ILNews

Justices deny transfer to child custody case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A divided Indiana Supreme Court has denied transfer to a Clark County custody case, though two justices suggested transfer was warranted because the Indiana Court of Appeals improperly reweighed evidence to reach its September decision.

While the majority voted to deny transfer to Carl Wayne Montgomery v. Patricia Ann Montgomery, 10A01-1511-DR-1910, in a dissenting opinion handed down in a Thursday order, Justice Steve David, joined by Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is not permissible at the appellate level.

“It is not enough that the evidence might have supported a different conclusion; to reverse the trial court, the evidence must lead to but one conclusion,” David wrote.

In its September decision, the Court of Appeals reversed a Clark Circuit Court decision to modify a custody order placing A.M. in the primary physical custody of her mother, Patricia Montgomery. A.M. had previously been in the custody of her father, Carl Montgomery, who accused his ex-wife’s boyfriend of repeatedly abusing A.M.

In its reversal, the appellate court wrote that although there was evidence that Carl Montgomery had attempted to interfere with Patricia Montgomery’s parenting time, such interference did not warrant the revocation of the father’s primary physical custody of A.M. But in the dissent, David wrote that the Clark Circuit Court’s finding that Carl Montgomery was attempting to interfere with his ex-wife’s parenting time was supported by the facts presented to the trial court, thus warranting the modification of the custody agreement in Patricia Montgomery’s favor.

Specifically, David wrote that Carl Montgomery’s allegations about abuse at the hands of Patricia Montgomery’s new boyfriend were fabrications that he repeated three times during court proceedings and that as a result of those allegations, A.M. missed at least five weeks of parenting time with her mother in 2013.

Further, because it is in a child’s best interest to have significant time with both of their parents and because one parent’s continual interference with the other’s parenting time can establish a substantial change in the parties’ interrelationship, a modification of the custody order to award Patricia Montgomery primary physical custody of her daughter was warranted, David wrote.

