April 15, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jose Guzman v. State of Indiana
54A01-1209-CR-409
Criminal. Affirms eight-year sentence following guilty plea to Class C felony reckless homicide and the order Guzman pay
restitution to the accident victims. The trial court acted within its discretion in ordering the restitution and in sentencing
Guzman, and his sentence is not inappropriate.
More
April 12, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
David
R. Mertz v. City of Greenwood, Indiana
41A01-1206-MI-286
Miscellaneous. Affirms order denying Mertz’s petition to reverse the disciplinary action taken against him by the Greenwood
Police Merit Commission following an evidentiary hearing. Mertz has not met his burden to show that the trial court determination,
upholding the commission’s interpretation of the relevant ordinances, is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion,
or otherwise contrary to law.
More
April 11, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
Utility
Center, Inc. d/b/a Aqua Indiana, Inc. v. City of Fort Wayne, Indiana
90S04-1208-PL-450
Civil plenary. Reverses the judgment of the trial court granting the city’s motion to strike a jury request by Aqua
Indiana and remands this cause for further proceedings. Concludes that “rehear the matter of the assessment de novo”
within the meaning of Indiana Code 32-24-2-11(a) contemplates a new hearing with trial and judgment as in all other civil
actions. And where a party so requests, a trial by jury.
More
April 10, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kevin B. McCarthy, et al., and Langsenkamp Family Apostolate, et al. v. Patricia Ann Fuller, et al.
12-2157, 12-2257, 12-2262
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. The District Court’s denial of McCarthy’s motion that the court take judicial notice of the Holy See’s
rulings on Fuller’s status in the Roman Catholic Church is reversed, with a reminder to the district court that federal
courts are not empowered to decide (or to allow juries to decide) religious questions. The other two appeals are dismissed.
More
April 9, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Nancie
Cloe v. City of Indianapolis
12-1713
Civil/discrimination. Affirms District Court grant of summary judgment to Indianapolis on Nancy Cloe’s argument that
the city failed to reasonably accommodate her injury, but reversed and remanded the District Court’s summary judgment
against Cloe’s claims that she was discriminated against and faced retaliation for requesting a work accommodation be
made because of her disability.
More
April 8, 2013
Halden
Martin v. State of Indiana
73A01-1207-CR-300
Criminal. Reverses and remands a conviction of Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated. A toxicology department
witness’s repeated failure to appear for scheduled depositions was a delay attributable to the state, the court ruled,
finding that the delay caused a trial 476 days after Martin’s arrest, in violation of Criminal Rule 4(C).
More
April 5, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
Daniel
Ray Wilkes v. State of Indiana
10S00-1004-PD-185
Post Conviction. Affirms denial of post-conviction relief from a sentence of life without parole for conviction of three
murders, concluding that Wilkes did not meet his burden of proof on arguments that he was deprived of his rights to an impartial
jury and effective assistance of counsel.
More
April 4, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Betty
M. Jordan and Theodore R. Jordan v. Kelly D. Binns and U.S. Xpress Inc.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms jury verdict in favor of Binns and his employer U.S. Xpress on the Jordans’ lawsuit filed after Betty
Jordan lost both of her legs while riding a motorcycle and being hit by the tractor-trailer driven by Binns. Rejects claims
on appeal that improperly admitted hearsay evidence warrants a new trial. The court found that some hearsay evidence regarding
Betty Jordan’s statement that she was at fault in a motorcycle accident was improperly admitted, but it was cumulative,
and other evidence presented at trial strongly favored the defendants’ position.
More
April 2, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Koransky, Bouwer & Poracky P.C. v. The Bar Plan Mutual Insurance Co.
12-1579
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Judge William C. Lee.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for The Bar Plan and the denial of Koransky Bower & Poracky’s motion for summary
judgment on whether The Bar Plan had to represent the law firm or indemnify it on a client’s malpractice claim. The
law firm’s knowledge of the email exchange with the seller’s counsel in February and the Alabama declaratory judgment
action filed March 14 constituted knowledge of “any circumstance, act or omission that might reasonably be expected
to be the basis of” a malpractice claim by the firm’s client. The firm did not notify The Bar Plan in a timely
manner.
More
April 1, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc. v. Marsh Supermarkets, LLC
29A02-1201-PL-4
Civil plenary. Affirms judgment in favor of Marsh Supermarkets. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding
Marsh damages based on Roche’s rental obligation under the 18-year term of the sublease after Roche terminated it over
a subordination non-disturbance and attornment agreement. Judge Crone dissents.
More
March 29, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Phillip Jackson and Deborah Jackson v. Bank of America Corp., et al.
