Leadership in Law

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2016: Andrew M. McCoy

May 4, 2016
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2016: Ashley N. Osak

May 4, 2016
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2016: Jennifer Tudor Wright

May 4, 2016
IL StaffMore

LEADERSHIP IN LAW 2016: Philip Zimmerly

May 4, 2016
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Jarrell B. Hammond

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Richard L. Hill

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Frank J. Deveau

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Hon. Sheila M. Corcoran

May 5, 2015
IBJ StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: S. Curtis DeVoe

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Betsy K. Greene

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Elliott D. Levin

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Zeff A. Weiss, In Memoriam (1957-2014)

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Brian P. Williams

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Tiffany D. Presley

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Ryan M. Schulz

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Michael J. Hebenstreit

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Christine Hayes Hickey

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Gregory L. Laker

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Samuel Laurin

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Hon. Melissa S. May

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Stephen M. Terrell

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Kenneth J. Yerkes

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Angela B. Freeman

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Katherine G. Erdel

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore

Leadership in Law 2015: Roxana S. Bell

May 5, 2015
IL StaffMore
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 6 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. Other than a complete lack of any verifiable and valid historical citations to back your wild context-free accusations, you also forget to allege "ate Native American children, ate slave children, ate their own children, and often did it all while using salad forks rather than dinner forks." (gasp)

  2. "So we broke with England for the right to "off" our preborn progeny at will, and allow the processing plant doing the dirty deeds (dirt cheap) to profit on the marketing of those "products of conception." I was completely maleducated on our nation's founding, it would seem. (But I know the ACLU is hard at work to remedy that, too.)" Well, you know, we're just following in the footsteps of our founders who raped women, raped slaves, raped children, maimed immigrants, sold children, stole property, broke promises, broke apart families, killed natives... You know, good God fearing down home Christian folk! :/

  3. Who gives a rats behind about all the fluffy ranking nonsense. What students having to pay off debt need to know is that all schools aren't created equal and students from many schools don't have a snowball's chance of getting a decent paying job straight out of law school. Their lowly ranked lawschool won't tell them that though. When schools start honestly (accurately) reporting *those numbers, things will get interesting real quick, and the looks on student's faces will be priceless!

  4. Whilst it may be true that Judges and Justices enjoy such freedom of time and effort, it certainly does not hold true for the average working person. To say that one must 1) take a day or a half day off work every 3 months, 2) gather a list of information including recent photographs, and 3) set up a time that is convenient for the local sheriff or other such office to complete the registry is more than a bit near-sighted. This may be procedural, and hence, in the near-sighted minds of the court, not 'punishment,' but it is in fact 'punishment.' The local sheriffs probably feel a little punished too by the overwork. Registries serve to punish the offender whilst simultaneously providing the public at large with a false sense of security. The false sense of security is dangerous to the public who may not exercise due diligence by thinking there are no offenders in their locale. In fact, the registry only informs them of those who have been convicted.

  5. Unfortunately, the court doesn't understand the difference between ebidta and adjusted ebidta as they clearly got the ruling wrong based on their misunderstanding

ADVERTISEMENT