January 19, 2011
Michael HoskinsThree years in, and Indiana’s case management system is plugged into about one-third of the state’s courts.
More
December 15, 2010
IL StaffMadison County is the latest county to go online with the Indiana Supreme Court’s Odyssey case management system. The
system connects counties to a network of courts, clerks, law enforcement, and other state agencies.
More
August 26, 2010
Michael HoskinsIf lawmakers during the next legislative session increase a statewide court fee an extra $3, Indiana Supreme Court Justice
Frank Sullivan believes the state can fully implement a case management system in all county courts by June 30, 2017.
More
July 19, 2010
IL StaffClark County is now using the Indiana Supreme Court Case Management System, Odyssey.
More
July 12, 2010
Michael HoskinsThe state judiciary is moving forward with a plan to establish an appellate case management system, which someday could entail
an e-filing system similar to what the federal courts currently have access to.
More
May 3, 2010
IL StaffThe courts in Benton and Carroll counties have joined nearly 50 other courts in the state using the Indiana Supreme Court
Odyssey Case Management System. The courts and clerk’s offices in those counties went online Friday.
More
February 19, 2010
IL StaffThe Rush Superior and Circuit Courts and clerk's office have gone online on Odyssey, the Indiana Supreme Court's case
management system.
More
January 29, 2010
IL StaffBlackford and Huntington counties'; courts and clerks'; offices are the latest to join the Indiana Supreme Court's Odyssey
case management system.
More
October 12, 2009
IL StaffHamilton County will join nearly 40 other courts and 13 counties when it begins using Odyssey, a statewide case management
system provided by the Indiana Supreme Court.
More
May 13, 2009
Michael HoskinsGreenwood City Court is the state's first city or town court to start using a tool that will eventually connect all of
Indiana courts' case management systems.
More
September 22, 2008
IL StaffThe Indiana Supreme Court is one of 13 international finalists being recognized for recent technology efforts, which include
the case management system being phased in statewide to connect all county courts.
More
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.
Forcing a defendant to wear a stun belt, in court or otherwise, is a violation of american principles! It is also unconstitutional!
So, if I save $100.00 cash per week, from my $500.00 per week paycheck, for 50 years, at which time, I will have saved $260,000.00, the government can raid my home and take my money, just by saying it is drug money! Shouldn't the government, have some kind of evidence of drugs, rather, than just saying we are the government and we will take anything you own, anytime we choose? Tyranny is upon us! If you don't know your rights, you don't have any!