May 22, 2013
Anthony SchoettleThe NCAA is facing a potential game-changing legal battle that has some colleges worrying their athletic budgets could be
halved.
More
May 22, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlThe Supreme Court of the United States decision upholding the patent owned by Monsanto Co. was surprising only in its unanimous
affirmation.
More
May 13, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA unanimous Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that patent exhaustion doesn’t allow a farmer to reproduce
patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder’s permission.
More
April 10, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlThe historic change in the patent system puts U.S. in step with other industrialized countries.
More
April 10, 2013
Dave StaffordThe Supreme Court of the United States recently heard a government challenge of drugmakers' "pay to delay" practice.
More
January 16, 2013
Chris O'MalleyA trademark-infringement case brought against App Press LLC threatens to smother the tech startup in legal fees before it
reaches its potential. And in a curious twist, the case also has generated grumblings in the tightknit developer community
toward a big law firm that is representing App Press’ opponent in the federal court case.
More
January 7, 2013
Marilyn OdendahlA patent infringement case involving a Knox County soybean farmer and an international seed producer will be argued Feb. 19
before the Supreme Court of the United States.
More
December 4, 2012
IL StaffOne pesky scrivener’s error that altered the protection provided by the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006 has
been corrected thanks to the efforts of an Indiana University professor.
More
October 24, 2012
Marilyn OdendahlThe doctrine of patent exhaustion is at the center of a Knox County dispute involving Monsanto Technology over the use of
seeds.
More
October 8, 2012
Marilyn OdendahlThe Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to review a federal appeals court decision regarding patent infringement
in a case involving an Indiana farmer and a seed producer.
More
September 26, 2012
Dave StaffordThe legal landscape for Marilyn Monroe’s heirs changed considerably when a federal court recently affirmed that the
idol had no right of publicity that survived her.
More
September 26, 2012
Marilyn OdendahlOne addition under the America Invents Act is the public has the opportunity to participate in pre- and post-grant reviews.
More
August 31, 2012
IBJ StaffCMG Worldwide, an intellectual property licensing firm in Fishers, has lost a federal court appeal related to ownership of
iconic images of Marilyn Monroe.
More
August 15, 2012
Wandini RigginsWandini Riggins writes about attorney Trezanay Atikins, whose interests in music and sports led to her launching her own intellectual
property firm.
More
July 24, 2012
IL StaffThe Notre Dame Law School’s Intellectual Property and Entrepreneur Clinic has been selected by the United States Patent
and Trademark Office to take part in the agency’s Patent Law School Clinic Certification Pilot Program beginning this
fall.
More
May 9, 2012
Jenny MontgomeryFans raved about the "hologram" Tupac Shakur's performance at Coachella. For intellectual property lawyers,
Tupac’s virtual return to the stage raises some interesting questions.
More
April 6, 2012
IL StaffA senior-level attorney for the United States Copyright Office will deliver a public talk on April 9 at Indiana University
Maurer School of Law.
More
March 28, 2012
Michael HoskinsPatent attorneys face unique concerns in creating firms.
More
March 28, 2012
Michael HoskinsA New York federal suit challenges publishers' selling of attorneys' work.
More
February 29, 2012
Michael HoskinsAttorneys see a rise in the amount of fraudulent notices clients receive.
More
November 29, 2011
IL StaffThe Intellectual Property Law and Innovation Symposium at Indiana University School of Law – Indianapolis on Dec. 2
will focus on recent changes to IP law created by the America Invents Act.
More
November 21, 2011
IL StaffThe Notre Dame Legal Clinics are expanding their transactional services to the local business community in January with a
new Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship Clinic headed by intellectual property lawyer Jodi Clifford, who joined the
law school this fall.
More
October 18, 2011
IL StaffA Chinese national and former employee of Dow AgroSciences LLC pleaded guilty Tuesday to economic espionage and theft of trade
secrets in federal court. Kexue Huang’s case is the first prosecution in Indiana for foreign economic espionage.
More
October 12, 2011
Michael HoskinsSome Indiana attorneys think this new first-to-file process will create a race to the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office in
order to obtain patent protection first.
More
October 12, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryPatent attorneys wonder who will benefit from new process.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.