Lawrenceburg
Judges order proceedings on guarantors’ liability
August 15, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a dispute between a company and its mortgage holder regarding
how money received from the city of Lawrenceburg as part of a settlement should be applied to the mortgage.
MoreJustices rule on casino land-ownership dispute
April 20, 2010
Michael HoskinsA land-ownership dispute about an Ohio River riverboat-casino docking site is the subject of an Indiana Supreme Court ruling
today, touching on land deeds from the 1800s and who had the right to use and give away ownership of less than an acre of
land.
MoreMan sues after forced catheterization
September 1, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA Lawrenceburg man has filed a suit against a police officer and others because he says he was given a catheter against his
will to get a urine sample.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Indianapolis law firm Stewart & Irwin closing
-
SCOTUS rules against Indiana farmer in seed patent case
-
More than half of Conour’s inventoried assets gone, feds say
-
Social media sleuths find evidence, but admissibility requires authentication
-
Mediation space key to resolution, even if it’s a getaway divorce
Court Calendar
-
May 22, 2013 Floyd Weddle v. State of Indiana - 5/22/13
-
May 24, 2013 Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Judy Holcomb, Personal Representative of the Estate of Mable Louise Cochran, deceased - 5/24/13
-
May 28, 2013 The Estate of Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C., v. Lax, Inc., and David Lasco - 5/28/13
-
June 12, 2013 Northern Assurance Company of America v. Thomson, Inc., et al. - 6/12/13
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!