Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure
Public input wanted on proposed changes to court rules
April 5, 2013
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court wants to hear from judges, attorneys and the general public as it considers possible changes to
court rules.
MoreSupreme Court amends Indiana rules
September 18, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana justices have issued several orders amending the rules of court. Among them is a change that allows the Disciplinary
Commission to seek reimbursement from attorneys who have resigned or been disbarred.
MoreChief justice appoints 2 to rules committee
July 23, 2012
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Chief Justice Brent E. Dickson has appointed Lake Superior Judge Calvin D. Hawkins and Muncie attorney Perry Gregory
Cross to the Indiana Supreme Court Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure.
MoreComment time extended on state court rules
April 13, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Hoosier legal community has more time to offer comment on a multitude of state court rules that are being examined for
potential revision.
MoreRules being reviewed on temporary out-of-state attorney admission
March 17, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court is reviewing the rules on how out-of-state attorneys receive temporary admission to practice law
before state administrative executive agencies.
MoreRewriting the rules on attorney advertising
October 27, 2010
Michael HoskinsIf you practice law in Indiana, new rules are at your doorstep for how to go about attorney advertising in this state.
MoreUpdated rules to govern lawyer advertising
October 15, 2010
Michael HoskinsCulminating a process that began five years ago, the Indiana Supreme Court has approved the first attorney advertising rule
change of its kind in about a generation.
MoreInput sought on proposed changes
May 26, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure is seeking comment through June 20 on several proposed
rule changes.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 22, 2013 Floyd Weddle v. State of Indiana - 5/22/13
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.