May 11, 2012
Dave StaffordA celebration of former Indiana Chief Justice Randall Shepard on Thursday set the stage for the launch of a fund in his name
that will continue his legacy of promoting diversity.
More
May 9, 2012
The Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum recently gave Randall T. Shepard, former Indiana chief justice, an award for
his contributions to continuing legal education.
More
May 2, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission will meet May 15 to vote on who will be Indiana’s chief justice. Justice
Brent Dickson has been acting chief justice since Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard retired in March.
More
April 20, 2012
Jennifer NelsonDistinguished members of the judicial community, including former Massachusetts Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall, will be
on hand May 10 at a celebration dinner honoring former Indiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard.
More
March 28, 2012
IL StaffIndiana Lawyer sat down with Randall T. Shepard for a Q&A before he retired from the Indiana Supreme Court March
23.
More
March 5, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Child Advocates Network and the State Office of GAL/CASA of the Division of State Court Administration held a
rally at the Indiana Statehouse Monday morning to highlight the need for and the importance of court appointed special advocates.
More
March 2, 2012
IL StaffIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard will be on WFYI Public Radio’s “No Limits” program the week of
March 5 as the show takes a look at his legacy.
More
February 23, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission has selected Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Cale J. Bradford, Indianapolis attorney
Mark S. Massa, and Jane A. Seigel of the Indiana Judicial Center as finalists for an upcoming Indiana Supreme Court vacancy.
More
February 9, 2012
Jennifer NelsonFour men and three women have been named semi-finalists to become the next Indiana Supreme Court justice.
More
January 27, 2012
Jennifer NelsonFifteen people have applied to be the next Indiana Supreme Court justice, the high court announced Friday. They are vying
to replace Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard, who will leave the bench March 4.
More
January 18, 2012
Michael HoskinsShepard says state courts are no longer 'Lone Rangers.'
More
January 12, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard gave his final State of the Judiciary on Wednesday, recapping not only the past 12
months, but also highlighting court initiatives and changes that have occurred during the quarter century he spent as chief
justice.
More
January 10, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard on Wednesday will give his annual State of the Judiciary address to a joint session
of the Indiana General Assembly, the final time he will do so before retiring in March.
More
December 21, 2011
Michael HoskinsRandall T. Shepard will retire from the bench as country’s longest-serving state court leader.
More
December 19, 2011
Michael HoskinsLawyers interested in becoming the next justice on the Indiana Supreme Court have until Jan. 27 to apply for the opening created
by Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard’s upcoming retirement.
More
December 9, 2011
IL StaffOn the heels of the announcement that Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard is retiring from the Indiana Supreme Court, Indiana
University announced this week that the justice will address graduates at the Bloomington campus’ winter commencement
Dec. 17.
More
December 7, 2011
Michael HoskinsIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard – the longest-serving state court chief justice in the nation – is retiring
from the bench in March after nearly 27 years on the appellate bench and a quarter century in that top administrative position.
More
December 7, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard announced Wednesday that he is stepping down from the bench in March 2012.
More
November 9, 2011
Michael HoskinsNew Indiana Justice Steven David is settled but still finding his niche.
More
October 4, 2011
IL StaffAn attorney who made significant contributions in pro bono service will receive a posthumous honor on Oct. 21.
More
July 21, 2011
Jennifer NelsonFour of the five Indiana Supreme Court justices decided that the man found asleep in the waiting room of a dental office –
who had an empty handgun on him – should only be sentenced to 20 years for the crime instead of 40 years.
More
June 30, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIn a 4-1 decision handed down June 30, the Indiana Supreme Court found a man's consent to the swab of his cheek for DNA
was voluntary, so the swab didn't violate the Fourth Amendment.
More
June 30, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court issued three opinions June 29 dealing with what fees are recoverable under the Adult Wrongful Death
Statute, holding that attorney fees, litigation expenses, and loss of services can be recovered. Chief Justice Randall T.
Shepard and Justice Robert Rucker dissented in each decision, believing that those fees aren’t allowed under the statute.
More
June 22, 2011
Michael HoskinsWelcoming a new justice was undeniably the most notable moment for the Indiana Supreme Court in 2010. That lineup change captured
the headlines, but it’s not the only item of interest for Indiana court-watchers.
More
June 16, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard has approved a 1.3 percent pay increase for judges and prosecutors.
More
G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.
SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.
Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.
Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.
Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.
This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.