Editorial

Editorial: Don't keep quiet, join a healthy debate

June 9, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
We know you have opinions – thoughtful, reasonable ones that would make for great discourse in the newspaper. But getting you to share them is more difficult than we would like.
More

Editorial: Hunt for victims' rights

May 26, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer

Here at the newspaper, we’re big fans of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. But we understand the need for and exuberance some individuals feel for the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

More

Editorial: Political pomposity a disservice to public

April 28, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
Dawn Johnsen deserved the nomination, and definitely was the right woman for the job, but unfortunately partisan vitriol appears to be worth more in Washington, D.C., than doing the right thing.
More

Editorial: We the People team's civics study heartens many

April 14, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
Like it or not, we live in a time where, for some people at least, it's become acceptable to speak about "reloading" when doing battle against political opponents and to mark their political districts with gun sites, and where members of a Midwestern church believe it's their duty to travel the nation and spew hate-laced messages in places where people are mourning tragedy.
More

Editorial: Lawmakers don't inspire confidence

March 17, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan certainly spoke for us when he asked this question a couple of weeks ago: "Wouldn't we feel better about all of this if it hadn't been enacted on partyline votes, though?"
More

Editorial: Losing sight of the goal

March 3, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
Feb. 25 was certainly an ugly day.
More

Editorial: Deadbeat bill a good idea

February 17, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
At first glance, the legislation seems like the sort that no one could possibly have an objection to.
More

Editorial: SCOTUS order in Proposition 8 trial chillsRestricted Content

January 20, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
It sounded too good be true, so we weren't surprised when we found out it was not to be.
More

Editorial: Quit stalling nominations

January 6, 2010
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
After languishing in the U.S. Senate for about 10 months, the nomination of Dawn Johnsen to lead the Office of Legal Counsel finally got some action.
More

Editorial: State should avoid selection slugfests

July 23, 2008
Editorial Indiana Lawyer
We'd like to see the average voter know more about our appellate courts.
More
Page  << 1 2 pager
Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Indiana State Bar Association

Indianapolis Bar Association

Evansville Bar Association

Allen County Bar Association

Indiana Lawyer on Facebook

facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. KUDOS to the Indiana Supreme Court for realizing that some bureacracies need to go to the stake. Recall what RWR said: "No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth!" NOW ... what next to this rare and inspiring chopping block? Well, the Commission on Gender and Race (but not religion!?!) is way overdue. And some other Board's could be cut with a positive for State and the reputation of the Indiana judiciary.

  2. During a visit where an informant with police wears audio and video, does the video necessary have to show hand to hand transaction of money and narcotics?

  3. I will agree with that as soon as law schools stop lying to prospective students about salaries and employment opportunities in the legal profession. There is no defense to the fraudulent numbers first year salaries they post to mislead people into going to law school.

  4. The sad thing is that no fish were thrown overboard The "greenhorn" who had never fished before those 5 days was interrogated for over 4 hours by 5 officers until his statement was illicited, "I don't want to go to prison....." The truth is that these fish were measured frozen off shore and thawed on shore. The FWC (state) officer did not know fish shrink, so the only reason that these fish could be bigger was a swap. There is no difference between a 19 1/2 fish or 19 3/4 fish, short fish is short fish, the ticket was written. In addition the FWC officer testified at trial, he does not measure fish in accordance with federal law. There was a document prepared by the FWC expert that said yes, fish shrink and if these had been measured correctly they averaged over 20 inches (offshore frozen). This was a smoke and mirror prosecution.

  5. I love this, Dave! Many congrats to you! We've come a long way from studying for the bar together! :)

ADVERTISEMENT