On The Move

On The Move - 4/8/15

April 8, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been promoted or received an award.
More

On the Move - 3/25/15

March 25, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently been promoted, joined a new firm or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 3/11/15

March 11, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently been promoted, joined a new firm or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 2/25/15

February 25, 2015
IL Staff
Read who has recently joined an Indiana firm, been promoted or received an award.
More

On the Move -2/11/15

February 11, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined new firms, been promoted or appointed to a board.
More

On The Move - 1/28/15

January 28, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined a new firm, become partner or been appointed to serve on a board.
More

On the Move - 1/14/15

January 14, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently made partner, been appointed to a position or joined an Indiana firm.
More

On the Move - 12/31/14

December 31, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm, been promoted or appointed to a board.
More

On The Move - 12/17/14

December 17, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined a new firm, been elected to a board or honored for their service.
More

On the Move - 12/3/14

December 3, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been appointed to a board, been honored for his or her work, or opened a new firm.
More

On The Move - 11/19/14

November 19, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been appointed to a board or been honored for volunteer work.
More

On the Move - 11/5/14

November 5, 2014
IL Staff
Read who has joined Indiana firms or been appointed to committees.
More

On The Move - 10/22/14

October 22, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been honored for their work, or opened a new firm.
More

On The Move - 10/8/14

October 8, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's joined an Indiana firm, been appointed to a board or received an award.
More

On the Move - 9/24/14

September 24, 2014
IL Staff
Read about who's recently joined Indiana firms, been appointed as an officer or started a new firm.
More

On the Move - 9/10/14

September 10, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms or been elected to a board.
More

On the Move - 8/27/14

August 27, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's moved to a new firm, a new location or a new position recently.
More

On the Move - 8/13/14

August 13, 2014
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been appointed to committees or received an award.
More

On the Move - 7/30/14

July 30, 2014
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 7/16/14

July 16, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been honored or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 7/2/14

July 2, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been honored or elected to a board.
More

On The Move - 6/18/14

June 18, 2014
IL Staff
Read about who's joined Indiana firms or recently been honored.
More

On the Move - 6/4/14

June 4, 2014
IL Staff
Read about Indiana attorneys who have joined new firms, been honored or joined local boards.
More

On the Move - 5/21/14

May 21, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's joined Indiana firms, become partner, or been honored for their work.
More

On the Move - 5/7/14

May 7, 2014
IBJ Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, opened a new firm, or been honored for their work.
More
Page  1 2 3 4 >> pager
Sponsored by
2015 Distinguished Barrister &
Up and Coming Lawyer Reception

Tuesday, May 5, 2015 • 4:30 - 7:00 pm
Learn More


ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. The $320,000 is the amount the school spent in litigating two lawsuits: One to release the report involving John Trimble (as noted in the story above) and one defending the discrimination lawsuit. The story above does not mention the amount spent to defend the discrimination suit, that's why the numbers don't match. Thanks for reading.

  2. $160k? Yesterday the figure was $320k. Which is it Indiana Lawyer. And even more interesting, which well connected law firm got the (I am guessing) $320k, six time was the fired chancellor received. LOL. (From yesterday's story, which I guess we were expected to forget overnight ... "According to records obtained by the Journal & Courier, Purdue spent $161,812, beginning in July 2012, in a state open records lawsuit and $168,312, beginning in April 2013, for defense in a federal lawsuit. Much of those fees were spent battling court orders to release an independent investigation by attorney John Trimble that found Purdue could have handled the forced retirement better")

  3. The numbers are harsh; 66 - 24 in the House, 40 - 10 in the Senate. And it is an idea pushed by the Democrats. Dead end? Ummm not necessarily. Just need to go big rather than go home. Nuclear option. Give it to the federal courts, the federal courts will ram this down our throats. Like that other invented right of the modern age, feticide. Rights too precious to be held up by 2000 years of civilization hang in the balance. Onward!

  4. I'm currently seeing someone who has a charge of child pornography possession, he didn't know he had it because it was attached to a music video file he downloaded when he was 19/20 yrs old and fought it for years until he couldn't handle it and plead guilty of possession. He's been convicted in Illinois and now lives in Indiana. Wouldn't it be better to give them a chance to prove to the community and their families that they pose no threat? He's so young and now because he was being a kid and downloaded music at a younger age, he has to pay for it the rest of his life? It's unfair, he can't live a normal life, and has to live in fear of what people can say and do to him because of something that happened 10 years ago? No one deserves that, and no one deserves to be labeled for one mistake, he got labeled even though there was no intent to obtain and use the said content. It makes me so sad to see someone I love go through this and it makes me holds me back a lot because I don't know how people around me will accept him...second chances should be given to those under the age of 21 at least so they can be given a chance to live a normal life as a productive member of society.

  5. It's just an ill considered remark. The Sup Ct is inherently political, as it is a core part of government, and Marbury V Madison guaranteed that it would become ever more so Supremely thus. So her remark is meaningless and she just should have not made it.... what she could have said is that Congress is a bunch of lazys and cowards who wont do their jobs so the hard work of making laws clear, oftentimes stops with the Sups sorting things out that could have been resolved by more competent legislation. That would have been a more worthwhile remark and maybe would have had some relevance to what voters do, since voters cant affect who gets appointed to the supremely un-democratic art III courts.

ADVERTISEMENT