May 9, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryEconomics are one reason why lawyers postpone withdrawal from practice.
More
April 25, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryA construction management company was found not liable by the Indiana Supreme Court for a subcontractor's injury.
More
March 28, 2012
Michael HoskinsPatent attorneys face unique concerns in creating firms.
More
March 28, 2012
Michael HoskinsA New York federal suit challenges publishers' selling of attorneys' work.
More
March 14, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryOpinions vary about whether employers should be able to check personal credit histories.
More
March 14, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryAttorneys say more clients are asking about rights and laws.
More
February 29, 2012
Case involving a pork producer was first test of law enacted in 2009.
More
February 29, 2012
Michael HoskinsEthical issues faced by attorneys practicing energy law are often the result of the small number of lawyers currently in that
field of law.
More
February 15, 2012
Jenny Montgomery9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision raises concerns about bone marrow donation.
More
February 15, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryAttorney Lorie Brown was a nurse for 12 years before becoming a lawyer. Now, she hopes to help nurses avoid some of the common
mistakes that could land them in litigation.
More
February 1, 2012
Michael HoskinsFewer jury trials leave young lawyers looking for experience outside of court.
More
February 1, 2012
Michael HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals finds single expert can establish standard of care for legal malpractice.
More
January 18, 2012
Jenny MontgomerySenate Bill 18 could reduce arrearages.
More
January 18, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryAttorneys say collaborative divorce works for clients who hope to avoid the courtroom.
More
January 4, 2012
Michael HoskinsAttorneys help plan for the big event in February 2012 in Indianapolis.
More
January 4, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryNew laws and policies are prompted by the long-term effects of head injuries in sports.
More
December 21, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryFishing, boating and swimming are popular summer pastimes in Indiana, but increasingly, Hoosiers looking for a relaxing weekend
at the lake are being warned to avoid the water altogether due to pollution.
More
December 7, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana plans to address attacks on courts and judges.
More
December 7, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryCivility and clarifying priorities are among Lonnie D. Johnson's key initiatives for 2012.
More
December 7, 2011
James JohnsonCases include wrongful death attorney fees and spoliation.
More
November 23, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryStates differ on interpretation of federal law, create state statutes addressing in-state status for college students.
More
November 9, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryA talent show at the annual state bar meeting allowed lawyers to show off their abilities and even laugh at themselves.
More
November 9, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryIn a 45-minute conversation with C. Erik Chickedantz, the accomplished lawyer and Vietnam veteran never boasted about his
own accomplishments, although the many awards in his office are a testament to his service to Indiana’s legal profession.
More
November 9, 2011
See photos of award winners from the Indiana State Bar Association's annual meeting in French Lick, Ind.
More
November 9, 2011
IL StaffCongratulations to Indiana's newest attorneys, admitted Oct. 14, 2011.
More
G. Michael Witte letter states he's suspended for three years. The case that got him suspended is identical to my estate case, including havin the Late Judge Deiter recuse himself because Newman had a conflict of interest with the judge. His Modus Operandi is nearly identical.
SIGNED BY G. MICHAEL WITTE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION DATED MAY 17, 2012.
Your 6th complaint against Lawrence T. Newman filed on 4/12/2012. On 1/31/12, the Indiana Supreme Court entered an order suspending Lawrence T. Newman’s law license for a period of three years. More important, even after three years, Lawrence Todd Newman will not get his license back unless and until he goes through a separate proceeding to prove that he is fit to practice law. This is not an easy process, and the burden is upon Lawrence T. Newman to prove by clear and convincing evidence that he is fit to return to practice.
Because of the length of Lawrence T. Newman’s license suspension and the fact he may never succeed in getting his law license reinstated, we are not opening an investigation file at this time.
Should Lawrence T. Newman seek reinstatement in the future, we will open your file and ask Lawrence T. Newman to address your grievance as part of his burden of proving fitness. We have attempted to notify Lawrence T. Newman that this will be required of him.
It may disappoint you to hear that we will be doing nothing on your grievance at this time. However, the most our office can ever accomplish is to take away a lawyer’s license to practice law. We have already done that, albeit as a result of misconduct in cases other than your own. It makes better sense for our office to focus its limited resources on cases where the lawyers are still actively practicing law.
Is there any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division? I am the unfortunate victim of a retaliatory lawsuit brought by Lawrence Todd Newman, the attorney from an estate case on which I worked as a unsupervised personal representative in 2006. The contract agreement for that case stated that the estate would be responsible for all attorney fees, but Newman refused to close the nearly insolvent estate when my duties were complete and his fees were paid. Instead, he tried to extort additional attorney fees from me by keeping the case open to address a wrongful death claim, despite the estate’s heir’s lack of interest in pursuing it and an expert doctor’s opinion that it would not be worth doing so. He also knowingly deceived me into believing that a “closing statement” was needed to close the estate, even though this requirement had actually been waived by the estate’s heir. The heir’s attorney filed a motion to have Newman removed from the case. After the court closed the probate case with prejudice (barred from further litigation) Newman illegally re-opened the case in another courtroom.
As a result of complaints filed against him for these and similar actions, Newman has been suspended from practicing law for 18 months by the Indiana Disciplinary Commission. In retaliation, he has filed suit against me demanding additional attorney fees for the 2006 estate case, despite the fact that I made no agreement stating that I would pay any fees from my own assets on behalf of the estate. This lawsuit violates the rules of ethics, due process of law, and equal protection of law. Newman has been allowed to file ridiculous pleadings at an alarming rate and has been supported by a biased court system. Judge Carroll refuses to recuse himself from the case despite the fact that, by his own admission, he intends to grant Newman sanctions regardless of the evidence. When my former counsel discovered that the previous judge on the case, Judge Sosin, was a long-time close friend of Newman’s family, Judge Carroll commented for the record during a hearing that Judge Sosin in so many words “he finds the door “was weak for recusing himself from the case as a result of this obvious conflict of interest.
This case is a public policy issue. Statutes put in place to protect unsupervised personal representatives in probate matters are being ignored. This case will affect thousands of individuals involved in probating and the personal representation of estates. Justice cannot possibly be served as long as a biased judge is allowed to defend a “vexatious litigant,” as Newman has been described by Judge Logan in Bradenton, Florida court. If there is any justice in the Marion County Superior Court Civil Division, this case against me will be dismissed with prejudice.
Every affront to decency and every style adopted by criminals is not per se a constituttional violation. Only fools believe or espouse that.
This was an unnecessary change in law, a needless fiddling with a tax that impacted very very few hoosiers, but one that erodes a tax base benefitting very many hoosiers. Just because some people wanted to chalk up a "tax cut" on their legislative brag-list, and didnt give a fig about replacing the revenue any other way. Really stupid. I am a republican my whole life and this just shames me like hell. I have to use a fake name over this because I know my fellow republicans are all brain washed over tax cutting too.