Leadership in Law

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Jamie Andree

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Hon. Michael Barnes

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Hon. Nancy Eshcoff Boyer

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Douglas R. Brown

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Lee C. Christie

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Julie M. Conrad

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Jeffrey S. Dible

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Thomas “Buddy” Downs

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Thomas C. Froehle

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Michael J. Harrington

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Kenneth D. Isley

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Karl Mulvaney

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Martha T. Starkey

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Greg Zoeller

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Jenai M. Brackett

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Kayla D. Britton

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Caitlin R. Byczko

May 3, 2017
More

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Colin E. Connor

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Amy K. Cornell

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Trisha S. Dudlo

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Jared P. Haller

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: James Hamstra

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Jonathan A. Knoll

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Erik B. Long

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2017: Mallory Long

May 3, 2017
IL StaffMore
Page  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Don't we have bigger issues to concern ourselves with?

  2. Anyone who takes the time to study disciplinary and bar admission cases in Indiana ... much of which is, as a matter of course and by intent, off the record, would have a very difficult time drawing lines that did not take into account things which are not supposed to matter, such as affiliations, associations, associates and the like. Justice Hoosier style is a far departure than what issues in most other parts of North America. (More like Central America, in fact.) See, e.g., http://www.theindianalawyer.com/indiana-attorney-illegally-practicing-in-florida-suspended-for-18-months/PARAMS/article/42200 When while the Indiana court system end the cruel practice of killing prophets of due process and those advocating for blind justice?

  3. Wouldn't this call for an investigation of Government corruption? Chief Justice Loretta Rush, wrote that the case warranted the high court’s review because the method the Indiana Court of Appeals used to reach its decision was “a significant departure from the law.” Specifically, David wrote that the appellate panel ruled after reweighing of the evidence, which is NOT permissible at the appellate level. **But yet, they look the other way while an innocent child was taken by a loving mother who did nothing wrong"

  4. Different rules for different folks....

  5. I would strongly suggest anyone seeking mediation check the experience of the mediator. There are retired judges who decide to become mediators. Their training and experience is in making rulings which is not the point of mediation.

ADVERTISEMENT