January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsLaser hair removal isn't considered "health care" within the meaning of the state's Medical Malpractice Act, the Indiana Court
of Appeals ruled today.A unanimous ruling today affirmed a trial court decision in OB-GYN Associates of Northern Indiana P.C.
v. Tammy Ransbottom, No. 71A03-0711-CV-503, which involved a St. Joseph County case and the denial of a motion to dismiss
a negligence action. In January 2006, Ransbottom had gone to a Mishawaka OB-GYN's office and underwent the cosmetic laser
hair removal treatment. She went...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals will hear arguments Feb. 26 at Wabash College in Crawfordsville. Judges Patricia Riley, James
Kirsch, and Melissa May will hear the appeal from Monroe Circuit Court of H.D., et al. v. BHC Meadows Hospital, Inc. at 3
p.m. In this appeal, the court is asked to decide whether the Indiana Medical Malpractice Act requires a juvenile and his
or her parents to bring claims from a breach of patient confidentiality before a medical review panel prior...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals upheld a damages award to the parents of a stillborn child against a doctor, finding the trial
court properly excluded opinion testimony from two treating doctors and a letter written to those doctors before the trial
by the parents' attorney. In Jeffrey L. Cain, M.D. v. Richard Back and Suzette Back, No. 20A03-0705-CV-225, Dr. Jeffrey
L. Cain appealed the trial court judgment of $800,000 in damages to Richard and Suzette Back on their claim of medical malpractice.The...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court granted transfer to a case regarding whether the Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund can introduce
evidence of liability on an action seeking excess damages. The court also vacated a transfer in a case that involves an amendment
to charging information that happened after the omnibus date. The court granted transfer to Jim Atterholt, Commissioner of
the Indiana Department of Insurance, as Administrator of theIndiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Geneva Herbst, personal
representative of the estate of Jeffrey A....
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonIndiana Court of Appeals judges were split in their decision March 12 regarding whether a hospital that performed
a surgery on a woman with suspected domestic violence injuries should have prevented her from leaving with her ex-husband
and alleged abuser, who later killed both of them on the way home from the hospital. At issue in Ava McSwane and Danielle
Hays v. Bloomington Hospital and Healthcare System and Jean M. Eelma, M.D., No. 53A04-0705-CV-243, is what duty the hospital
owed to McSwane's daughter, Malia...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonA doctor cannot use evidence of a patient's previous surgeries or pursue an incurred-risk defense against a medical malpractice
suit, the Court of Appeals ruled today. In Brenda Spar v. Jin S. Cha, M.D., No. 45A05-0611-CV-683, Spar appealed the
jury decision in favor of Dr. Cha in her medical malpractice claim against the OB/GYN for a surgery he performed on her. Spar
previously had been in a serious automobile accident and as a result had numerous abdominal surgeries. When she decided to...
More
January 1, 2008
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed a trial court decision that excluded arguments and evidence from the Indiana Patient's
Compensation Fund relating to the survival rate of the decedent because their argument regarded liability, which had already
been established through a settlement. In Jim Atterholt, Commissioner of the Indiana Department of Insurance as Administrator
of the Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund v. Geneva Herbst, personal representative of the estate of Jeffrey A. Herbst, No.
49A04-0702-CV-106, the Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund appealed the grant...
More
January 1, 2008
Michael HoskinsAn Indianapolis law firm has been holding its breath for two years. Ever since getting hit with a potentially devastating
$17.9 million jury verdict on a legal malpractice claim in state court, the 45-year-old law firm Fillenwarth Dennerline Groth
& Towe hasn't been able to put the focus on its daily client business without acknowledging that dark storm cloud hovering
overhead. Now, the storm cloud has dissolved. In what may be the state's largest-ever liquidation return of its kind, the
Indiana...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsMedical malpractice attorneys are sighing in relief after a much-anticipated ruling by the Indiana Supreme Court this afternoon.Justices
granted transfer and issued a per curiam opinion this afternoon on a case that had the potential to dramatically change how
med mal attorneys recover fees in these types of cases.But instead of altering that, the unanimous ruling stipulates that
the fee structure often used by these med mal attorneys can stand, and the court offers guidance for attorneys seeking to
ensure fee...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsA mobile home demolished more than a year ago is the subject of one of several oral arguments the Indiana Supreme Court will
hear this week.Justices will hear three cases Tuesday, and two more are scheduled for Thursday, but the court has granted
transfer in only two of those cases so far.The mobile home-related argument tomorrow is in Ernestine Waldon v. Donna Wilkins,
18A04-0604-CV-199, which comes out of Delaware County. After deciding a mobile home was unfit to live in, the...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Supreme Court ruled that summary judgment should not have been granted because it prohibited a doctor from asserting
a statutory negligence claim against a medical malpractice claimant, her attorney, and her attorney's law firm.In the ruling
Wednesday, Justices Brent Dickson and Ted Boehm concurred, with Chief Justice Randall Shepard concurring in a separate opinion.
Justice Frank Sullivan concurred in part and dissented in part with a separate opinion in which Justice Robert Rucker concurred.In
Eusebio Kho M.D. v Deborah...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsIndiana's top jurists granted transfer Wednesday in five cases and will consider issues involving physicians who leave foreign
objects in a patient's body, parental termination hearings conducted without the parent, timely court-filing deadlines, and
the sentencing options courts have after probation violations.In Russell Prewitt v. State of Indiana, No. 10A04-0610-CR-589,
the Court of Appeals in April reversed a Clark County case in which the judge revised a sentence after the defendant violated
his probation. The appellate judges held that the lower...
More
January 1, 2007
Jennifer NelsonIndiana's professional statute of limitations does not trump the state's Wrongful Death Act's statute of limitations, ruled
the Indiana Court of Appeals. In The Estate of Martha O'Neal, by personal representative Therese Newkirk v. Bethlehem Woods
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC, No. 90A05-0705-CV-271, the appellate court was asked to decided if the statute
of limitations had expired prior to O'Neal's estate filing a wrongful death complaint against Bethlehem on Oct 22, 2003. O'Neal
was admitted to Bethlehem for rehabilitation on Sept. 10,...
More
January 1, 2007
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Court of Appeals today reversed and remanded to Lake Circuit Court a medical malpractice case, holding that it
is unconstitutional to apply the state statute's "occurrence-based" nature to the man suing a surgeon.In Victor Herron v.
Anthony A. Anigbo, M.D. http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/05230712jsk.pdf , No. 45A03-0608-CV-378, the three-judge
panel ruled the trial court erred in concluding that Herron's discovery date allowed for sufficient knowledge to discover
the malpractice.The suit stems from Herron's fall outside his home and his admittance to a...
More
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.
In regards to bill's comment about trusting the cover meant. We can trust them about as much as we can trust attorneys'.
This is disturbing to learn...
Yikes!