December 28, 2010
Michael HoskinsWhile recognizing that the state’s practice of allowing late introduction of evidence basically rewards attorneys who
don’t prepare for trial, the Indiana Court of Appeals looked beyond that practice in a recent decison to how the rules
still protect a person’s right to a fair trial.
More
December 22, 2010
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals Judge Margret Robb has issued a lengthy dissent from her colleagues’ denial to rehear a case
involving the state’s patient compensation fund. After reviewing the case, she believed the appellate court shouldn’t
have applied Restatement (Second) of Torts Section 323.
More
December 1, 2010
Jennifer NelsonBecause a man’s detention following a traffic stop wasn’t supported by reasonable suspicion, the Indiana Court
of Appeals reversed his drug conviction today.
More
November 4, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals declined to address whether a pro se prisoner is “incapacitated” for purposes of
the Indiana Tort Claims Act in a man’s appeal of his suit involving false arrest and false imprisonment.
More
November 3, 2010
IL StaffThe 11 judges up for retention this year – including five on the Indiana Court of Appeals – will remain on the
bench.
More
October 28, 2010
IL StaffNext year, the Indiana Court of Appeals will have its first woman chief judge.
More
October 26, 2010
Rebecca BerfangerThe Indiana Court of Appeals today reversed an order from Lake Superior Court that granted a motion to compel the production
of documents from the appellant-defendant Allstate Insurance Company.
More
October 22, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments in Rushville and Greencastle next week as part of its “Appeals on Wheels”
initiative.
More
October 21, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals split today on whether a woman’s conviction of Class B misdemeanor public intoxication
should be reversed because she wasn’t in a public place within the meaning of Indiana Code at the time police stopped
her car.
More
October 14, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals addressed the interplay between sections 6 and 10 of Indiana Code 31-37-19 governing juvenile
commitment for the first time today. The judges noted when they are applied separately the sections produce opposite results
regarding the purpose of the statutes.
More
October 13, 2010
IL StaffIf the results of the Indiana State Bar Association’s 2010 Judicial Retention Poll are any indicator of next month’s
election, then the five Indiana Court of Appeals judges up for a vote will be easily retained.
More
October 13, 2010
Michael HoskinsOne third of the Indiana Court of Appeals judges face a retention vote this year. Read the judges’ answers to questions
posed by Indiana Lawyer.
More
October 8, 2010
Jennifer NelsonRuling on the issue for the first time, the Indiana Court of Appeals has held that a military spouse may not, by a post-decree
waiver of retirement pay in favor of disability benefits or combat-related special compensation, unilaterally and voluntarily
reduce the benefits awarded to the former spouse in a dissolution decree.
More
August 16, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment in favor of an attorney and law firm in a legal malpractice suit, although
the judges didn’t agree on the professional obligations of the firm based on its contract.
More
August 16, 2010
Jennifer NelsonRuling on the state’s Equine Activity Statute for the first time, the Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the statute
barred a woman’s claim for injuries during a horse competition.
More
July 6, 2010
Elizabeth BrockettOn a rehearing petition from the state, the Indiana Court of Appeals reaffirmed today its holding in reversing a conviction
based on a traffic stop involving a canine sniff.
More
January 19, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals split today in its decision of who should receive back child support payments from a father who
kidnapped his son for 16 years before turning himself in when the son was 23 years old.
More
December 30, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA construction company's attempt to cast itself in the same class of professionals as attorneys or architects was rejected
by the Indiana Court of Appeals today. The appellate court upheld on interlocutory appeal the denial of the company's
motion for summary judgment in a breach of contract complaint.
More
November 13, 2009
Jennifer NelsonAn Indiana trial court erred when it denied a defendant's motion to suppress evidence because the good-faith exception
doesn't apply in this case, the Indiana Court of Appeals concluded today.
More
August 4, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the denial of a motion for discharge pursuant to Criminal Rule 4(C) because the court
incorrectly attributed delays to the defendant.
More
June 2, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a motion of summary judgment by a father accused of molesting two of his
adopted sons when they were children.
More
May 4, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of a prisoner's pro se action for a mandate requiring all five parole
board members to vote on his parole eligibility, ruling the prisoner's case was supported by Indiana statute.
More
March 31, 2009
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals determined in a case of first impression that the state's 'non-suspension rule' in
Indiana Code depends on the status of the prior criminal conviction at the time of sentencing for a subsequent conviction.
More
February 11, 2009
Jennifer MehalikThe Indiana Court of Appeals reversed and remanded a trial court's grant of an ex-wife's petition for additional relief
for funds, finding the trial court didn't hear evidence on certain "critical" factors. The judges on appeal
didn't agree as to whether the case should be remanded.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.