June 19, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Revas
Spencer v. Tiffany Spencer
36A04-1211-PO-605
Protective order. Reverses denial of the agreed order dismissing an order of protection submitted by the Spencers to the
trial court. Since the word “shall” appears in the statute regarding the trial court’s actions when the
petitioner files for the dismissal of a protection order, the trial court didn’t have the discretion to deny the parties’
request to dismiss the protective order.
More
June 18, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Robert Yeftich, et al. v. Navistar Inc. and Indianapolis Casting Corp.
12-2964
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms dismissal of complaint filed by group of unionized workers alleging breach of collective-bargaining agreement
under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. The complaint lacked enough factual content to plead a plausible
claim for breach of the duty of fair representation, which is required to pursue this litigation.
More
June 14, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Jason
Findlay v. Jonathan Lendermon
12-3881
Civil/excessive use of force. Reverses District Court denial of summary judgment in favor of Deputy Sheriff Jonathan Lendermon,
holding that Findlay has not met a burden of proof showing a violation of a clearly established right when Lendermon grabbed
his arm to prevent him from picking up a memory card believed to contain surveillance video of Findlay’s admission of
trespassing.
More
June 13, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Re:
the Name Change of Jane Doe, Petitioner, Mary Doe, a Minor, and Baby Doe, a Minor
49A02-1211-MI-894
Miscellaneous. Affirms denial of mother Jane Doe’s petition to change her and her children’s names without publishing
notice of the change based on the evidence in the record and current law. Mother may be able to protect some information from
public record by going through Administrative Rule 9, but she did not choose to do so.
More
June 11, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Judson
Atkinson Candies, Incorporated v. Kenray Associates, Incorporated, Charles A. McGee and Kenneth J. McGee
12-1035, 12-1036
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann Jr.
Civil. Reverses District Court ruling that Judson Atkinson must demonstrate that it had been induced by fraud to enter into
the integration clause in a settlement agreement between it and Kenray Associates, as opposed to the agreement as a whole,
in order to circumvent the parol evidence rule. Indiana law does not impose such a bright-line rule.
More
June 10, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Javier Munoz
12-3351
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Criminal. Affirms 181-month sentence following a guilty plea in 2007 to distributing and possessing cocaine with intent to
distribute. Munoz materially breached the conditions of his release and an implied term of the plea agreement by fleeing the
country rather than showing up for sentencing.
More
June 6, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Scott
Speers v. State of Indiana
55A01-1208-CR-391
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony burglary and Class D felony theft. The trial court properly denied Speers’
motion for discharge under Rule 4(C) as much of the delay in bringing Speers to trial was attributable to him. The direct
examination of the lead detective did not present evidence in such a way as to crate an evidentiary harpoon.
More
June 4, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
City of Indianapolis v. Rachael Buschman
49S02-1210-CT-598
Civil tort. Affirmed trial court’s grant of summary judgment in Buschman’s favor and remanded the case for further
proceedings. Ruled that Buschman’s inclusion of information about her injuries does not restrict the scope of her claim.
Although she stated in her claim she did not suffer any injuries from an auto accident involving an Indianapolis police officer,
the amended statute governing the Indiana Tort Claims Act does not require a description of injuries. The court concluded
when the Legislature amended the statute, it intended to remove any pre-existing requirement of specificity in regards to
personal injuries.
More
June 3, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Jeffrey Weaver
12-3324
Criminal. Vacates judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana and remands for resentencing.
Weaver was sentenced to 235 months imprisonment after the District Court determined his sentence should be enhanced because
he was functioning as a manager/supervisor in supplying methamphetamine to two buyers and pressuring them to sell the drugs.
The Circuit Court found his actions did not rise to the 3-level enhancement because he did not have the control necessary
to coerce the buyers. Instead Weaver was encouraging behavior that would protect his investment and insure payment of the
debt owed to him.
More
May 31, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
Brian Scott Hartman v. State of Indiana
68S01-1305-CR-395
Criminal. Reversed and remanded a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress Hartman’s confession. Found Hartman’s
previous invocation of his Miranda rights was still in place when detectives questioned him days later because his earlier
request for counsel was unproductive which likely increased the coercive pressure.
More
May 30, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Daniel L. Delaney
12-2849
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
Criminal. Delaney’s argument that no reasonable juror could have failed to find that he acted in the heat of passion
when he killed his cellmate fails because there was considerable evidence of forethought, much of it emanating from the defendant’s
own statements. Judge Bauer concurs.
