Indiana Supreme Court
Court appoints 3 to Disciplinary Commission
August 17, 2009
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court announced today two new appointments to the Disciplinary Commission and the reappointment of one
member.
MoreTransfer granted to sentencing appeal
August 14, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer this week to case in which a defendant believed the trial court abused its discretion
in referring to his Level of Service Inventory-Revised and Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory scores.
MoreCourt: Murderer not eligible for parole
July 31, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled that a man serving two life sentences for his 1975 murder convictions isn't eligible to
seek parole under the laws in effect at the time the murders took place, but could seek clemency though the Indiana Parole
Board.
MoreLaw students complete diversity program
July 31, 2009
IL StaffA program implemented by the state to help minority, low income, or educationally disadvantaged college graduates who will
attend law school and plan to practice in Indiana has wrapped up its annual event.
MoreSupreme Court grants 2 transfers
July 30, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted two transfers this week to cases involving a negligence claim against a grocery store and
subordinated judgment liens.
MoreSupreme Court grants writ of mandamus
July 24, 2009
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court justices unanimously voted to grant a permanent writ of mandamus and prohibition in a case out of Howard
Superior Court.
MoreCounties test expanded protective order registry
July 24, 2009
IL StaffEight Indiana counties will be the first to use the state's expanded electronic protective order registry. The expansion
is a result of a partnership between the Indiana Supreme Court, law enforcement, clerks, and domestic violence groups.
MoreAlarm company's actions not covered by policies
July 21, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court reversed the denial of summary judgment on an insurance company's coverage defenses, ruling
its insured's actions leading to a lawsuit were "errors or omissions," and so weren't covered by the commercial
general liability or umbrella policies.
MoreChief justice honored for helping those in need
July 20, 2009
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard received the Administration on Children, Youth and Families Commissioner's
Award for Indiana from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
MoreFate of courtroom cameras still unknown
July 15, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe federal judge vying to become the next justice on the U.S. Supreme Court favors having cameras in court and says she might
be interested in furthering their use at the nation's highest court that has resisted the idea for decades.
MoreReport issued in UPL claim on trust mill case
July 15, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has never determined whether the money spent during the prosecution of an Unauthorized Practice
of Law claim fits into the "costs and expenses incurred by such a hearing" category, which means that a losing party
pays under Administrative Disciplinary Rule 24.
MoreHigh court grants 5 transfers
July 6, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted five transfers late on July 2, including cases on possession of cocaine in a family housing
complex and "no fault" attendance policies in workplaces.
MoreU.S. judge: Indiana Supreme Court was wrong
July 2, 2009
Michael HoskinsA federal judge has tossed a death row inmate's capital sentence, saying the Indiana Supreme Court was wrong in ruling
the man convicted of a triple murder wasn't prejudiced by having to wear a stun belt in the jury's presence.
MorePhone-a-thon helps 2,000 homeowners
July 2, 2009
Rebecca BerfangerA phone-a-thon June 30 helped 2,000 Indiana homeowners by giving them a chance to get more information if they were afraid
of facing foreclosure or already knew their home was or would likely go into foreclosure.
MoreCourt: daylight saving time not an issue
July 1, 2009
Michael HoskinsA trial judge shouldn't have suppressed a drunk-driving breath test on grounds that a time change interfered with the
prosecution, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled today on an issue of first impression.
MoreJustices rule on residency-restriction law
July 1, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court says the three-year-old state law restricting sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of where
children congregate constitutes an unconstitutional form of retroactive punishment. However, the sex offender who won the
appeal has been dead since September 2008.
MoreHigh court to hear arguments on CHINS case
July 1, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday in a Marion County case dealing with whether a child can be determined
in need of services with respect to one parent but not the other.
MoreShutdown wouldn't cripple legal system
June 30, 2009
Michael HoskinsAs the clock ticked closer to a partial shutdown of state government, the Hoosier legal community received word this afternoon
from the Indiana Supreme Court that trial courts should conduct business as usual and that the state's legal system would
continue as much as possible if lawmakers fail to pass a budget by deadline.
MoreJustices issue ruling in casino revenue case
June 30, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled today on an ongoing appeal about how casino revenue is funneled to a for-profit organization
in East Chicago, an issue that has also been raised in an ongoing federal racketeering suit in northern Indiana.
MoreHigh court rules on putative father adoption case
June 29, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that a putative father who files a paternity action in a court other than the court in
which the adoption case is pending meets statutory requirements and doesn't imply his permanent consent to that adoption.
MoreTransfer sought in compulsive gambling case
June 29, 2009
Michael HoskinsArguing that common law should protect anyone intentionally harmed by someone else, an Evansville attorney is asking the Indiana
Supreme Court to consider a case of first impression in which he contends a compulsive gambler was targeted and taken advantage
of by a casino, resulting in her loss of $125,000 in a single night.
MoreSupreme Court orders third murder trial
June 26, 2009
Michael HoskinsState justices have overturned the murder convictions and ordered a third trial for a former state trooper accused of killing
his wife and two young children in Southern Indiana almost a decade ago.
MoreJustices: Anders withdrawals not allowed
June 26, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has rejected a procedure set up by the nation's top court more than four decades ago that allows
attorneys to withdraw from criminal appeals they deem frivolous. Our justices say it's practically and financially more
efficient to simply proceed with an appeal and let that process play out.
MoreCourt rules in favor of steel company in dispute
June 24, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court affirmed Tuesday the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission's grant of summary judgment in favor
of a steel production facility in a contract dispute involving a public utility.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.