Disciplinary Actions

Disciplinary Actions - 10/8/14

October 8, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been recently disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/24/14

September 24, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's received a public reprimand and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/10/14

September 10, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended or resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 8/27/14

August 27, 2014
IL Staff
Read who recently was reinstated to practice.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 8/13/14

August 13, 2014
IL Staff
Read who recently resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/30/14

July 30, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently resigned or been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/2/14

July 2, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been recently suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/18/14

June 18, 2014
IL Staff
Read who has been disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/4/14

June 4, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disbarred or suspended recently.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/21/14

May 21, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disbarred, suspended or resigned from the bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/7/14

May 7, 2014
IBJ Staff
Read who's been barred from practice in Indiana and who has been reprimanded.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/23/14

April 23, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/9/14

April 9, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disciplined and who received a favorable judgment from the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/26/14

March 26, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been held in contempt of court and who has resigned recently.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/12/14

March 12, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/26/14

February 26, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's received a public reprimand and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/12/14

February 12, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/29/14

January 29, 2014
Read who's resigned and who's been reinstated to the practice of law.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/15/14

January 15, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and reinstated to the practice of law.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/1/14

January 1, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended due to disability.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 12/18/13

December 18, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended or reinstated to practice in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions -11/20/13

November 20, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been disciplined recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/6/13

November 6, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended or resigned recently in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/23/13

October 23, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended or publicly reprimanded recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - Oct. 9, 2013

October 9, 2013
IBJ Staff
Read about disciplinary actions issued by the Supreme Court.
More
Page  1 2 3 4 5 >> pager
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Poor Judge Brown probably thought that by slavishly serving the godz of the age her violations of 18th century concepts like due process and the rule of law would be overlooked. Mayhaps she was merely a Judge ahead of her time?

  2. in a lawyer discipline case Judge Brown, now removed, was presiding over a hearing about a lawyer accused of the supposedly heinous ethical violation of saying the words "Illegal immigrant." (IN re Barker) http://www.in.gov/judiciary/files/order-discipline-2013-55S00-1008-DI-429.pdf .... I wonder if when we compare the egregious violations of due process by Judge Brown, to her chiding of another lawyer for politically incorrectness, if there are any conclusions to be drawn about what kind of person, what kind of judge, what kind of apparatchik, is busy implementing the agenda of political correctness and making off-limits legit advocacy about an adverse party in a suit whose illegal alien status is relevant? I am just asking the question, the reader can make own conclsuion. Oh wait-- did I use the wrong adjective-- let me rephrase that, um undocumented alien?

  3. of course the bigger questions of whether or not the people want to pay for ANY bussing is off limits, due to the Supreme Court protecting the people from DEMOCRACY. Several decades hence from desegregation and bussing plans and we STILL need to be taking all this taxpayer money to combat mostly-imagined "discrimination" in the most obviously failed social program of the postwar period.

  4. You can put your photos anywhere you like... When someone steals it they know it doesn't belong to them. And, a man getting a divorce is automatically not a nice guy...? That's ridiculous. Since when is need of money a conflict of interest? That would mean that no one should have a job unless they are already financially solvent without a job... A photographer is also under no obligation to use a watermark (again, people know when a photo doesn't belong to them) or provide contact information. Hey, he didn't make it easy for me to pay him so I'll just take it! Well heck, might as well walk out of the grocery store with a cart full of food because the lines are too long and you don't find that convenient. "Only in Indiana." Oh, now you're passing judgement on an entire state... What state do you live in? I need to characterize everyone in your state as ignorant and opinionated. And the final bit of ignorance; assuming a photo anyone would want is lucky and then how much does your camera have to cost to make it a good photo, in your obviously relevant opinion?

  5. Seventh Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood has stated in “The Rule of Law in Times of Stress” (2003), “that neither laws nor the procedures used to create or implement them should be secret; and . . . the laws must not be arbitrary.” According to the American Bar Association, Wood’s quote drives home this point: The rule of law also requires that people can expect predictable results from the legal system; this is what Judge Wood implies when she says that “the laws must not be arbitrary.” Predictable results mean that people who act in the same way can expect the law to treat them in the same way. If similar actions do not produce similar legal outcomes, people cannot use the law to guide their actions, and a “rule of law” does not exist.

ADVERTISEMENT