On The Move

On the Move - 8/3/12 - 8/16/12

August 1, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, been promoted, or received an award.
More

On the Move - 7/6/12

July 4, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, who's been honored and who's been elected to boards.
More

On The Move - 6/8/12

June 6, 2012
IL Staff
Read who's joined firms in Indiana, been honored, and become partner.
More

On the Move - 5/11/12

May 9, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been honored and joined Indiana firms.
More

On The Move - 4/13/12

April 11, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, been appointed to boards or recently honored.
More

On The Move -3/2/12

February 29, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been promoted, joined an Indiana firm, and been appointed to local boards.
More

On the Move - 2/3/12

February 1, 2012
IL Staff
See who's been promoted or honored recently in the Indiana legal community.
More

On the Move -1/6/12

January 4, 2012
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, what awards attorneys have received and who has been promoted.
More

On The Move - 12/7/11

December 7, 2011
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana law firms, who has opened up a new firm, and what awards attorneys have received.
More

On the Move - 11/9/11

November 9, 2011
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana firms, been appointed, or honored recently.
More

On the Move - 10/12/11

October 12, 2011
IL Staff
See who's joined Indiana firms, been honored and or created new firms.
More

On the Move - 9/14/11

September 14, 2011
IL Staff
See who's been honored or elected.
More

On the Move - 8/17/11

August 17, 2011
IL Staff
See who has joined Indiana firms, who has been honored, and who has opened new locations.
More

On the Move - Aug. 3, 2011

August 3, 2011
IL Staff
Read about new hires, promotions, and honors within the Indiana legal community.
More

On the Move - 7/6/11

July 6, 2011
IL Staff
Read about movement, leadership elections, and honors bestowed in the legal community.
More

On the move - 6/8/21

June 8, 2011
IL Staff
Read news about new hires, promotions, and honors in Indiana's legal community.
More

On the move - 5/11/11

May 11, 2011
IL Staff
Read about who in the Indiana legal community is "On the Move."
More

On The Move - 4/13/11

April 13, 2011
See how's been elected, honored, and promoted.
More

On the Move - 3/2/11

March 2, 2011
IL Staff

See who has been promoted, appointed, and relocated.

More

On The Move - 2/2/11

February 2, 2011
IL Staff
See who's been elected and promoted.
More

On The Move - 1/19/11

January 19, 2011
IL Staff
See who's been elected, honored, or retired.
More

On The Move - 1/5/11

January 5, 2011
IL Staff
Read who's been promoted and who's formed new firms.
More

On The Move - 12/22/10

December 22, 2010
See who's been honored and promoted.
More

On the Move - 11/24/10

November 24, 2010
See who are new to Indiana firms and what attorneys have opened new law firms.
More

On The Move - 10/27/10

October 27, 2010
See who's recently joined firms, won awards, or been appointed to organizations.
More
Page  << 1 2 3 4 5 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. It really doesn't matter what the law IS, if law enforcement refuses to take reports (or take them seriously), if courts refuse to allow unrepresented parties to speak (especially in Small Claims, which is supposedly "informal"). It doesn't matter what the law IS, if constituents are unable to make effective contact or receive any meaningful response from their representatives. Two of our pets were unnecessarily killed; court records reflect that I "abandoned" them. Not so; when I was denied one of them (and my possessions, which by court order I was supposed to be able to remove), I went directly to the court. And earlier, when I tried to have the DV PO extended (it expired while the subject was on probation for violating it), the court denied any extension. The result? Same problems, less than eight hours after expiration. Ironic that the county sheriff was charged (and later pleaded to) with intimidation, but none of his officers seemed interested or capable of taking such a report from a private citizen. When I learned from one officer what I needed to do, I forwarded audio and transcript of one occurrence and my call to law enforcement (before the statute of limitations expired) to the prosecutor's office. I didn't even receive an acknowledgement. Earlier, I'd gone in to the prosecutor's office and been told that the officer's (written) report didn't match what I said occurred. Since I had the audio, I can only say that I have very little faith in Indiana government or law enforcement.

  2. One can only wonder whether Mr. Kimmel was paid for his work by Mr. Burgh ... or whether that bill fell to the citizens of Indiana, many of whom cannot afford attorneys for important matters. It really doesn't take a judge(s) to know that "pavement" can be considered a deadly weapon. It only takes a brain and some education or thought. I'm glad to see the conviction was upheld although sorry to see that the asphalt could even be considered "an issue".

  3. In response to bryanjbrown: thank you for your comment. I am familiar with Paul Ogden (and applaud his assistance to Shirley Justice) and have read of Gary Welsh's (strange) death (and have visited his blog on many occasions). I am not familiar with you (yet). I lived in Kosciusko county, where the sheriff was just removed after pleading in what seems a very "sweetheart" deal. Unfortunately, something NEEDS to change since the attorneys won't (en masse) stand up for ethics (rather making a show to please the "rules" and apparently the judges). I read that many attorneys are underemployed. Seems wisdom would be to cull the herd and get rid of the rotting apples in practice and on the bench, for everyone's sake as well as justice. I'd like to file an attorney complaint, but I have little faith in anything (other than the most flagrant and obvious) resulting in action. My own belief is that if this was medicine, there'd be maimed and injured all over and the carnage caused by "the profession" would be difficult to hide. One can dream ... meanwhile, back to figuring out to file a pro se "motion to dismiss" as well as another court required paper that Indiana is so fond of providing NO resources for (unlike many other states, who don't automatically assume that citizens involved in the court process are scumbags) so that maybe I can get the family law attorney - whose work left me with no settlement, no possessions and resulted in the death of two pets (etc ad nauseum) - to stop abusing the proceedings supplemental and small claims rules and using it as a vehicle for harassment and apparently, amusement.

  4. Been on social security sense sept 2011 2massive strokes open heart surgery and serious ovarian cancer and a blood clot in my lung all in 14 months. Got a letter in may saying that i didn't qualify and it was in form like i just applied ,called social security she said it don't make sense and you are still geting a check in june and i did ,now i get a check from my part D asking for payment for july because there will be no money for my membership, call my prescription coverage part D and confirmed no check will be there.went to social security they didn't want to answer whats going on just said i should of never been on it .no one knows where this letter came from was California im in virginia and been here sense my strokes and vcu filed for my disability i was in the hospital when they did it .It's like it was a error . My ,mothers social security was being handled in that office in California my sister was dealing with it and it had my social security number because she died last year and this letter came out of the same office and it came at the same time i got the letter for my mother benefits for death and they had the same date of being typed just one was on the mail Saturday and one on Monday. . I think it's a mistake and it should been fixed instead there just getting rid of me .i never got a formal letter saying when i was being tsken off.

  5. Employers should not have racially discriminating mind set. It has huge impact on the society what the big players do or don't do in the industry. Background check is conducted just to verify whether information provided by the prospective employee is correct or not. It doesn't have any direct combination with the rejection of the employees. If there is rejection, there should be something effective and full-proof things on the table that may keep the company or the people associated with it in jeopardy.

ADVERTISEMENT