Indianapolis Bar Association

IBA Frontlines

January 18, 2012
News from the IndyBar for Jan. 20-Feb. 2, 2012.
More

Chinn: Opportunities To Serve In 2012

January 18, 2012
Scott Chinn
IBA President Scott Chinn writes his first column about how members can be involved in 2012.
More

2012 IBA Installation Luncheon

January 18, 2012
View photos from the 2012 IBA Installation Luncheon at the Conrad Hotel in Indianapolis.
More

IBA: Attorneys Beware - Conflicts of Interest and Attempts to Make a Buck

January 4, 2012
From IndyBar
Attorneys looking to profit from their experiences at trial take note: the principles behind the so-called “Son of Sam” laws, which prohibit criminal defendants from profiting from the publicity of their crimes, may apply to you too, at least during the pendency of a criminal case.
More

IBA: When Kids Become Adults

January 4, 2012
From IndyBar
Charging juveniles as adults is a topic that has garnered media attention lately with a rash of gun-related deaths among teens. It’s also an area where we need to balance sympathy for the victims and for the minor offenders.
More

Hebenstreit: Thanks

January 4, 2012
Michael Hebenstreit
Three hundred sixty five days sounds like a long time, but 2011 has flown by very quickly. This is my last column in Indiana Lawyer.
More

IBA Frontlines -1/6/12

January 4, 2012
Read news briefs from the IndyBar.
More

IBA: No Better Time to Remember our Soldiers

December 21, 2011
From IndyBar
This year, why not take just a few minutes and a few dollars, and really do something special: remember a deployed American soldier.
More

Hebenstreit: FIGHT ON!

December 21, 2011
Michael Hebenstreit
Less than 24 hours ago, I knew exactly what my topic for this column was going to be.
More

IBA: One Last Gift to Make Before the Holidays End

December 21, 2011
From IndyBar
Pro bono for families and children, leadership training for young lawyers, and legal education are all community services enriched by the charitable dollars gifted to the Indianapolis Bar Foundation.
More

IBA: Volunteer for the IndyBar Hospice Program

December 21, 2011
Looking for a meaningful opportunity for pro bono service? Attorney volunteers are needed for the IndyBar Hospice Program.
More

IBA: Courts Announce Renewal of Attorney Access Cards

December 21, 2011
From IndyBar
The Marion County Court Administrator’s Office has announced the renewal schedule for attorney access cards to the City-County Building.
More

IndyBar 2011 Holiday Party

December 21, 2011
View photos from the 2011 holiday party.
More

IBA: Bar Announces Plans for Judicial Evaluation

December 21, 2011
From IndyBar
The Judicial Excellence Political Action Committee (“JEPAC”) of the Indianapolis Bar Association will begin conducting its evaluation of 2012 candidates for Marion Superior Court at midnight Monday, January 9.
More

IBA Frontlines - 12/21/11

December 21, 2011
From IndyBar
News from the IndyBar for Dec. 21, 2011.
More

IndyBar 2011 Recognition Luncheon

December 7, 2011
From IndyBar
View photos from the 2011 Indianapolis Bar Association Luncheon.
More

IBA Frontlines - Dec. 7, 2011

December 7, 2011
News from the IndyBar, including free CLE being offered.
More

Hebenstreit: Making a Difference in a Child's Life

December 7, 2011
Michael Hebenstreit
IndyBar President Michael Hebenstreit writes about volunteering to be a child advocate or guardian ad litem.
More

IBA: Holidays - Time to Network

December 7, 2011
From IndyBar
Whether it’s your first or twenty-fifth holiday networking season, every member of the legal community can gain a great deal from leaving the desk behind and hitting the party circuit.
More

Indianapolis Bar Foundation Honors Distinguished Fellows

December 7, 2011
From IndyBar
Each year the Indianapolis Bar Foundation honors individuals for their dedication to the law by bestowing on them the designation of Distinguished Fellow.
More

IBA: Making Choices in Mediation

November 23, 2011
From IndyBar
Attorney John Trimble explains that one of the true ironies associated with the popularity of mediation is that many parties are refusing to negotiate outside of mediation.
More

IBA Pro Bono Awards: Meeting the needs of our community

November 23, 2011
From IndyBar
Making a difference in providing free legal assistance to our neighbors in Indianapolis is second nature to this year’s winners of the Indianapolis Bar Association’s Pro Bono Awards.
More

IBA: Recognition and IBF board photos

November 23, 2011
View photos of IBA and IBF honorees.
More

Hebenstreit: Judicial Elections Just Around the Corner

November 23, 2011
Michael Hebenstreit
IBA President Michael Hebenstreit recognizes that the elections are over and everyone wants to get back to normal life again … but the process is beginning again.
More

IBA Frontlines

November 23, 2011
From IndyBar
News from IBA for Nov. 23 - Dec. 6, 2011.
More
Page  << 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> pager
Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT