On The Move

On the Move-9/23/15

September 23, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm.
More

On The Move-9/9/15

September 9, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm.
More

On The Move-8/26/15

August 26, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently been appointed to a committee.
More

On The Move-8/12/15

August 12, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm.
More

On the Move-7/29/25

July 29, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm.
More

On the Move-7/15/15

July 15, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm.
More

On the Move-7/1/15

July 1, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's joined a new firm.
More

On the Move-6/17/15

June 17, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana law firm.
More

On the Move - 6/3/15

June 3, 2015
IL Staff
See who's recently joined an Indiana firm or been appointed to serve on a committee.
More

On The Move - 5/20/15

May 20, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined a new firm or received an award.
More

On the Move - 5/6/15

May 6, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's been promoted, joined a new firm, or received an award.
More

On the Move - 4/22/15

April 22, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm or appointed to serve on a committee.
More

On The Move - 4/8/15

April 8, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been promoted or received an award.
More

On the Move - 3/25/15

March 25, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently been promoted, joined a new firm or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 3/11/15

March 11, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently been promoted, joined a new firm or been appointed to a board.
More

On the Move - 2/25/15

February 25, 2015
IL Staff
Read who has recently joined an Indiana firm, been promoted or received an award.
More

On the Move -2/11/15

February 11, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined new firms, been promoted or appointed to a board.
More

On The Move - 1/28/15

January 28, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined a new firm, become partner or been appointed to serve on a board.
More

On the Move - 1/14/15

January 14, 2015
IL Staff
Read who's recently made partner, been appointed to a position or joined an Indiana firm.
More

On the Move - 12/31/14

December 31, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined an Indiana firm, been promoted or appointed to a board.
More

On The Move - 12/17/14

December 17, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined a new firm, been elected to a board or honored for their service.
More

On the Move - 12/3/14

December 3, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's been appointed to a board, been honored for his or her work, or opened a new firm.
More

On The Move - 11/19/14

November 19, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been appointed to a board or been honored for volunteer work.
More

On the Move - 11/5/14

November 5, 2014
IL Staff
Read who has joined Indiana firms or been appointed to committees.
More

On The Move - 10/22/14

October 22, 2014
IL Staff
Read who's recently joined Indiana firms, been honored for their work, or opened a new firm.
More
Page  1 2 3 4 >> pager
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
Subscribe to Indiana Lawyer
  1. @ President Snow, like they really read these comments or have the GUTS to show what is the right thing to do. They are just worrying about planning the next retirement party, the others JUST DO NOT CARE about what is right. Its the Good Ol'Boys - they do not care about the rights of the mother or child, they just care about their next vote, which, from what I gather, the mother left the state of Indiana because of the domestic violence that was going on through out the marriage, the father had three restraining orders on him from three different women, but yet, the COA judges sent a strong message, go ahead men put your women in place, do what you have to do, you have our backs... I just wish the REAL truth could be told about this situation... Please pray for this child and mother that God will some how make things right and send a miracle from above.

  2. I hear you.... Us Christians are the minority. The LGBTs groups have more rights than the Christians..... How come when we express our faith openly in public we are prosecuted? This justice system do not want to seem "bias" but yet forgets who have voted them into office.

  3. Perhaps the lady chief justice, or lady appellate court chief judge, or one of the many female federal court judges in Ind could lead this discussion of gender disparity? THINK WITH ME .... any real examples of race or gender bias reported on this ezine? But think about ADA cases ... hmmmm ... could it be that the ISC actually needs to tighten its ADA function instead? Let's ask me or Attorney Straw. And how about religion? Remember it, it used to be right up there with race, and actually more protected than gender. Used to be. Patrick J Buchanan observes: " After World War II, our judicial dictatorship began a purge of public manifestations of the “Christian nation” Harry Truman said we were. In 2009, Barack Obama retorted, “We do not consider ourselves to be a Christian nation.” Secularism had been enthroned as our established religion, with only the most feeble of protests." http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/is-secession-a-solution-to-cultural-war/#q3yVdhxDVMMxiCmy.99 I could link to any of my supreme court filings here, but have done that more than enough. My case is an exclamation mark on what PJB writes. BUT not in ISC, where the progressives obsess on race and gender .... despite a lack of predicate acts in the past decade. Interested in reading more on this subject? Search for "Florida" on this ezine.

  4. Great questions to six jurists. The legislature should open a probe to investigate possible government corruption. Cj rush has shown courage as has justice Steven David. Who stands with them?

  5. The is an unsigned editorial masquerading as a news story. Almost everyone quoted was biased in favor of letting all illegal immigrants remain in the U.S. (Ignoring that Obama deported 3.5 million in 8 years). For some reason Obama enforcing part of the immigration laws was O.K. but Trump enforcing additional parts is terrible. I have listed to press conferences and explanations of the Homeland Security memos and I gather from them that less than 1 million will be targeted for deportation, the "dreamers" will be left alone and illegals arriving in the last two years -- especially those arriving very recently -- will be subject to deportation but after the criminals. This will not substantially affect the GDP negatively, especially as it will take place over a number of years. I personally think this is a rational approach to the illegal immigration problem. It may cause Congress to finally pass new immigration laws rationalizing the whole immigration situation.

ADVERTISEMENT