Attorney discipline
Disciplinary Actions - 12/8/10
December 8, 2010
Read who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 11/24/10
November 24, 2010
See who's been disbarred, suspended, or resigned.
MoreJustices disbar attorney
November 12, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court chose to disbar a Marion County attorney due to his pattern of neglect in clients’ cases.
MoreNew advertising rule on law firm monikers sparks concern
November 10, 2010
Michael HoskinsNew attorney advertising rules adopted recently by the Indiana Supreme Court have some lawyers throughout the state worried
that they’re being forced to change their law firm names from what’s historically been allowed.
MoreBrizzi disciplinary case delayed again
November 10, 2010
Michael HoskinsBy the time Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi faces a disciplinary hearing on alleged misconduct about how he publicly
discussed pending cases, he’ll have finished his term and will no longer be prosecutor in the state’s largest
county.
MoreAgency wants one-year suspension
November 10, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court’s Disciplinary Commission argues that a hearing officer’s recommendation of a public
reprimand against Delaware County Prosecutor Mark McKinney is inadequate and the elected official should receive a one-year
suspension.
MoreDiscipline case poses questions on recusals, separation of powers
October 13, 2010
Michael HoskinsDelaware County Prosecutor Mark McKinney should be publicly reprimanded for violating four professional conduct rules in his
handling of civil forfeiture matters as a private attorney while simultaneously prosecuting those same criminal defendants,
according to a hearing officer the Indiana Supreme Court appointed to examine disciplinary charges against the prosecutor.
MoreDisciplinary Actions -10/13/10
October 13, 2010
IL StaffRead who's been suspended or publicly reprimanded.
MoreJustices disagree on prosecutor's public reprimand
October 5, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has publicly reprimanded a lawyer for what happened to his license when he left private practice
to become a full-time prosecutor in northwest Indiana, but the disciplinary action has split the state’s justices on
whether a more severe punishment was warranted.
MoreHearing officer: prosecutor should get public reprimand
October 4, 2010
Michael HoskinsDelaware County Prosecutor Mark McKinney should be publicly reprimanded for violating four professional conduct rules in his
handling of civil forfeiture matters as a private attorney while simultaneously prosecuting those same criminal defendants,
according to hearing officer appointed by the Indiana Supreme Court.
MoreAttorney found guilty but mentally ill in attack
September 16, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA Hamilton County jury found an attorney guilty but mentally ill on the five counts he faced following his attack on a state
representative nearly a year ago.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 9/15/10
September 15, 2010
IL StaffRead who's been suspended and reinstated to the practice of law.
MoreJustices warn Indiana, out-of-state attorneys
September 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has a warning for attorneys both inside and outside the state: comply with the rules for being admitted
to practice here or else.
MoreHigh court privately reprimands attorney
August 30, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has privately reprimanded an attorney for improperly revealing information about a former client
when socializing with friends.
MoreJudge sues prosecutor for intimidation, retribution
August 23, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA Delaware County judge is claiming that county prosecutor Mark McKinney and a former deputy prosecutor threatened and intimidated
the judge and his wife based on the judge’s ruling on how McKinney handled civil drug forfeitures.
MoreCourt suspends attorney for 30 days
August 9, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has imposed a 30-day suspension against an Indianapolis attorney who was one of nearly three dozen
people to recently apply for an opening on the state’s highest court.
MoreDisciplinary rulings explore 'knowing' standard
July 21, 2010
Michael HoskinsAttorneys faced misconduct cases involving incorrect citation, agreement-signing.
MoreDisciplinary Actions - 7/21
July 21, 2010
Disciplinary actions from July 21-Aug. 3, 2010, issue.
MoreLawyer privately reprimanded for hiring inmate
July 2, 2010
The Indiana Supreme Court handed down a private reprimand to a Shelby County attorney who engaged in misconduct by hiring
a nonlawyer inmate to help research and prepare a post-conviction relief petition for another client.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!