Carroll County
Insufficient notice voids tax deed
May 30, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals found a Carroll County man should be allowed to make a redemption payment to obtain five parcels
of real estate owned by his mother that were put in a tax sale. The failure to comply with the statutes governing tax sales
and redemption rendered void a tax deed on the properties assigned to someone else.
MoreFather’s confession shouldn’t have been admitted at trial
August 22, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a father’s conviction of child molesting related to his daughter, finding his
confession, which was admitted into evidence at trial, was obtained in violation of Miranda protocol.
MoreElection for judicial commissions member this fall
August 5, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission and Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications are looking for a new attorney
member.
MoreJustices rule on sentence modification
April 30, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA conviction of a Class D felony that is later reduced to a Class A misdemeanor doesn’t prevent a trial court from
modifying a sentence below the statutory minimum, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today in a matter of first impression.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!