ILNews

Justices accept 2 cases

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer to two cases, including one involving the validity of a search warrant.

In Kenny D. Lee v. State of Indiana, No. 71S03-1202-CR-67, Kenny Lee appealed his conviction of Class A felony possession of cocaine, which the Indiana Court of Appeals overturned in November 2011. The appellate court ruled that police did not have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop of Lee. Police had set up surveillance of a house in order to secure it prior to executing a search warrant and saw Lee leave the home and drive away. Police followed him, initiated the traffic stop, and later searched the residence where Lee came from and found drugs. The COA also held that the state didn’t provide evidence of additional circumstances where a trier-of-fact would infer Lee knew about the drugs in the home or had the ability to control the drugs.

The justices also took Quanardel Wells v. State of Indiana, No. 49S05-1202-CR-68, in which the Court of Appeals in a not-for-publication decision affirmed on interlocutory appeal the denial of Quanardel Wells’ motion to sever the offenses for separate trials with respect to each victim. Wells was charged in an 11-count information with five counts of Class A felony criminal deviate conduct, one count of Class A felony rape, three counts of criminal confinement – one as a Class B felony and two as Class C felonies – and Class D felonies strangulation and intimidation. The charges involved offenses committed at different times against four separate victims.

The Supreme Court also denied transfer to eight cases for the week ending Feb. 3.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Indianapolis Bar Association President John Trimble and I are on the same page, but it is a very large page with plenty of room for others to join us. As my final Res Gestae article will express in more detail in a few days, the Great Recession hastened a fundamental and permanent sea change for the global legal service profession. Every state bar is facing the same existential questions that thrust the medical profession into national healthcare reform debates. The bench, bar, and law schools must comprehensively reconsider how we define the practice of law and what it means to access justice. If the three principals of the legal service profession do not recast the vision of their roles and responsibilities soon, the marketplace will dictate those roles and responsibilities without regard for the public interests that the legal profession professes to serve.

  2. I have met some highly placed bureaucrats who vehemently disagree, Mr. Smith. This is not your father's time in America. Some ideas are just too politically incorrect too allow spoken, says those who watch over us for the good of their concept of order.

  3. Lets talk about this without forgetting that Lawyers, too, have FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION

  4. Baer filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit on April 30 2015. When will this be decided? How many more appeals does this guy have? Unbelievable this is dragging on like this.

  5. They ruled there is no absolute right to keep a license, whether it be for a lifetime or a short period of time. So with that being said, this state taught me at the age of 15 how to obtain that license. I am actually doing something that I was taught to do, I'm not breaking the law breaking the rules and according to the Interstate Compact the National Interstate Compact...driving while suspended is a minor offense. So, do with that what you will..Indiana sucks when it comes to the driving laws, they really and truly need to reevaluate their priorities and honestly put the good of the community first... I mean, what's more important the pedophile drug dealer or wasting time and money to keep us off the streets?

ADVERTISEMENT