Guardianship
Bills on magistrates; custody and visitation pass House
February 21, 2013
IL StaffThe Indiana House of Representatives passed House Bill 1041 Thursday morning 96-0. The bill addresses petitions to modify
custody and visitation involving children who have been abused or neglected.
MoreComment sought on proposed changes to parenting time guidelines
February 8, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Center’s Domestic Relations Committee is seeking comment on proposed changes to the parenting time
guidelines, which includes parenting coordination guidelines.
MoreDCS announces new foster care reimbursement rates
August 19, 2011
Following a lawsuit filed by foster parents after the Indiana Department of Child Services announced in 2009 that it was going
to decrease the foster care per diem by 10 percent, the department announced Friday that it has come up with new reimbursement
rates beginning Jan. 1, 2012.
MoreMan entitled to damages following excavation of home without notice
July 29, 2011
Jennifer NelsonIn reviewing a case in which an attorney appointed guardian of an adult male unilaterally decided to tear down his home without
providing notice to the man, the Indiana Court of Appeals found the attorney violated the man’s due process rights and
damages were necessary.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.