December 5, 2012
From DTCIThe DTCI’s flagship publication, the Indiana Civil Litigation Review, will be distributed soon. Members and
subscribers can anticipate another issue full of valuable information and analyses by leaders of Indiana’s defense bar.
More
November 21, 2012
From DTCIBoth authors of this article recently had experiences in which our clients have shown us the true emotional impact that litigation
can have on a new litigant.
More
November 7, 2012
Jeffrey MortierIndiana Supreme Court provides guidance.
More
November 7, 2012
From DTCIDuring its Annual Meeting Nov. 15-16, the DTCI will recognize the outstanding defense lawyers of 2012.
More
October 24, 2012
Michele BryantI cannot imagine any professionals more obsessed with time than lawyers. While a great debate still rages as to whether the
billable hour is dead, the fact remains that many lawyers continue to measure services to clients by a unit of time: the billable
hour.
More
October 10, 2012
How do insurers effectively rescind insurance policies?
More
October 10, 2012
From DTCIJohn C. Trimble, partner at Lewis Wagner and former president of the DTCI, has been named 2013 Indianapolis Insurance Law
Lawyer of the Year by Best Lawyers.
More
September 26, 2012
If you are a woman trying to make it to the top of a law firm, can you expect a higher-ranking female attorney to take you
under her wing? Do you need to undermine other women in order to advance or treat other women as threats?
More
September 12, 2012
From DTCIJoin your colleagues at the Abe Martin Lodge inside Brown County State Park for a casual but informative two-day seminar.
Bring your family and enjoy the park activities, including the indoor water park. 13.5 hours CLE credit (2.0 hours ethics)
pending
More
September 12, 2012
There are few torts that have been subject to more expansion and modification in the last 20 years than negligent infliction
of emotional distress.
More
August 29, 2012
From DTCIJames Strenski writes about why lawyers need to get away from their cell phones occasionally.
More
August 15, 2012
Jason MassaroJason Massaro writes about Indiana's Corporations Law and Judicial Order of Inspection.
More
August 15, 2012
From DTCIThe Defense Trial Counsel’s annual meeting will be held Nov. 15-16. One of the highlights of the meeting is the presentation
of the “Defense Lawyer of the Year,” the “Diplomat of the Indiana Defense Trial Counsel,” and the
“Outstanding Young Lawyer” awards.
More
August 15, 2012
From DTCIThe Trial Academy is the only trial technique seminar in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin specifically designed for the defense
lawyer. Each student is videotaped while conducting part of the trial, and each receives a copy of that videotape upon conclusion
of the Trial Academy.
More
August 1, 2012
Thomas SchultzThe 2012 DRI Annual Meeting will return to the Crescent City – New Orleans, La., – Oct. 24-28. For those of you
who have had the pleasure of attending prior annual meetings in New Orleans, you will understand what a great time is in store
for all attendees.
More
July 18, 2012
From DTCIAnn Stewart and Karen Dutcher write about workers' compensation rulings from the last six months.
More
July 4, 2012
From DTCIWhile I am sure this writing could be deemed just another one that promotes civility, and while I am sure that there is a
long list of ethical rules that promote that, too, I cite none here. I simply say this: Stop the (to use a football phrase)
“unnecessary roughness.” I am hereby throwing a “flag on the play.”
More
June 20, 2012
From DTCIAccolades for DTCI members.
More
June 20, 2012
Elliott Pinkie and Bill Kanasky write about persuasion through the use of primary and recency effects.
More
June 6, 2012
Lawyers representing plaintiffs and defendants in civil tort actions will eventually be challenged with protecting their client’s
alcohol and drug treatment records from disclosure.
More
June 6, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Trial Lawyers Association joined with the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana to promote courtesy among adversaries.
The two held a seminar on civility at Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law.
More
May 23, 2012
In its recent opinion in the case of Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. Garrett, No. 49S02-1106-CT-365 (Ind. 2012),
the Indiana Supreme Court provided some needed clarity concerning liability of construction managers for injuries suffered
by employees of contractors on a construction site.
More
May 9, 2012
Robert Thornburg writes about civility among the legal profession.
More
April 25, 2012
A procedural or substantive concern in a strict liability action?
More
April 25, 2012
From DTCIKori McOmber writes about the various apps one can use on the iPad to help with practicing law.
More
Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution