Justice Steven H. David
David, Rush appointed as liaisons for juvenile program
December 10, 2012
IL StaffChief Justice Brent Dickson has appointed Justices Steven David and Loretta H. Rush to serve as the Indiana Supreme Court’s
liaison representatives to the Court Improvement Program executive committee.
MoreAll appellate judges on the ballot retained by voters
November 7, 2012
IL StaffCollecting more than a million “yes” votes each, Indiana Justices Steven David and Robert Rucker have been retained
in office. David faced opposition from some who disagreed with the majority opinion he authored regarding unlawful police
entry into homes.
MoreTea party radio ad opposes David’s retention; Shepard gives backing
November 2, 2012
Dave StaffordIndianapolis Tea Party Corp. has produced a radio advertisement critical of Justice Steven David ahead of his retention vote
on Tuesday.
MoreSigns of dissent in retention vote
October 24, 2012
Dave StaffordJustice Steven David's Barnes opinion finding no right to resist unlawful police entry results in an unusual
ouster effort on an otherwise quiet appellate judicial ballot.
MoreJustice David creates retention website
October 22, 2012
Dave StaffordFacing opposition over an opinion regarding unlawful police entry, Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David has established
a website in an unusual effort to campaign for retention.
MoreDavid named to chair Allen County JNC
September 11, 2012
IL StaffIndiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David has been appointed to chair the Allen Superior Court Judicial Nominating Commission.
MoreJustice David to head panel at NWI pro bono event
July 18, 2012
IL StaffIndiana Justice Steven David, appellate Judge Melissa May and lawyers and judges from Pro Bono District A, will be among the
presenters at a day-long CLE event July 27 at Valparaiso University Law School. “A Potpourri of Timely Topics”
is co-sponsored by the law school and NWI Volunteer Lawyers Inc., the District A pro bono project.
MoreSupreme Court review focuses on Shepard's legacy
July 4, 2012
Dave StaffordThe Randall Shepard era of Indiana’s Supreme Court is over, but in his last full year on the court, the former chief
justice continued a legacy of consensus building and restoring primacy to the state Constitution.
MoreLawyers sweat it out in ethics CLE
February 15, 2012
Jenny MontgomerySneakers, shorts and T-shirts aren’t what most attorneys typically wear to continuing legal education sessions. But
on Jan. 30, lawyers put on their workout gear and hit the gym for a one-hour CLE on ethics.
MoreJustices: court could impose only 1 juvenile commitment
November 17, 2011
Jenny MontgomeryThe Indiana Supreme Court has issued an opinion affirming that a juvenile may not be sentenced to both a determinate and indeterminate
commitment.
MoreRookie year on the Supreme Court
November 9, 2011
Michael HoskinsNew Indiana Justice Steven David is settled but still finding his niche.
MoreJustices clarify police resistance ruling
September 28, 2011
Michael HoskinsEmphasizing that it’s not trampling on the Fourth Amendment and allowing police to illegally enter one’s home,
the Indiana Supreme Court has revisited a case it decided four months ago and reinforced its ruling that residents don’t
have a common law right to resist police entering one’s home.
MoreSupreme Court upholds Barnes ruling
September 20, 2011
Michael HoskinsEmphasizing that it’s not trampling on the Fourth Amendment, the Indiana Supreme Court has revisited a ruling it made
four months ago and upheld its holding that residents don’t have a common law right to resist police entering a person’s
home.
MoreJustices stand firm on Barnes decision
September 20, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has revisited a ruling it made four months ago in Richard Barnes v. State, affirming its
initial holding that residents do not have a common law right to resist police in any situation.
MoreAG: DCS out-of-state placements shouldn’t be reviewable by courts
August 4, 2011
Michael HoskinsAn Indiana Supreme Court decision upholding three statutes relating to juvenile judges’ authority on out-of-state placement
cases created what the state attorney general’s office calls too much confusion, and the justices should revisit the
ruling it made a little more than a month ago.
MoreLawmakers discuss scope of police entry case
June 30, 2011
Michael HoskinsA Bedford lawyer-legislator says a recent Indiana Supreme Court decision on resisting police entry has resulted in more feedback
from attorneys and residents statewide than he’s experienced since the daylight saving time debate.
MoreHigh court divided on revising molester's sentence
June 30, 2011
Jennifer NelsonTwo justices dissented from their colleague’s decision to reduce a child molester’s sentence more than 50 years,
believing the opinion “blurs the guidance” given in a 2008 opinion regarding sentence reviews.
MoreAnnual Supreme Court review shows more agreement, shifts in alignment
June 22, 2011
Michael HoskinsWelcoming a new justice was undeniably the most notable moment for the Indiana Supreme Court in 2010. That lineup change captured
the headlines, but it’s not the only item of interest for Indiana court-watchers.
MoreTouched by controversy
June 8, 2011
Michael HoskinsIn the history of court controversies, a recent ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court has created public outcry and calls for
change in ways that few others do.
MoreJustices rule: No right to resist
June 8, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court caught many people off guard when it abolished the common law right of citizens to reasonably resist
police from entering their homes, no matter the situation and regardless of whether the entry is legal.
MoreHigh court splits on molestation conviction
June 1, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court was divided Wednesday in an opinion regarding whether a man could be charged with Class C felony
child molesting 16 years after he last molested his stepniece.
MoreJustices rule on first impression issue involving sentence modification
May 26, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court handed down two opinions Thursday afternoon in which the justices found the trial judges involved
erred in modifying the defendants’ sentences from Class D felonies to Class A misdemeanors.
MoreHundreds gather for rally against Indiana Supreme Court ruling
May 25, 2011
Michael HoskinsNearly 300 people gathered on the steps of the Indiana Statehouse Wednesday, many calling for the recall of Indiana Supreme
Court Justice Steven H. David. Justice David authored the recent high court ruling that held individuals don’t have
the right to resist police who enter their home, even if those entries are illegal.
MoreISBA responds to fallout from split Supreme Court ruling
May 20, 2011
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana State Bar Association issued a statement today addressing the outrage being expressed by many people concerning
a state Supreme Court decision last week, which held individuals don’t have the right to resist police who enter private
residences, even if those entries are illegal.
MoreSupreme Court receives threats after ruling
May 17, 2011
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court has received threatening calls and emails following a ruling last week in which the high court said
Hoosiers can’t resist unlawful entry into their homes by police.
More
Sponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
Longest-practicing female attorney in Indiana has no plans to retire
-
Criminal code and expungement bills signed by governor
-
Lawyer who emailed nude film clip to harm ex-intern suspended 3 years
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
Court Calendar
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
-
June 18, 2013 State of Indiana v. Robert Owens - 6/18/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.