Leadership in Law 2013

Leadership in Law 2013: Hon. Lloyd Mark Bailey

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: William Bock III

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: David J. Cutshaw

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Michael F. Drewry

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Ronald E. Elberger

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Joseph R. Fullenkamp

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Hon. Calvin D. Hawkins

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: James D. Johnson

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Kevin P. McGoff

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Gary R. Roberts

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Larry J. Stroble

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: J. Joseph Tanner

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Rhett L. Tauber

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Richard A. Waples

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Judy L. Woods

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Katherine A. Brown-Henry

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Briana Clark

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Daniel P. Cory

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Sarah B. Dauer

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Dustin R. DeNeal

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Timothy A. Emerick

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Oni N. Harton

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Casey C. Kannenberg

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: Anna (Obergfell) Kirkman

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2013: David P. Lynch

April 24, 2013
IL StaffMore
Page  1 2 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Mr. Ricker, how foolish of you to think that by complying with the law you would be ok. Don't you know that Indiana is a state that welcomes monopolies, and that Indiana's legislature is the one entity in this state that believes monopolistic practices (such as those engaged in by Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers) make Indiana a "business-friendly" state? How can you not see this????

  2. Actually, and most strikingly, the ruling failed to address the central issue to the whole case: Namely, Black Knight/LPS, who was NEVER a party to the State court litigation, and who is under a 2013 consent judgment in Indiana (where it has stipulated to the forgery of loan documents, the ones specifically at issue in my case)never disclosed itself in State court or remediated the forged loan documents as was REQUIRED of them by the CJ. In essence, what the court is willfully ignoring, is that it is setting a precedent that the supplier of a defective product, one whom is under a consent judgment stipulating to such, and under obligation to remediate said defective product, can: 1.) Ignore the CJ 2.) Allow counsel to commit fraud on the state court 3.) Then try to hide behind Rooker Feldman doctrine as a bar to being held culpable in federal court. The problem here is the court is in direct conflict with its own ruling(s) in Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings & Iqbal- 780 F.3d 728, at 730 “What Johnson adds - what the defendants in this suit have failed to appreciate—is that federal courts retain jurisdiction to award damages for fraud that imposes extrajudicial injury. The Supreme Court drew that very line in Exxon Mobil ... Iqbal alleges that the defendants conducted a racketeering enterprise that predates the state court’s judgments ...but Exxon Mobil shows that the Rooker Feldman doctrine asks what injury the plaintiff asks the federal court to redress, not whether the injury is “intertwined” with something else …Because Iqbal seeks damages for activity that (he alleges) predates the state litigation and caused injury independently of it, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not block this suit. It must be reinstated.” So, as I already noted to others, I now have the chance to bring my case to SCOTUS; the ruling by Wood & Posner is flawed on numerous levels,BUT most troubling is the fact that the authors KNOW it's a flawed ruling and choose to ignore the flaws for one simple reason: The courts have decided to agree with former AG Eric Holder that national banks "Are too big to fail" and must win at any cost-even that of due process, case precedent, & the truth....Let's see if SCOTUS wants a bite at the apple.

  3. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  4. I am in NJ & just found out that there is a judgment against me in an action by Driver's Solutions LLC in IN. I was never served with any Court pleadings, etc. and the only thing that I can find out is that they were using an old Staten Island NY address for me. I have been in NJ for over 20 years and cannot get any response from Drivers Solutions in IN. They have a different lawyer now. I need to get this vacated or stopped - it is now almost double & at 18%. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

  5. Please I need help with my class action lawsuits, im currently in pro-se and im having hard time findiNG A LAWYER TO ASSIST ME

ADVERTISEMENT