“The evidence here supports a finding that Father deliberately tried to interfere with Mother’s parenting time and successfully frustrated her attempts to exercise parenting time with A.M., thus a substantial change occurred,” the justice said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • First Helpdesk Call
    Yeah, you are so spot on. 'If it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck!' I can't believe how many frauds we have in the Justice system. I was raised to believe in the honesty of the Courts, I was so misguided and blinded by all of this. I guess, that is why I am having a very hard time processing and accepting the outcome in my case. When my employer hired me, he hired me to do my job to my best ability, to follow the Employee handbook rules and if I don't, guess what? I am fired. Isn't that supposed to happen when a Judge or Justices do not follow their job description? Should be held accountable? In my Appeal case, Chief Judge Vaidik, Judge Barnes and Judge Mathias re weighed the evidence, which is not allowed in the appeallant court, but they did and nobody has the guts to call them out except for Justices David and Rush. The other Justices probably didn't bother reading my file, "Oh, another mother who is whining about losing custody" Next.... How does one accept a ruling when the appeals court judges blatantly went against the rules, and caused an innocent child, whom is the victim in this whole thing, has now been used as a pawn. I pray for the parent who walks into the family court and thinks they will have a fair hearing, have faith in the judges, and attorneys. Just because they are honest, law abiding and believe in God, thinking everyone is like them.... What a mistake.....
  • not quite at its best
    OK, but realize that corruption affecting family law is at its "best,", that is its very worst, when found among the highest judicial officials ... as when the highest officials of a state and their pages are found to be Jesters. See below, the New York judge and his little Smithers, for example. Other examples from books of play might be found ... but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, so who can be certain short of public disclosure? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXjJxKBxMss
    • Corruption X2
      Of course, its the elite club. Its funny, I contacted Gov Pence's office regarding my situation. I was informed, "Gov Pence does not get involved with family law matters." LOL there is your answer. ELITE corruption at its best....
      • More fun and games for the neopagan elite
        nternet journalist Sandy Frost has been investigating this offshoot group of the Shriners for nearly 5 years. "The jesters are generally made up of judges, people in law enforcement, sheriffs and people in power," Frost said. According to an Indiana court document, there are 191 groups or courts in North America with nearly 21-thousand members. ... As Eyewitness News first exclusively reported, Congressman Gus Bilirakis gave campaign funds to a group called the "Royal Order of Jesters" Tampa Chapter for dues and an event registration. In a sworn federal document, the FBI says the Jesters parties or "books of the play" generally include prostitutes who perform commercial sex acts on members.... Over the last several years, there have been major issues with jester groups around the country, but none of them have been tied to Congressman Bilirakis. A former tour operator is facing a lawsuit and criminal investigations in both the U.S. and Brazil. He's accused of soliciting under-aged prostitutes on fishing trips to Brazil, but denies the charges. In a prior suit, he was accused taking 19 jesters on one of those trips. Also, 3 jesters were caught in a human trafficking sting for taking an undocumented illegal alien to be a sex slave at a jester party in Kentucky. Those jesters include a former New York state Supreme Court judge, his law clerk and a retired police captain. While only a handful of jesters have been successfully prosecuted, in one of those cases, the FBI stated the jesters nationally have the motto "mirth is king" and engage in social gatherings known as "books of play". http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Florida-Congressman-174484421.html
      • Corruption
        Ms Montgomery, see my hot tip hear, note the crickets that followed: http://www.theindianalawyer.com/human-trafficking-rising-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/42468 When one of the nation's leading child sex enabling rings is in Indy, with the Hoosier elite involved, one cannot expect justice for children or the truth tellers to be at the forefront. Silence is the gold standard when the elite are corrupted.
        • Not shocked
          @ bryan, yes i understand what u are getting at. Satan is walking and breathing among us. I am very fortunate that i have the good lord on my side and i pray that he will keep shining his love down on me and to watch over my daughter. All of this happened by mans greed and they will have to explain to god one day why they chose satans way and not his. Thank u mr. Brown for answering my question. Take care Patricia
          • Explanation here
            Mrs Montgomery, I identify with your pain. The Indiana court system is the font of much injustice, and it seems that most in that system glory in the injustice. Sad to see that VP/Gov Pence put such one on the court at the last opening. We can hope and pray that the pending appointment is not business as usual in Indiana's good old boy system. As I have documented in my cases since 2007, in other disciplinary cases, and blatantly in your case, this clip is not far off ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c1IqjsWsWE
          • WHY THEN?
