February 24, 2010
IL StaffThe Office of the Public Defender of Indiana is now an American Bar Association Law Office Climate Challenge Partner.
More
February 19, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals found the state proved a defendant had driven drunk, but the judges disagreed as to whether the
state showed the man had endangered others with his driving.
More
February 18, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the finding that the Indiana Department of Environmental Management breached a settlement
agreement because the trial court didn't have subject matter jurisdiction to determine whether it committed a breach.
More
February 18, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed an invasion of privacy conviction today because the state didn't prove the defendant
knew he was the subject of an active protective order. The appellate court also concluded that notice of a protective order
should come from the state.
More
February 17, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the denial of an agreed petition to establish paternity and maternity of a child who
was born of a surrogate, finding equitable relief should allow the biological mother to establish she is in fact the baby's
biological mother.
More
February 17, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed part of a dissolution decree after finding the Marion Superior Court lacked personal
jurisdiction over the husband who was in the military overseas.
More
February 12, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA majority on the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for a golf course, golf scramble organizers, and golfer
in a teenager's suit after she was hit with a golf ball. Today's decision also expanded language from a previous ruling
involving the duty to prevent injury to sports participants to now include sporting event volunteers.
More
February 11, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a defendant's conviction of driving while intoxicated because the state failed to
prove the man was intoxicated when he drove his moped.
More
February 9, 2010
Jennifer NelsonAn appellate judge dissented from the majority's decision to uphold a woman's conviction of operating a car after
her driving privileges had been forfeited for life, finding that confirming her conviction would break from precedent.
More
February 9, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed a defendant's conviction of theft because the trial court failed to instruct the
jury on conversion as a lesser-included offense of theft.
More
February 8, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges disagreed as to whether a company's attempt to exercise its option to repurchase
stock had occurred in a timely manner under a shareholders' agreement.
More
February 3, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals addressed service of summons issues in foreclosure actions in two decisions today, finding the
servicing parties needed to do more to ensure the recipients actually get notice.
More
February 2, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals upheld the finding that a 17-year-old is a child in need of services, ruling that evidence of
her drug test wasn't irrelevant and was properly admitted by the trial court.
More
February 1, 2010
Jennifer NelsonJudges on the Indiana Court of Appeals were split on whether a boss's oral promise to a future employee regarding a severance
package would be barred from consideration by the parol evidence rule.
More
January 29, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA panel of Indiana Court of Appeals judges agreed that two insurance companies are entitled to summary judgment, but the judges
disagreed as to why the insurers owed no duty to defend.
More
January 29, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals travels to an Indianapolis high school Tuesday for arguments in case involving a robbery of a
pharmacy.
More
January 28, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA defendant's belief that his right to seek exculpatory evidence trumps the attorney-client privilege is incorrect, the
Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today.
More
January 27, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed four convictions of attempted robbery after finding the evidence didn't support
a reasonable inference that the defendant intended to rob each of the alleged victims.
More
January 27, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals was compelled today by Indiana Supreme Court precedent to affirm a murder conviction for a man
who was found guilty but mentally ill.
More
January 26, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIn a matter of first impression, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded that a hospital's statutory immunity for reporting
suspected child abuse to authorities extends to its underlying diagnosis.
More
January 20, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIn a matter of first impression, the Indiana Court of Appeals was divided about whether a man's sentence enhancement based
on his use of a deadly weapon violated the application of double-jeopardy principals.
More
January 20, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reaffirmed today that Indiana requires that an annexation ordinance applies only to solid, unbroken
areas of land. This issue arose in an annexation dispute between two northern Indiana towns.
More
January 20, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals visits Carmel High School Thursday to hear arguments in a case stemming from a propane gas explosion.
More
January 19, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals split today in its decision of who should receive back child support payments from a father who
kidnapped his son for 16 years before turning himself in when the son was 23 years old.
More
January 19, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA 2005 amendment to Indiana Code sets aside the common law presumption of undue influence with respect to certain transactions
benefiting an attorney in fact, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today on an issue of first impression.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.