May 8, 2013
IL StaffAn Indiana junior high school team has brought home the crown from a newly created civic education competition held in Washington,
D.C., May 3 through 7.
More
August 31, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryTwo thirsty cowboys descend from a winding forest trail and hitch their horses to a post. They saunter about 100 paces to
the tavern to grab a beer, where a tattooed bartender is watching the only TV in town, and Patsy Cline’s voice drifts
from the stereo. An elderly couple enjoys a post-lunch stroll in the garden, and in the distance, the high-pitched whine of
a table saw means the handyman is hard at work, as usual. This is life in Story, a tiny patch of paradise that began as a
logging town in 1850.
More
August 3, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals split in affirming a man’s drunk-driving conviction, with the dissenting judge finding
the prosecutor’s questions to the jury and repeated reference to the defendant as a bully at trial made a fair trial
impossible.
More
April 12, 2011
Michael HoskinsJurists on the Indiana Court of Appeals disagreed on an issue of first impression about what an “aggrieved” party
is when it comes to filing a mandate or injunction against a water conservancy district under state statute.
More
November 18, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe same day it heard arguments about the dissolution of a Brown County fire district, the Indiana Supreme Court reinstated
the intermediate court’s ruling on the case because of a 2-2 division caused by the recusal of Chief Justice Randall
T. Shepard.
More
February 26, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Brown County Commissioners had no authority to enact an ordinance to attempt to dissolve a recently created fire district,
the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
September 2, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA board of commissioners in a southern Indiana county had the authority under Indiana statute to pass an ordinance creating
a county-wide fire protection district, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.