July 7, 2010
Michael HoskinsEvery summer, an attorney-authored review analyzes and highlights the Indiana Supreme Court’s activity during the past
year. But only rarely does that report come at a time when the state’s highest court is seeing change.
More
June 23, 2010
Michael HoskinsA line of litigation has been playing out in state and federal courts involving what is and isn't allowed under the Automatic
Dialing Machines Statute.
More
May 11, 2010
IL StaffThe Neighborhood Christian Legal Clinic in Indianapolis raised more than $40,000 at its annual “Justice for all”
event.
More
March 31, 2010
Elizabeth BrockettSommer Barnard. Locke Reynolds. Dann Pecar Newman & Kleiman. Those are just a few Indiana law firm names that are now only
part of history.
More
September 3, 2009
IL StaffBarnes & Thornburg has opened an office in Delaware to help clients with finance, insolvency, restructuring, and business
bankruptcy issues, the Indianapolis-based firm announced today.
More
June 22, 2009
IL StaffBarnes & Thornburg announced today an expansion into Minnesota thanks to an acquisition of The Parsinen Law Firm.
More
June 3, 2009
IL StaffSeveral law firms with Indiana ties have been recognized recently.
More
April 6, 2009
Elizabeth BrockettBarnes & Thornburg, one of the largest Indiana-based law firms, has opened an office in Atlanta.
More
January 28, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe foot or more of snow dumped on the southern two-thirds of Indiana hasn't stopped some attorneys from making it to
their offices today, but it has closed some courts around the state.
More
January 9, 2009
Michael HoskinsA newly appointed federal magistrate in Indianapolis denies any misconduct or knowledge of wrongdoing that a judge says happened
during a clean air trial last spring prior to her taking the bench.
More
January 1, 2009
Elizabeth BrockettBarnes & Thornburg has opened its ninth office nationwide in Columbus, Ohio, and its second new office in as many weeks.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!