December 3, 2012
IL StaffRetired Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. has been appointed to the Indiana Business Law Survey Commission.
More
August 8, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission has selected the three finalists for the Supreme Court vacancy: Hamilton Superior
Judge Steve Nation, Tippecanoe Superior Judge Loretta Rush, and attorney Geoffrey Slaughter. The commission had whittled down
the number of applicants from 22 to 10 in July, and then to three Wednesday evening.
More
August 8, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commissions has finished interviewing the semifinalists who want to replace Frank Sullivan
Jr. on the Supreme Court. The commission went into executive session around 4 p.m. Wednesday.
More
August 8, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission Wednesday interviewed 10 semifinalists to fill the vacancy on the Indiana Supreme
Court created by the retirement of Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. Commission chair and Supreme Court Chief Justice Brent Dickson
opened the interviews by asking each candidate what factors he or she believed the commission should be looking for in a justice.
More
August 1, 2012
Dave StaffordJustice Frank Sullivan Jr. has departed the Indiana Supreme Court and officially joined the faculty of Indiana University
Robert H. McKinney School of Law in Indianapolis.
More
August 1, 2012
Dave StaffordAfter public interviews, who makes the cut is determined behind closed doors. So what happens when those doors close?
More
August 1, 2012
Dave StaffordMeet the 10 semifinalists who hope to replace Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. on the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
July 18, 2012
IL StaffSix women and four men are semifinalists for appointment to the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
July 4, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Randall Shepard era of Indiana’s Supreme Court is over, but in his last full year on the court, the former chief
justice continued a legacy of consensus building and restoring primacy to the state Constitution.
More
June 29, 2012
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission received 22 applications from attorneys and judges interested in becoming the state’s
next Supreme Court justice.
More
June 20, 2012
Dave StaffordA woman sentenced to 55 years in prison for her role in a 2010 murder lost an appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday.
More
April 26, 2012
Jennifer NelsonIf you’re an attorney in Indiana, chances are you received an email from acting Chief Justice Brent Dickson Wednesday.
Dickson sent the email to the legal community encouraging lawyers to apply for the upcoming vacancy on the Supreme Court.
More
April 11, 2012
Michael HoskinsSullivan's departure marks the Indiana Supreme Court's third vacancy in two years.
More
April 2, 2012
Michael HoskinsJustice Frank Sullivan will leave the Indiana Supreme Court to teach business law and corporate finance at Indiana University
Robert H. McKinney School of Law.
More
March 26, 2012
Michael HoskinsThe Supreme Court of the United States won’t take an Indiana case asking whether a defendant’s second trial was barred by
the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment, and so a state Supreme Court decision on the issue will stand.
More
August 25, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Commission on Courts meeting Wednesday contained some familiar elements: Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan
testified regarding Odyssey and two trial judges have once again asked for an additional judicial officer.
More
August 18, 2011
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr. will join judges and the clerk of Steuben County on August 22 to demonstrate
Odyssey, a new case management system.
More
June 29, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled 4-1 that classifying a man as a sexually violent predator due to an amendment to the Sex Offender
Registration Act doesn’t violate Indiana’s prohibition of ex post facto laws or the doctrine of separation of
powers.
More
June 28, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court found that an enhanced sentence for a man convicted of nine counts of molesting his girlfriend’s
young daughter is warranted, but reduced the man’s 324-year sentence to 110 years.
More
June 22, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has found that a juvenile court didn’t err in admitting a teen’s confession, finding
the boy was given the opportunity for meaningful consultation with his mother and that he knowingly waived his rights. The
justices did also emphasize that the waiver used should be altered to make it more clear.
More
June 22, 2011
Michael HoskinsWelcoming a new justice was undeniably the most notable moment for the Indiana Supreme Court in 2010. That lineup change captured
the headlines, but it’s not the only item of interest for Indiana court-watchers.
More
June 8, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe failure of a judge to inquire into a defendant’s written complaint about his public defender didn’t violate
the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, the Indiana Supreme Court held Wednesday.
However, the justices explained if a trial judge finds him or herself in a situation similar to the one presented, that judge
should at least receive assurances from the public defender’s office that the complaint has been adequately addressed.
More
June 1, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court was divided Wednesday in an opinion regarding whether a man could be charged with Class C felony
child molesting 16 years after he last molested his stepniece.
More
May 25, 2011
Michael HoskinsNearly 300 people gathered on the steps of the Indiana Statehouse Wednesday, many calling for the recall of Indiana Supreme
Court Justice Steven H. David. Justice David authored the recent high court ruling that held individuals don’t have
the right to resist police who enter their home, even if those entries are illegal.
More
May 12, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court split Thursday on whether the attorney general’s attempt to recover an erroneously issued
“tax refund” to a company should proceed in state court or in the Indiana Tax Court.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!