            If the appeals court came to the decision based upon of reweighing the evidence, then why isn't anyone doing something about it? They blantaley disrespected the principal of the rules and yet, nobody is doing anything about it. SO, you guys are just going to allow it to continue? I don't get it. But if it doesn't effect their personal lives, who cares.... You can explain to my daughter why she was removed from a loving and safe home and returned to a father who only wants her to get back at her mother.... my daughters best interest doesn't matter to you guys. I do have a question, the three justices that denied my request for a transfer, do you have children? If you do, how do you sleep at night? Are they safe and you don't have to worry about them? If so, you are really lucky.... I don't have that luxury anymore...
            • ???
              Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"
            • a confused little girl
              Well things are back to the way they were when the father had custody. No real phone calls. She won't be able to have contact with her mothers side of relatives. No phone calls, cards or presents in the mail. No knowledge where to send them. This little girl is so confused of what to do or say to her mother. I'm sure if this was someone in the judges family, none of us would be writing these comments.
            • Link repair
              From my post below .... I cut and pasted in error: http://www.theindianalawyer.com/human-trafficking-rising-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/42468
            • Needs Published
              What a disgrace of Judicial Proceedings. Can complain and write comments forever but someone needs to show the mother how to fight back before he turns this little girl against her.
            • justices deny custody
              The truth comes out Issac Law Firm for Men helped Montgomery to get custody.Should read the lies he told them.How much was paid to the judges?
            • Royalty Hoosier style
              Some are above the law in Indiana. Some lined up with Lodges have controlled power in the state since the 1920s when the Klan ruled Indiana. Consider the comments at this post and note the international h.q. in Indianapolis. http://www.theindianalawyer.com/human-trafficking-rising-in-indiana/PARAMS/article/42468. Brave journalists need to take this child torturing, above the law and antimarriage cult on just like The Globe courageously took on Cardinal Law. Are there any brave Hoosier journalists?
            • Still Pitiful
              His brother was a former prosecuting attorney for Crawford County, disiplined for stealing law books after his term, and embezzeling funds from family and clients. Highly functional family great morals and values...
              • Any insights
                Wondering if the father was a Lodge member?
              • Rank X2
                @BryanJBrown, You are totally correct. I have no words, you nailed it.....
              • Rank
                Historically speaking pagans devalue children and worship animals. How close are we? Consider the ruling above plus today's tidbit from the politically correct high Court: http://indianacourts.us/times/2016/12/are-you-asking-the-right-questions-intimate-partner-violence-and-pet-abuse/
                • Amen x2
                  @ President Snow, like they really read these comments or have the GUTS to show what is the right thing to do. They are just worrying about planning the next retirement party, the others JUST DO NOT CARE about what is right. Its the Good Ol'Boys - they do not care about the rights of the mother or child, they just care about their next vote, which, from what I gather, the mother left the state of Indiana because of the domestic violence that was going on through out the marriage, the father had three restraining orders on him from three different women, but yet, the COA judges sent a strong message, go ahead men put your women in place, do what you have to do, you have our backs... I just wish the REAL truth could be told about this situation... Please pray for this child and mother that God will some how make things right and send a miracle from above.
                  • Amen
                    Great questions to six jurists. The legislature should open a probe to investigate possible government corruption. Cj rush has shown courage as has justice Steven David. Who stands with them?
                    • How Can it Be?
                      Can someone please explain why Judge Barnes, Judge Mathias and Chief Judge Vaidik thought it was OK to re weigh the evidence blatantly knowing that by doing so was against the rules and went ahead and voted in favor of the father? I would love to ask them WHY??? I would also like to ask the three Supreme Justices why they thought it was OK too.
                      • Miscarriage of Justice
                        Father's rights? What about a mothers rights? A child's rights? Taking a child from the custody of the mother for political reasons! A miscarriage of justice! What about the welfare of the child? Has anyone considered parent alienation, the father can't erase the mother from the child's life. This child loves the mother and the home in Wisconsin, friends, school and family. It is apparent the father hates his ex-wife more than he loves his child! I hope there will be a Guardian Ad Litem, who will spend time with and get to know the child, BEFORE being brainwashed by the father. This is not just a child! A little person with rights and real needs, a stable home and a parent that cares enough to let this child at least finish the school year, where she is happy and comfortable! Where is the justice?
                      • Child Suffers
                        I am extremely disappointed that the State of Indiana decided to look the other way on what is very much a case of father rights vs child safety. It seems that the only person the Appeals Court was looking out for was Mr. Montgomery and unfortunately he was only trying to get back at his ex wife by taking their daughter away from her. I am sad that the child was used as a pawn and he was shown that he could get his way with force and unjust tactics. The child will only end up suffering in the long run. Indiana definitely did not have her best interests in mind.
                      • Interesting but