More
May 29, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jill
Finfrock a/k/a Jill Bastone v. Mark Finfrock
64A05-1209-DR-489
Domestic relation. Reverses award of attorney fees to Mark Finfrock. The award was based on perceived violations of the Fair
Debt Collection Practices Act, which is inapplicable because Finfrock’s arrearage of child support is not considered
“debt” under the Act. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining Jill Bastone’s request to
enter a qualified domestic relations order to attach to the entirety of her ex-husband’s retirement account. Remands
for further proceedings.
More
May 24, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Rebirth
Christian Academy Daycare, Inc. v. Indiana Family & Social Services Administration
49A04-1209-MI-467
Miscellaneous. Affirms denial of the daycare’s motion to dissolve and/or modify the order in the First Amended Agreement
Judgment between the daycare and FSSA. The trial court properly determined that Rebirth cannot employ LaSonda Carter pursuant
to I.C. 12-17.2-6-14 despite an earlier trial court order restricting access to her criminal record.
More
May 23, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Tommy
L. Morris, personal representative of the estate of Thomas Lynn Morris v. Salvatore Nuzzo
12-3220
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Vacates the dismissal of the claims of Tommy Morris against Nuzzo. The District Court erred in its determination that
Nuzzo was fraudulently joined. Remands with instructions the case be further remanded to the Trumbull County Common Pleas
Court of Ohio.
More
May 22, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Lydia
Lanni v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, et al.
49A05-1208-CT-392
Civil tort. Reverses summary judgment in favor of the NCAA on Lanni’s negligence claim. The trial court abused its
discretion when it denied Lanni’s April 20, 2012, motion for alteration of time. It effectively deprived her of a reasonable
opportunity to present any material made pertinent to a Trial Rule 56 motion. Affirms denial of Lanni’s motion to strike
the affidavit by the NCAA’s fencing championship manager, designated by the NCAA, that the NCAA was not involved in
the fencing match where Lanni was injured.
More
May 20, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. John W. Bloch, III
12-2784
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Affirms in part, reverses in part and remands. The court affirmed a conviction of firearm possession by a felon,
but found error in convictions of two counts under 18 U.S.C. Section 922 because the possession of two firearms arose from
the same incident. Ordered the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana to merge the convictions and resentence
Bloch on a single count.
More
May 17, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
State
of Indiana ex rel. Glenn D. Commons, et al. v. The Hon. John R. Pera, et al.
45S00-1303-OR-209
Original action/judiciary. Grants in part and denies in part relief sought by relators, Lake County magistrates, who sought
to prevent civil division Judge Nicholas Schiralli from transferring to the juvenile bench. The court held that Schiralli,
who had not been appointed to the bench through merit selection, may not transfer without first being appointed through merit
selection. The court denied the magistrates’ request that no judicial transfers be allowed without merit selection.
The court denied Lake County judges’ assertion that the Lake County merit selection statute in question, I.C. 33-33-45-21(e),
is unconstitutional.
More
May 16, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jason
Lee Sowers v. State of Indiana
08A02-1208-CR-640
Criminal. Reverses convictions of Class D felonies criminal recklessness and resisting law enforcement. The bailiff improperly
communicated with the jury foreperson, resulting in fundamental error. Remands for further proceedings. Judge Bradford dissents.
More
May 15, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Richard
J. Bond and Janet A. Bond, et al. v. Templeton Coal Company, Inc.
42A01-1209-PL-419
Civil plenary. Affirms summary judgment for Templeton Coal Co. on its complaint to quiet title to certain mineral interests.
Considering Section 2’s ambiguity, the rule to strictly construe acts in derogation of the common law, and the Mineral
Lapse Act’s underlying purposes, holds that Section 2 of the Act is limited in its retroactive application to only the
twenty-year period immediately preceding the effective date of the Act, or September 2, 1951.
More
Interesting that the new laws in criminal code all involve voter fraud
I'm getting divorced and we have prenuptial and judge said it stands even though he made me sign it 2 days before wedding then I be c ame ill and left with nothing butbills
No irony here, John. Conour’s clients are wise to him. Evidently you’ve missed discovery that disclosed Conour was aware he was caught with his hand in the cookie jar, actually many cookie jars, but continued to spend any monies he secured on himself and his lifestyle. Your theory is idealistic and assumes Conour has the soul of a good attorney and therefore he would take care of his clients. Conour has no soul. He greedily took awarded settlements from his disabled clients and spent it on his own edacious desires. You are naïve to think if he kept working he would put his fees into a restitution fund. He is who he is and has proven he will use any means to cheat and manipulate those who trust him and the judicial system that is supposed to protect them. Sorry John, you don’t send the fox back into the hen house after he’s caught devouring the hens. Conour can’t be trusted. He has no more honor than that fox.
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution