Disciplinary Actions

Disciplinary Actions - 6/19/13

June 19, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's recently been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/5/13

June 5, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 5/22/13

May 22, 2013
Read who's been suspended and who has resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary actions - 5/8/13

May 8, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended recently by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions -4/24/13

April 24, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and who's been publicly reprimanded by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 4/10/13

April 10, 2013
IL Staff
Read who has recently resigned from the bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 3/27/13

March 27, 2013
IL Staff
See who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/27/13

February 27, 2013
IBJ Staff, IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and received a public reprimand.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 2/13/13

February 13, 2013
IL Staff
Read who's resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions -1/30/13

January 30, 2013
IL Staff
Read about the latest suspensions handed down by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 1/16/13

January 16, 2013
IL Staff
See who's discipline has been rescinded.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 12/21/12

December 19, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/23/12

November 21, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been suspended and who has had his proceeding stayed.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 11/9/12

November 7, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been disciplined by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/26/12

October 24, 2012
IL Staff
See what attorney has been held in contempt by the Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 10/12/12

October 10, 2012
Read who's had his license revoked and who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/28/12

September 26, 2012
IL Staff
Read who has been suspended, reprimanded, held in contempt or reinstated by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 9/14/12

September 12, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been reinstated by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - Aug. 31, 2012

August 29, 2012
IL Staff
Read who has resigned and who was suspended.
More

Disciplinary actions - Aug. 17, 2012

August 15, 2012
IL Staff
Read who has been suspended by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 8/3/12

August 1, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been suspended and who's resigned from the Indiana bar.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/20/12

July 18, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's resigned and who's been suspended in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 7/6/12

July 4, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's been disbarred and suspended in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/22/12

June 20, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been suspended and reinstated in Indiana.
More

Disciplinary Actions - 6/8/12

June 6, 2012
Learn who's been suspended, reinstated, or had charges dismissed.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The practitioners and judges who hail E-filing as the Saviour of the West need to contain their respective excitements. E-filing is federal court requires the practitioner to cram his motion practice into pigeonholes created by IT people. Compound motions or those seeking alternative relief are effectively barred, unless the practitioner wants to receive a tart note from some functionary admonishing about the "problem". E-filing is just another method by which courts and judges transfer their burden to practitioners, who are the really the only powerless components of the system. Of COURSE it is easier for the court to require all of its imput to conform to certain formats, but this imposition does NOT improve the quality of the practice of law and does NOT improve the ability of the practitioner to advocate for his client or to fashion pleadings that exactly conform to his client's best interests. And we should be very wary of the disingenuous pablum about the costs. The courts will find a way to stick it to the practitioner. Lake County is a VERY good example of this rapaciousness. Any one who does not believe this is invited to review the various special fees that system imposes upon practitioners- as practitioners- and upon each case ON TOP of the court costs normal in every case manually filed. Jurisprudence according to Aldous Huxley.

  2. Any attorneys who practice in federal court should be able to say the same as I can ... efiling is great. I have been doing it in fed court since it started way back. Pacer has its drawbacks, but the ability to hit an e-docket and pull up anything and everything onscreen is a huge plus for a litigator, eps the sole practitioner, who lacks a filing clerk and the paralegal support of large firms. Were I an Indiana attorney I would welcome this great step forward.

  3. Can we get full disclosure on lobbyist's payments to legislatures such as Mr Buck? AS long as there are idiots that are disrespectful of neighbors and intent on shooting fireworks every night, some kind of regulations are needed.

  4. I am the mother of the child in this case. My silence on the matter was due to the fact that I filed, both in Illinois and Indiana, child support cases. I even filed supporting documentation with the Indiana family law court. Not sure whether this information was provided to the court of appeals or not. Wish the case was done before moving to Indiana, because no matter what, there is NO WAY the state of Illinois would have allowed an appeal on a child support case!

  5. "No one is safe when the Legislature is in session."

ADVERTISEMENT