October 24, 2012
Dave StaffordAnnual gathering presentations also explore alternative fees and interacting with the media.
More
October 16, 2012
IL StaffThe Tabor Institute on Legal Ethics topic this year at Valparaiso University Law School is United States Supreme Court ethics
in the wake of NFIB v. Seblius.
More
May 9, 2012
Jennifer NelsonAn attorney's inquiry on a listserv led to the Indiana State Bar Association ethics opinion.
More
February 29, 2012
Michael HoskinsEthical issues faced by attorneys practicing energy law are often the result of the small number of lawyers currently in that
field of law.
More
October 5, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe governor today fired the state's top utility regulator, citing ethical concerns about how a former Administrative
Law Judge presided over cases involving a regulated energy company leading up to his taking a job there.
More
September 27, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerAmong the focuses for this year’s Indiana State Bar Association's fourth Legal Education Conclave conclave, which
takes place every few years, were diversity, ethics, and stress among lawyers and law students.
More
August 18, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerAs social media is becoming more accepted as a way for professionals to network and promote business, some attorneys are slowly
getting their feet wet, while others have decided to dive in head first.
More
April 14, 2010
Michael HoskinsAs controversy swirls around the Marion County Prosecutor's Office, attorneys throughout Indiana have their eyes on how the
ethical issues can be a lesson for the state's legal community.
More
March 19, 2009
IL StaffEthical dilemmas faced by corporate attorneys are the topics of this year's Tabor Institute on Legal Ethics at Valparaiso
University School of Law.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.