Miami County
COA: Successive Prosecution Statute not applicable to theft case
May 2, 2013
Jennifer NelsonA Howard Superior judge properly refused to dismiss theft charges against a man because, despite the defendant’s arguments
to the contrary, the Howard County charges were not previously prosecuted in Miami County.
MoreMiami Circuit Judge Robert Spahr dies
September 5, 2012
IL StaffMiami Circuit Judge Robert A. Spahr, 66, died Monday at his residence after a brief battle with cancer.
MoreJudges reduce award of damages to fired school employee
June 18, 2012
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that a fired bus driver and custodian for Peru Community Schools is entitled to damages
for wrongful termination, but not the $175,000 a jury awarded him.
MoreCOA upholds $12 garnishment
July 13, 2011
Jennifer NelsonA Miami Circuit Court did not err in its interpretation of a statute involving garnishment of wages when ruling a company
was correctly withholding only $12.17 from an employee, held the Indiana Court of Appeals Wednesday.
MoreElection for judicial commissions member this fall
August 5, 2010
IL StaffThe Indiana Judicial Nominating Commission and Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications are looking for a new attorney
member.
MoreCOA extends judicial immunity to arbitrators
August 3, 2010
Jennifer NelsonThe Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a real estate broker’s action to vacate an arbitration award
to another broker. In doing so, the appellate court extended judicial and quasi-judicial immunity to arbitrators and their
sponsors.
MoreCourt rules on sex offender status decisions
May 17, 2010
Michael HoskinsTackling the issue of who determines whether a convicted sex offender is considered a “sexually violent predator,”
the Indiana Court of Appeals today issued the latest ruling in a line of cases about the state’s sex offender registry
and how convicts’ names are removed.
MoreReport issued in UPL claim on trust mill case
July 15, 2009
Michael HoskinsThe Indiana Supreme Court has never determined whether the money spent during the prosecution of an Unauthorized Practice
of Law claim fits into the "costs and expenses incurred by such a hearing" category, which means that a losing party
pays under Administrative Disciplinary Rule 24.
MoreCommission admonishes Miami Superior judge
January 20, 2009
Jennifer NelsonA Miami Superior judge received a public admonition today from the Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualifications for granting
an ex parte petition in a child custody case. The commission also noted it has repeatedly addressed this type of violation
for years.
MoreGov. names judge to new Miami Superior Court
December 2, 2008
IL StaffMiami Superior Judge Daniel C. Banina has been appointed by Gov. Mitch Daniels as judge of the newly created Miami Superior
Court II. Judge Banina will become judge of the new court Jan. 1.
MoreSponsored by
on Facebook & Twitter
on Facebook & Twitter
Indiana Lawyer on Facebook
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Back to TopCopyright © All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Use.
Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing.
Additional Hosting & Delivery by
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.