Disciplinary Actions

Disciplinary Actions - 6/18/14

June 18, 2014
IL Staff
Read who has been disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/4/14

June 4, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disbarred or suspended recently.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/21/14

May 21, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disbarred, suspended or resigned from the bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/7/14

May 7, 2014
IBJ Staff
Read who's been barred from practice in Indiana and who has been reprimanded.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/23/14

April 23, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/9/14

April 9, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been disciplined and who received a favorable judgment from the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/26/14

March 26, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been held in contempt of court and who has resigned recently.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/12/14

March 12, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/26/14

February 26, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's received a public reprimand and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/12/14

February 12, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/29/14

January 29, 2014
Read who's resigned and who's been reinstated to the practice of law.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/15/14

January 15, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and reinstated to the practice of law.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/1/14

January 1, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended due to disability.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 12/18/13

December 18, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended or reinstated to practice in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions -11/20/13

November 20, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been disciplined recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/6/13

November 6, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended or resigned recently in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/23/13

October 23, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended or publicly reprimanded recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - Oct. 9, 2013

October 9, 2013
IBJ Staff
Read about disciplinary actions issued by the Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary actions - Sept. 25, 2013

September 25, 2013
Read disciplinary actions issued by the Indiana Supreme Court in recent weeks.
More

Disciplinary Actions 8/28/13

August 28, 2013
IBJ Staff
Read who has recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Action - 8/14/2013

August 14, 2013
IL Staff
Read who has recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/31/13

July 31, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/17/13

July 17, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court, received a public reprimand or resigned.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/3/13

July 3, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended or resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/19/13

June 19, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Whether you support "gay marriage" or not is not the issue. The issue is whether the SCOTUS can extract from an unmentionable somewhere the notion that the Constitution forbids government "interference" in the "right" to marry. Just imagine time-traveling to Philadelphia in 1787. Ask James Madison if the document he and his fellows just wrote allowed him- or forbade government to "interfere" with- his "right" to marry George Washington? He would have immediately- and justly- summoned the Sergeant-at-Arms to throw your sorry self out into the street. Far from being a day of liberation, this is a day of capitulation by the Rule of Law to the Rule of What's Happening Now.

  2. With today's ruling, AG Zoeller's arguments in the cases of Obamacare and Same-sex Marriage can be relegated to the ash heap of history. 0-fer

  3. She must be a great lawyer

  4. Ind. Courts - "Illinois ranks 49th for how court system serves disadvantaged" What about Indiana? A story today from Dave Collins of the AP, here published in the Benton Illinois Evening News, begins: Illinois' court system had the third-worst score in the nation among state judiciaries in serving poor, disabled and other disadvantaged members of the public, according to new rankings. Illinois' "Justice Index" score of 34.5 out of 100, determined by the nonprofit National Center for Access to Justice, is based on how states serve people with disabilities and limited English proficiency, how much free legal help is available and how states help increasing numbers of people representing themselves in court, among other issues. Connecticut led all states with a score of 73.4 and was followed by Hawaii, Minnesota, New York and Delaware, respectively. Local courts in Washington, D.C., had the highest overall score at 80.9. At the bottom was Oklahoma at 23.7, followed by Kentucky, Illinois, South Dakota and Indiana. ILB: That puts Indiana at 46th worse. More from the story: Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, Colorado, Tennessee and Maine had perfect 100 scores in serving people with disabilities, while Indiana, Georgia, Wyoming, Missouri and Idaho had the lowest scores. Those rankings were based on issues such as whether interpretation services are offered free to the deaf and hearing-impaired and whether there are laws or rules allowing service animals in courthouses. The index also reviewed how many civil legal aid lawyers were available to provide free legal help. Washington, D.C., had nearly nine civil legal aid lawyers per 10,000 people in poverty, the highest rate in the country. Texas had the lowest rate, 0.43 legal aid lawyers per 10,000 people in poverty. http://indianalawblog.com/archives/2014/11/ind_courts_illi_1.html

  5. A very thorough opinion by the federal court. The Rooker-Feldman analysis, in particular, helps clear up muddy water as to the entanglement issue. Looks like the Seventh Circuit is willing to let its district courts cruise much closer to the Indiana Supreme Court's shorelines than most thought likely, at least when the ADA on the docket. Some could argue that this case and Praekel, taken together, paint a rather unflattering picture of how the lower courts are being advised as to their duties under the ADA. A read of the DOJ amicus in Praekel seems to demonstrate a less-than-congenial view toward the higher echelons in the bureaucracy.

ADVERTISEMENT