Justice David joins the Indiana Supreme Court

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

One word marked Justice Steven H. David’s beginning on the Indiana Supreme Court.

“Wow,” was his response in amazement, moments after being sworn as the state’s 106th justice and donning his high court robe for the first time.

That reaction marked not only the historic change in the court’s lineup for the first time in 11 years, but also reflected the humility and modesty displayed by the newly appointed Supreme Court justice who took the bench Oct. 18.

An estimated 230 people packed the ornate third-floor courtroom inside the Indiana Statehouse that day, culminating a process that begin in May when Justice Theodore R. Boehm announced he’d be retiring from the court. The summer narrowed the nearly three dozen applicants down to three and Gov. Mitch Daniels on Sept. 17 chose the Boone Circuit judge to take that spot.

David The current Indiana Supreme Court Justices applaud their newest member, Justice Steven David. (IL Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

The investiture ceremony signified his official start on the court, which would be only two days before hearing his first trio of oral arguments and his first appellate court conference behind closed doors. Fifteen years at the trial court level combined with experience in military law, as a corporate legal counsel, and in private practice led to that point and put him in a spot he said he’d never dreamed he would be in.

“Gov. Daniels, sir, what can I say to the person who picked me over so many qualified candidates to be number 106,” Justice David said, moments after the governor administered the judicial oath, he put on the new robe for the first time and took a seat on the bench. “I haven’t got the tattoo yet but I intend to get one. It’ll go right over the gavel I have now.”

As the investiture ceremony began, Justice David’s picture on the courtroom wall between Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard and Justice Robert D. Rucker was covered with a red curtain. Just as he walked out with his new colleagues for the first time, the curtain was removed to reveal his portrait now displayed.

When introducing those who’d speak about the new member, Chief Justice Shepard praised the merit-selection system that sets Indiana apart from many of its neighboring states that endure high-dollar and contentious judicial elections.

The governor pointed to the new justice’s extensive experience at the trial court level, corporate experience with Mayflower, private practice in Columbus, and his longtime service as a U.S. Army colonel and judge advocate general who’d represented detainees at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Nashville attorney James Reichert, who served as vice president of legal for Mayflower back when Justice David worked there, talked about his friend and colleague’s passion for running and his love for family, the latter being a true measure of the man and jurist. The story that the new justice had donated a kidney to his critically ill niece 16 years ago was a surprise to some the audience.

Justice David, who grew up in Bartholomew County, spoke of wanting to be a lawyer since he was a little boy, a desire to be on the bench since his first day of law school at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis, and that now having his own chambers with an engraved “Justice David” nameplate inside the Indiana Statehouse is beyond what he’d ever dreamed.

Justice David described his judicial philosophy as being one of humility, respect, fairness, and the rule of law. He also mentioned his love for family and juvenile cases and praised the civility and professionalism that the Supreme Court has demonstrated through the years.

“Every day I will do the best I can,” Justice David said, vowing to have respect for the executive and legislative branches and to always fight to protect the Indiana Constitution. “I have no agenda. I am not an ‘R’, I am not a ‘D’, I am not an ‘I’. I owe no one anything.”

But while marking some of the serious notes of the historic event, the ceremony clearly brought out the new justice’s lighter side, with Justice David himself and his friends and colleagues offering laughter, wit, and humor at every turn.

Citing his love for music lyrics and history, Justice David gave a speech that included references to Abraham Lincoln, Oliver Wendell Holmes, and country singers Kenny Chesney, Lee Brice, and Toby Keith. He used those musical references to note how he wanted to be a part of the solution, and how he hadn’t gotten to this point alone.

He also touched on what he described as the “elephant in the room,” about Justice Boehm being a man praised by many for his intellect. The new justice told a story about a law school professor of his who also knows Boehm, and said that while the former justice is “the smartest man she knows,” Justice David was a “memorable student.”

That brought laughter from everyone in the room, from those in the audience to the other justices on the bench.

“Now, the whole world knows what I’ve known for so long – that he has a wonderful sense of humor,” said former Indiana State Bar Association president and Columbus attorney Richard Eynon, whom Justice David clerked for while in law school and went to work for as a young attorney after graduation. “He’s not a clown or a jester, but he has within himself a way of making people very comfortable by creating laughter and lightening things up, all while being serious and always committed to the rule of law.”

Attending the investiture, Eynon took comfort in seeing something that he’s never before witnessed – all five justices on the bench laughing together and having fun. He described his former law clerk as being 100 percent unique, and that Indiana likely won’t ever see another justice with those same experiences and qualifications and personality.

“He’s not there to change the court, but yes, I think they’ll take his qualities and all of his experiences and change as a result of that,” Eynon said. “That’s a healthy jolt for the Supreme Court, and it’s a difference and change he’s already making. I think all lawyers in the state who listened or watched that investiture are smiling and saying, ‘Yes, this is a man who will represent all of us without failure.’”•


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. I think the cops are doing a great job locking up criminals. The Murder rates in the inner cities are skyrocketing and you think that too any people are being incarcerated. Maybe we need to lock up more of them. We have the ACLU, BLM, NAACP, Civil right Division of the DOJ, the innocent Project etc. We have court system with an appeal process that can go on for years, with attorneys supplied by the government. I'm confused as to how that translates into the idea that the defendants are not being represented properly. Maybe the attorneys need to do more Pro-Bono work

  2. We do not have 10% of our population (which would mean about 32 million) incarcerated. It's closer to 2%.

  3. If a class action suit or other manner of retribution is possible, count me in. I have email and voicemail from the man. He colluded with opposing counsel, I am certain. My case was damaged so severely it nearly lost me everything and I am still paying dearly.

  4. There's probably a lot of blame that can be cast around for Indiana Tech's abysmal bar passage rate this last February. The folks who decided that Indiana, a state with roughly 16,000 to 18,000 attorneys, needs a fifth law school need to question the motives that drove their support of this project. Others, who have been "strong supporters" of the law school, should likewise ask themselves why they believe this institution should be supported. Is it because it fills some real need in the state? Or is it, instead, nothing more than a resume builder for those who teach there part-time? And others who make excuses for the students' poor performance, especially those who offer nothing more than conspiracy theories to back up their claims--who are they helping? What evidence do they have to support their posturing? Ultimately, though, like most everything in life, whether one succeeds or fails is entirely within one's own hands. At least one student from Indiana Tech proved this when he/she took and passed the February bar. A second Indiana Tech student proved this when they took the bar in another state and passed. As for the remaining 9 who took the bar and didn't pass (apparently, one of the students successfully appealed his/her original score), it's now up to them (and nobody else) to ensure that they pass on their second attempt. These folks should feel no shame; many currently successful practicing attorneys failed the bar exam on their first try. These same attorneys picked themselves up, dusted themselves off, and got back to the rigorous study needed to ensure they would pass on their second go 'round. This is what the Indiana Tech students who didn't pass the first time need to do. Of course, none of this answers such questions as whether Indiana Tech should be accredited by the ABA, whether the school should keep its doors open, or, most importantly, whether it should have even opened its doors in the first place. Those who promoted the idea of a fifth law school in Indiana need to do a lot of soul-searching regarding their decisions. These same people should never be allowed, again, to have a say about the future of legal education in this state or anywhere else. Indiana already has four law schools. That's probably one more than it really needs. But it's more than enough.

  5. This man Steve Hubbard goes on any online post or forum he can find and tries to push his company. He said court reporters would be obsolete a few years ago, yet here we are. How does he have time to search out every single post about court reporters and even spy in private court reporting forums if his company is so successful???? Dude, get a life. And back to what this post was about, I agree that some national firms cause a huge problem.