Indiana Supreme Court
Justices hear voter ID case arguments
March 17, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court heard arguments March 4 about the state's controversial voter identification law, and is considering
whether the requirements impose an unconstitutional burden on some voters who can't obtain the necessary photo ID cards.
MoreHigh court rules on prisoners issues
March 11, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court handed down two opinions Wednesday in which the high court expressly adopted the "prison mailbox
rule" and determined a majority of the Indiana Parole Board constitutes the full parole board when making final decisions.
MoreJustices disagree about evidence issue
March 5, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard didn't agree with his colleagues' decision that a defendant
couldn't introduce evidence to dispute the judgment of an injured plaintiff's medical providers in choosing certain
treatment.
MoreJustice ponders importance of party-line vote
March 5, 2010
Michael HoskinsAs the Indiana Supreme Court justices considered the constitutionality of the state's voter ID law this week, one jurist
wondered how much the legislative process might factor into the court's analysis of whether a statute is constitutional.
MoreCourt hears state voter ID case
March 4, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court on Thursday morning sharply questioned attorneys about the state's five-year-old voter identification
law, debating whether the requirements impose an unconstitutional burden on some voters who can't obtain the necessary
photo ID.
MoreDecision resolves conflicting appellate rulings
March 3, 2010
Jennifer NelsonAn offense of attempted dissemination of matter harmful to minors can be committed when a defendant attempts to transmit prohibited
matter by the Internet to an adult police detective posing as a minor, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.
MoreLegislature, courts navigate uncertainty about registry laws
March 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsHoosier lawmakers are revising state law following the confusion created by an Indiana Supreme Court ruling last year, which
involves how convicted sex offenders can be removed from a statewide registry if they believe registration wasn't required
at the time of their conviction.
MoreStates mull attorneys' designation
March 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsFor years, Indianapolis attorney Scott Montross has been a Super Lawyer. He's been on the list and for the most part has
been one of the top designees in the state time and time again.
MoreJustice honored for commitment to diversity
March 2, 2010
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. will be honored with an American Bar Association Section of Litigation's
2010 Diversity Leadership Award next month. The award honors those who have demonstrated a commitment to promoting diversity
in the legal profession.
MoreHigh court grants 6 transfers
March 1, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer today to decide whether casinos can ban card counters. The high court also granted
transfer to five cases Thursday, including a case of first impression regarding post-retirement health-insurance premiums.
MoreHigh court adopts COA opinion in billing dispute
February 25, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer Wednesday in a dispute over who bears the burden to prove "pecuniary liability"
under the Worker's Compensation Act, and adopted the Indiana Court of Appeals' opinion on the matter.
MoreHigh court defines 'briefly'
February 23, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIn two cases involving a statutory defense to possession or dealing of drugs within 1,000 feet of a school, the Indiana Supreme
Court defined the term "briefly" and ruled on whether the defendants were briefly near schools when they committed
their crimes.
MoreRush County courts join Odyssey
February 19, 2010
IL StaffThe Rush Superior and Circuit Courts and clerk's office have gone online on Odyssey, the Indiana Supreme Court's case
management system.
MoreCommission starts review process for new disciplinary chief
February 18, 2010
Michael HoskinsMore than 20 people have applied for the top executive post of the Disciplinary Commission, and the commission now may allow
others to apply while it begins a review process expected to take at least two months.
MoreHigh court clarifies preliminary injunction issue
February 17, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court issued an opinion today explaining its reasoning for granting a permanent writ of mandamus last
year against Clark Circuit Court.
MoreLittle court guidance on repressed memory litigation results in trial court split
February 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsReaching into a person's mind to revive repressed memories is an issue that's settled law in one sense,
but what remains unsettled is how such memories are used during litigation and whether a lawsuit should be tossed or allowed
to proceed to trial.
MoreAppellate Clerk's Office no longer sending rulings via the Postal Service.
February 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsAppellate attorneys no longer receive a mailed hard copy of any order issued by Indiana's highest courts. Instead, those
lawyers are now receiving documents in an e-mail.
MoreCourts coping with tough times
February 3, 2010
Michael HoskinsNo one needs to tell Johnson Circuit Judge Mark Loyd how tough times are for the state's court system.
MoreCourt considers broadening emotional distress 'Bystander Rule'
February 3, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerParties are waiting for the Supreme Court's decision following arguments in November in a case where a trial court granted
and the Court of Appeals affirmed an award for emotional distress above and beyond the capped amount in the Adult Wrongful
Death Statute as defined by Indiana Code 34-23-1-2.
More2 counties join Odyssey CMS
January 29, 2010
IL StaffBlackford and Huntington counties'; courts and clerks'; offices are the latest to join the Indiana Supreme Court's Odyssey
case management system.
MoreJustices: Agreement was impermissibly modified
January 28, 2010
Jennifer NelsonA LaPorte Superior judge made an impermissible modification to a divorced couple's settlement agreement by giving
the bank's lien on the family farm priority over the ex-wife's lien, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today.
MoreCounty immunity in weather-related accident
January 27, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment for a county sued as a result of a weather-related accident, holding government
liability immunity in steps taken as a result of the weather lasts until at least the weather condition has stabilized.
MoreHigh court grants transfer to voter ID case
January 25, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court will decide whether the state's voter identification law violates the Indiana Constitution.
MoreJustices take question on salvage statute
January 25, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has accepted a certified question from the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals about a statute on salvage
titles that the federal court deemed ambiguous.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.