February 23, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the denial of an incarcerated man's petition for child support modification after
determining the trial court incorrectly imputed his weekly gross income.
More
November 26, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals examined the state's code regarding the limits of a withholding amount in child support arrearage,
and acknowledged that its interpretation of the statute allowing the state to increase the amount without a court order "may
cause some concern."
More
October 29, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals agreed a man was not in contempt for failing to pay child support ordered by a Florida court
even though the Indiana trial court enforced his obligation for less than the amount ordered in Florida.
More
September 22, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted three transfers late last week, including one in which the court will re-examine a 2007
decision involving child support and incarcerated parents.
More
August 21, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA retroactive child support action brought by an adult child presented an issue of first impression for the Indiana Court
of Appeals, which ruled the adult child could bring the action, but his mother would be the proper recipient of the retroactive
payments.
More
July 18, 2008
Michael HoskinsCreative suggestions came from a public hearing today about how to modify Indiana's child support rules and guidelines.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.