May 9, 2013
Jennifer NelsonThe attorney who made statements regarding Franklin Circuit Judge Steven Cox’s release of a prisoner during the time
she was challenging him for his spot on the bench last fall cannot seek judicial office for five years, the Indiana Supreme
Court ruled Thursday. The justices also publicly reprimanded Tammy R. Davis of Brookville.
More
November 7, 2012
IL StaffTammy R. Davis, the Democratic challenger to incumbent Republican Judge Steven J. Cox of Franklin Circuit Court, appears to
have lost her bid to take over Cox’s spot on the bench. According to unofficial numbers from the Indiana Secretary of
State’s office Wednesday morning, Davis received around 4,500 votes; Cox received nearly 6,000 votes.
More
October 26, 2012
Dave StaffordThe woman challenging Franklin Circuit Judge Steven Cox for his job faces seven disciplinary charges over statements attributed
to her about the judge’s release of a prisoner who a year later killed five people, according to a statement Friday
from the Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission. The commission has asked for a public hearing on the charges.
More
March 11, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe 7th Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether several Indiana school corporations discriminate against girls’
basketball teams by scheduling more of their games on weeknights as compared to the boys’ basketball games.
More
December 29, 2010
Michael HoskinsFarm tractor drivers can’t be charged with driving with a suspended license, but they can be charged with operating
a vehicle while intoxicated, according to the Indiana Court of Appeals.
More
July 21, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA Franklin County mother is suing the Indiana High School Athletic Association and multiple school districts claiming discrimination
against the girl’s basketball team based on when the girls play their games.
More
December 15, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a woman in two separate cases involving the purchase of her property at tax
sales in Franklin County after determining she received insufficient notice of the sales.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!