                        Those facts are consequential, and I am very sad for that child and mother, but the real story here is found in the first two posts below. The trial court found facts, the appellate court then improperly re-weighed those facts and went the opposite direction. Two of five Supremes rightly blew the whistle on that gross violation of due process. Three of five Supremes closed their eyes to the due process violation, putting a child at risk, refusing to back the trial court, and sending a message to the judicial system that corruption of due process is a-ok in the Hoosier judiciary ... in other words ... "Yes, we have some new blood on the high court, but we are still running the same good old boy plays that we have for decades. Favored sons approach, the disfavored are dismissed."
                      • Courts need to put child's welfare first.
                        I am concerned with the influence of Father’s Rights Groups in the State of Indiana. Presently, courts seem to be giving leniency to fathers. If a father requests visitations, the court appears to grant the requests, regardless of any concerns for the safety and welfare of the child, or consider whether the father has contributed financially to the support of the child. If a father does not request visitations, there is no accountability. Fathers are never in contempt of court for not fulfilling their obligations of parenting time or forced to comply with missed visits. The courts appear to punish mothers severely if any parenting time is not given to the father, even when justified. It has always been my understanding that courts should always put the child’s best interest first, and the courts should always consider which parent will be most reliable/likely to follow parent guidelines. Important facts documented in this case: 1. There are documented incidents of Carl Montgomery and domestic abuse. A protective order was filed and on record in another state. 2. There are documented contempt of courts against Carl Montgomery for falsifying child abuse; withholding medical and education information of the child from mother; denying visitations; and refusing to cooperate during mediation. 3. The child has displayed progress socially, emotionally and academically in the custody of the Mother . It is unhealthy to uproot a child during the middle of a school year, and not in the best interest of the child. 4. The courts have jeopardized the safety and welfare of the child by denying the appeal and ignoring the serious wrongdoings of the father. 5. Removing a little girl from the stable and loving home of the mother will cause emotional trauma. The child will also be denied interaction with the extended family: maternal grandfather, aunts, sisters, and cousins. In reviewing all the past court cases on file regarding this custody dispute, I am disappointed (appalled) at the court decisions made, and feel it is unfortunate that the Mother has to continuously fight for her parenting rights. When Fathers become intent on winning and see custody as a competition, the child is the one who loses.
                      • Can Happen to Any Parent
                        A parent can make false allegations against the other with out providing factual evidence and still prevail? This case will open up a whole new window of opportunity for the malicious and narcissistic parent just to get back at the other. I feel sorry for ALL parents who are battling false allegations or parent alienation against the other, hopefully, if their case goes in front of the Courts Of Appeals, they won't have the same out come. If I do not comply with my job requirements and fail to do my job as my employer has hired me to do, guess what? I get fired. I guess they have the GOD complex, they can do what they want , when they want and never suffer the consequences. I am sure when this child is older, becomes an adult, lets pray they do not end up in prison because this child is going to be used as a pawn by their father for the rest of their life as long as the community stands by and does nothing to stop parents like this father from destroying the child's relationship with their mother.
                      • Justices deny transfer
                        And how was it that the father bragged about a certain Appeals Court lady judge would rule in favor from the beginning??? Please email me lanag47129@yahoo.com if you want the real truth. Justice was not served.
                      • I Do Not Get It
                        So, let me understand this... Only two Justices admitted that the Appeals Court did not do their job and now this poor little child has to go through the emotional toll of going back to the father? Where were the other three? Oh that's right, they were planning a retirement party. The mother did not even get a fair Appeals Hearing and that is OK? The Justice's are OK with that? They do not care about the child's well being, I was under the impression Indiana was always looking out for the best interest of their future. This poor child, this poor mother, where was her due process? I just do not get it.... NOBODY is going to try and make this right? Just put a stamp on it, file it away and forget about the innocent child.... No wonder people have lost all respect for the Justice System.
                      • Troubling times three
                        So two justices can conclude, from the record, that "the Court of Appeals engaged in impermissible reweighing of evidence" revealing, on the bare naked record "a significant departure from accepted law" ... YET ONLY TWO JUSTICES find that such a troubling record "warrants review by the {Supreme] Court." The three other Justices do not argue that such a legal conclusion is unwarranted -- they rather, seemingly, have no problem with the departure from the due process of law. I would guess that the end is right, so the means just matters not? Or is it rather than in Indiana due process of the law means nearly nothing, perhaps departure from it in the Indiana courts is so very common that three justices could not even marshal more than an uninterested yawn in response? Troubling, very troubling.

