Judge Terry A. Crone
Casino wins compulsive gambling appeal
March 20, 2009
Michael HoskinsCasinos don't have a common law duty to protect compulsive gamblers from themselves, and aren't required to refrain
from trying to entice those people into their establishments, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled today in a matter of first
impression.
MoreeBay suit presents issue of first impression
March 13, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn an issue of first impression in Indiana - and possibly in the United States - the Indiana Court of Appeals addressed specific
jurisdiction questions in a suit filed by sellers on the online auction site, eBay.
MoreMan isn't entitled to parental privilege defense
March 4, 2009
Jennifer NelsonIn an issue of first impression, the Indiana Court of Appeals had to decide whether a defendant who lived in a woman's
home in exchange for babysitting her children would fall under the parental privilege defense for disciplining a child.
MoreOpinion examines history of Fireman's Rule
February 13, 2009
Jennifer NelsonAfter delving into the history of caselaw involving Indiana's Fireman's Rule, the Indiana Court of Appeals determined
a couple's complaint against an Indianapolis strip club is barred by the rule.
MoreCOA upholds violent offender registration
December 29, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed that the state's sex and violent offender registry doesn't violate the Indiana
Constitution by requiring violent offenders to register for a 10-year period or for life.
MoreCOA: Warrant didn't need to be admitted
December 22, 2008
Rebecca BerfangerIn a case of first impression involving whether an active arrest warrant must be admitted into evidence when the defendant
has not challenged the warrant's validity, the Court of Appeals has affirmed an appellant-defendant's conviction of
Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana that an officer discovered during a routine traffic stop.
MoreCOA: Award fees for litigation costs
October 9, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals instructed a trial court today to follow its guidance on remand to determine the amount of money
to award to a man who wants to recover fees for litigation at the trial and appellate levels. The court hopes to avoid another
appeal of the case.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
-
Mediation space key to resolution, even if it’s a getaway divorce
Court Calendar
-
May 22, 2013 Floyd Weddle v. State of Indiana - 5/22/13
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...