12-3338
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms dismissal of the Jacksons’ action to quiet title and claims that all or some of the defendants negligently
evaluated the Jacksons’ ability to repay the loan and that the loan contract was substantively and procedurally unconscionable.
The Jacksons can’t show that the institutions actually owed them a duty, and they failed to allege facts that would
support any unconscionability determination in Indiana.
More
March 27, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Terrence
J. Fuqua v. State of Indiana
02A03-1207-CR-342
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A felony dealing in cocaine, Class B felony unlawful possession of a firearm by a
serious violent felon, Class D felonies possession of a controlled substance and dealing in marijuana, and Class A misdemeanor
possession of paraphernalia. The investigating detectives had reasonable suspicion to search Fuqua’s trash, and the
subsequent search warrant was supported by probable cause. The trial court acted within its discretion when it admitted evidence
seized during the execution of the search warrant.
More
March 26, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
Teresa Meredith, et al. v. Mike Pence, et al.
Civil plenary/school vouchers. Affirms constitutionality of Indiana’s Choice Scholarship program, affirming a trial
court’s grant of summary judgment for state defendants in a suit in which plaintiffs claimed the voucher program violated
state Constitution provisions on education and religious liberties. The court held that the voucher plan is within the Legislature’s
power under Article 8, Section 1, and that the enacted program does not violate either Section 4 or Section 6 of Article 1
of the Indiana Constitution.
More
March 22, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
F.G.
v. B.G. (NFP)
49A05-1210-DR-506
Domestic relation. Affirms trial court’s denial of father F.G.’s motion to set aside decree establishing paternity
and for DNA testing regarding paternity of one of his children.
More
March 21, 2013
Todd
J. Crider v. State of Indiana
91S05-1206-CR-306
Criminal. Reverses in part the sentencing order that Crider’s habitual offender enhancement in a White County case
be served consecutively to the habitual offender enhancement in a case from Tippecanoe County. Concludes that the waiver of
the right to appeal contained in the plea agreement is unenforceable where the sentence imposed is contrary to law and the
defendant did not bargain for the sentence.
More
March 20, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
State
of Indiana v. I.T.
20A03-1202-JV-76
Juvenile. Dismisses state’s appeal from the juvenile court’s order rescinding its prior approval of a delinquency
petition filed against I.T. Concludes sua sponte that the state is without authority to appeal a juvenile court’s order
withdrawing its approval of the filing of a delinquency petition.
More
March 19, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Frontier Insurance Company v. J. Roe Hitchcock, Timothy S. Durham and Terry G. Whitesell
11-3510
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Civil. Affirms order the guarantors Hitchcock, Durham and Whitesell deposit with the clerk more than $1.5 million regarding
a surety bond issued by Frontier Insurance. The guarantors must keep their promise to post collateral on Frontier’s
demand.
More
March 18, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Carmeuse
Lime & Stone and Carmeuse Lime, Inc. v. Illini State Trucking, Inc.
45A03-1211-CC-462
Civil collection. Affirms the trial court order dismissing Carmeuse Lime & Stone’s and Carmeuse Lime Inc.’s
complaint in favor of Illini State Trucking, Inc. regarding indemnification. Illini did not waive its ability to raise the
forum selection clause with the court.
More
March 15, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles
Meriwether v. State of Indiana
49A02-1208-CR-676
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana and Class D felony possession of paraphernalia.
The trial court did not commit fundamental error when it admitted Meriwether’s statement into evidence because he was
not in custody when he made it.
More
March 14, 2013
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael Bowser v. State of Indiana
71A03-1208-CR-361
Criminal. Affirms two convictions of Class C felony battery by means of a deadly weapon. The trial court did not abuse its
discretion by denying Bowser’s motion for severance and there is sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions.
More
March 13, 2013
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kelly
S. Thomas v. Dushan Zatecky, superintendent, Pendleton Correctional Facility
13-1136
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Denies Thomas’ request that he be allowed collateral relief to file appeals without regard to the fees required
by Section 1913 and the resolutions of the Judicial Conference. Gives Thomas 21 days to file in the 7th Circuit a motion for
permission to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of appealability. Failure to meet this schedule will result in dismissal
for failure to prosecute.
More
March 12, 2013
Indiana Supreme Court
Curtis
A. Bethea v. State of Indiana
18S05-1206-PC-304
Post conviction. Affirms trial court denial of post-conviction relief, holding that Curtis Bethea, who pleaded guilty to
armed robbery and criminal confinement in a deal that dropped seven other felony counts, was not improperly denied post-conviction
relief when a judge considered evidence of charges that were dismissed.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.