion Superior Judge Mark Stoner are co-chairs of the Strategic Planning Committee.
They say Indiana's complex court system needs to be changed so that it's clear and easy for citizens to understand.
Duplication of efforts and inefficiencies that cost taxpayers money should be streamlined or eliminated.
Some aspects of the plan are ready to be implemented, including those dealing with education and training.














The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.