March 28, 2013
Dave StaffordA modest increase requested over the next two budget cycles won’t include technical upgrades to allow webcasts of traveling
Court of Appeals oral arguments, Chief Judge Margret Robb told the Senate Appropriations Committee on Thursday.
More
September 4, 2012
IL StaffA Massachusetts man who pleaded guilty to rape and abuse of a child in that state in 1984 will argue before the Indiana Court
of Appeals Wednesday that he should not have to register in Indiana, where he now lives.
More
April 12, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments at Valparaiso University Law School in a rape case.
More
February 3, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will travel to a southern Indiana high school to hear a civil case involving First Amendment
claims for a police officer’s private statements.
More
December 2, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Paul K. Ogden v. Robertson et. al. at 2 p.m. EST Dec. 6 at Rensselaer
Central High School, 1106 E. Grace St.
More
November 28, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Christopher Bryant v. State of Indiana Tuesday at Lawrence North
High School in Indianapolis.
More
October 14, 2011
IL StaffIndiana Court of Appeals judges Melissa May, Michael Barnes and Terry Crone will hear a convicted murderer’s appeal
for post-conviction relief at Oakland City University Oct. 19.
More
October 4, 2011
IL StaffA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will travel to northern Indiana Thursday to hear the appeal of a man convicted
of attempted murder.
More
September 30, 2011
IL StaffTwo panels from the Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments at universities in southern Indiana next week.
More
July 8, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Carrie Chapman v. Howard L. Chapman and Elizabeth W. Chapman,
Trustees of The Stephen L. Chapman Irrevocable Trust Agreement, No. 02A03-1012-TR-624, at 10:30 a.m. July 12 at the Allen
County Courthouse in Ft. Wayne.
More
June 21, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Cynthia Welch v. Shawn Young, et al., at 2:30 p.m. June 23 at
Indiana State University’s Tirey Hall, Tilson Auditorium. Judges John G. Baker, Edward W. Najam, Jr., and Melissa S.
May will hear the case before a group of teenagers participating in Hoosier Girls State.
More
June 14, 2011
IL StaffA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will hear arguments in a contempt of court case Wednesday in northeast Indiana.
More
May 20, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear oral argument in An-Hung Yao v. State of Indiana and Yu-Ting Lin v. State
of Indiana at 12:30 p.m. (CDT) May 25, 2011, at Merrillville High School in the Freshman Center Lecture Hall. A panel
of judges consisting of Chief Judge Margret G. Robb, Judge Michael P. Barnes, and Judge Terry A. Crone will hear the case
on appeal from Huntington Circuit Court.
More
April 28, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Wabash Friday to hear arguments in an insurance case.
More
April 19, 2011
IL StaffThe Court of Appeals of Indiana will visit two Ivy Tech campuses Thursday to hear arguments in an insurance case and battery
case.
More
April 15, 2011
IL StaffOn Tuesday, two panels of Indiana Court of Appeals judges will travel north to hear arguments.
More
April 13, 2011
IL StaffA panel of judges from the Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Franklin Friday to hear arguments in the interlocutory appeal
of a man who’s charged with not registering as a sex offender.
More
April 1, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will be in Evansville April 4 to hear an appeal regarding methamphetamine convictions.
More
March 30, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments Thursday at Indiana University – South Bend.
More
March 24, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to Valparaiso University Monday to hear oral arguments in a criminal case.
More
March 21, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to LaPorte High School Tuesday to hear arguments in an insurance case.
More
March 18, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals of Indiana will hear oral arguments on an appeal regarding a defendant’s conviction of
Class D felony sexual battery March 24 at 11 a.m. at Indiana State University’s Hulman Memorial Student Union.
More
March 14, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will visit Pike High School in Indianapolis this week to hear arguments in a case in which a
man appeals his drug dealing conviction.
More
March 7, 2011
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to southern Indiana Wednesday to hear arguments in a case involving credit time.
More
December 9, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals hits the road Friday to visit Hamilton Southeastern High School in Fishers for oral arguments
in an interlocutory appeal involving the denial of a motion to suppress.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.