Gibson County
Right to Farm Act bars CAFO nuisance claim, appeals court rules
April 30, 2013
Dave StaffordA Gibson County farmer may not bring a nuisance claim against a neighboring dairy that dramatically expanded its operations
to what he called a “factory-like ‘mega-farm,’” the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled.
MoreSchool bus drivers can’t sue school corporation for collusion
July 25, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe lawsuit for collusion brought by 13 North Gibson School Corporation bus drivers against the school corporation as a result
of bids for a transportation services contract failed on interlocutory appeal before the Indiana Court of Appeals.
MoreAttorney must register as a sex offender
October 7, 2011
Jennifer NelsonAn attorney and former Democratic candidate for Gibson County prosecutor indicted on charges including possession of child
pornography and false informing, entered into a plea agreement Tuesday that wouldn’t have required he register as a
sex offender. After further review, the trial judge realized Indiana law requires him to do so.
MoreCOA affirms perjury, misconduct convictions against children's caseworker
May 6, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Court of Appeals has ruled that that a closed hearing on a juvenile proceeding was admissible as evidence in the
perjury trial of an Indiana Department of Child Services caseworker.
MoreProsecutor candidate drops out of race
July 16, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Democratic candidate for Gibson County Prosecutor has withdrawn from the race following his indictment on four charges,
including possession of child pornography.
MoreProsecutor candidate indicted for child porn, false informing
June 16, 2010
Jennifer NelsonAttorney and Democratic candidate for Gibson County Prosecutor William R. Wallace III was indicted Tuesday on charges of obstruction
of justice, possession of child pornography, patronizing a prostitute, and false informing.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!