                        Post a comment to this story

                        COMMENTS POLICY
                        We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
                         
                        You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
                         
                        Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in Indiana Lawyer editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
                         
                        No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
                         
                        We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
                         

                        Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

                        Sponsored by
                        ADVERTISEMENT
                        Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
                        1. Unlike the federal judge who refused to protect me, the Virginia State Bar gave me a hearing. After the hearing, the Virginia State Bar refused to discipline me. VSB said that attacking me with the court ADA coordinator had, " all the grace and charm of a drive-by shooting." One does wonder why the VSB was able to have a hearing and come to that conclusion, but the federal judge in Indiana slammed the door of the courthouse in my face.

                        2. what a wonderful world we are living, i still doubt this spell caster how he did it!!! i am Shechan Caroline am from Los Angeles I am so happy to let the whole word know how this powerful spell caster saved my marriage.Everything was going down the drain as my husband can not stop cheating on me with other women. It became used to always heating on me. I tried to make him stop, but I couldn't help the situation, the more I tried, the harder it becomes. At times we will fight and go apart for some months and we will come back again just because of our kids. One day a friend told me about this spell caster who helped her too, his name is Dr.oku, she said he uses white magic spells to solve spiritual problems. I decided to give it a try, I contacted him and he told me it will take just 2 to 3 days and I will see great changes in my husband. He actually cast a spell, believe me after 2 to 3 days of the spell, my husband was confessing different names of woman he has slept with. He begged for forgiveness and never to try it again. From that day till now, my mind is at rest. My husband dislike every other women on earth except me. And am so happy to have him for myself alone.The spell caster’s contact is okutemple@gmail.com or add him on whasapp +2347053113465?

                        3. I agree. My husband has almost the exact same situation. Age states and all.

                        4. Thanks Jim. We surprised ourselves with the first album, so we did a second one. We are releasing it 6/30/17 at the HiFi. The reviews so far are amazing! www.itsjustcraig.com Skope Mag: It’s Just Craig offers a warm intimacy with the tender folk of “Dark Corners”. Rather lovely in execution, It’s Just Craig opts for a full, rich sound. Quite ornate instrumentally, the songs unfurl with such grace and style. Everything about the album feels real and fully lived. By far the highlight of the album are the soft smooth reassuring vocals whose highly articulate lyrics have a dreamy quality to them. Stories emerge out of these small snapshots of reflective moments.... A wide variety of styles are utilized, with folk anchoring it but allowing for chamber pop, soundtrack work, and found electronics filtering their way into the mix. Without a word, It’s Just Craig sets the tone of the album with the warble of “Intro”. From there things get truly started with the hush of “Go”. Building up into a great structure, “Go” has a kindness to it. Organs glisten in the distance on the fragile textures of “Alone” whose light melody adds to the song’s gorgeousness. A wonderful bloom of color defines the spaciousness of “Captain”. Infectious grooves take hold on the otherworldly origins of “Goodnight” with precise drum work giving the song a jazzy feeling. Hazy to its very core is the tragedy of “Leaving Now”. By far the highlight of the album comes with the closing impassioned “Thirty-Nine” where many layers of sound work together possessing a poetic quality.

                        5. what a wonderful world we are living, i still doubt this spell caster how he did it!!! i am Tamara Barrow am from USA I am so happy to let the whole word know how this powerful spell caster saved my marriage.Everything was going down the drain as my husband can not stop cheating on me with other women. It became used to always heating on me. I tried to make him stop, but I couldn't help the situation, the more I tried, the harder it becomes. At times we will fight and go apart for some months and we will come back again just because of our kids. One day a friend told me about this spell caster who helped her too, his name is Dr.voodoo, she said he uses white magic spells to solve spiritual problems. I decided to give it a try, I contacted him and he told me it will take just 2 to 3 days and I will see great changes in my husband. He actually cast a spell, believe me after 2 to 3 days of the spell, my husband was confessing different names of woman he has slept with. He begged for forgiveness and never to try it again. From that day till now, my mind is at rest. My husband dislike every other women on earth except me. And am so happy to have him for myself alone.The spell caster’s contact his email at: voodoospelltemple66@gmail.com visit his website on http://drvodoospelltemple.webs.com

                        ADVERTISEMENT