March 31, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Antonio
D. Jones v. James Basinger
09-3577
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Terre Haute Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Remands with instructions to grant writ of habeas petition. Reverses District Court's affirmation that Jones was
not entitled to a habeas petition, citing U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in
Crawford v. Washington. States that
informant’s double-hearsay against Jones was used as substantive evidence to prove Jones’ guilt, violating his
Sixth Amendment rights.
More
March 30, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Tywan
D. Griffin v. State of Indiana
49A02-1007-CR-774
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor possession of marijuana, ruling the state proved beyond a reasonable
doubt that Griffin committed the charge.
More
March 29, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Edward
Dawson v. State of Indiana
49S02-1103-CR-176
Criminal. Rules that the Indiana Court of Appeals was correct in declining Edward Dawson’s belated appeal of the trial
court’s decision to revoke Dawson’s probation and impose a six-year sentence. States that the COA correctly decided
that belated appeals from orders revoking probation are not presently available pursuant to Post-Conviction Rule 2, as the
sanction imposed when probation is revoked does not qualify as a “sentence” under the rule.
More
March 28, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Scott
C. Cole and Jennifer A. Cole v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
10-2194
U.S. Tax Court, Judge Diane L. Kroupa.
Tax. Affirms finding that the Coles omitted more than $1.2 million of income and more than $1.3 million of self-employment
income from their 2001 joint tax return and that they fraudulently avoided tax liability. The Coles did not show clear error
in the Tax Court’s finding that because they did not produce credible documentary or other evidence showing otherwise,
that the commissioner’s reconstruction of their income was “reasonable and substantially accurate.”
More
March 25, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
William
Hurt v. State of Indiana
82A04-1006-CR-414
Criminal. Affirms Hurt’s conviction of Class C felony reckless disregard of a traffic control device in a highway workzone
resulting in death, ruling that Hurt had seen the traffic controls repeatedly on his several trips through the workzone, prior
to the fatal crash. Reverses Hurt’s conviction for Class C felony reckless operation of a vehicle in a highway workzone
resulting in death, on double jeopardy grounds.
More
March 24, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Rollie Mitchell
10-1831
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Criminal. Affirms sentence of life imprisonment for distributing cocaine base, stating the District Court properly calculated
the guidelines range and did not improperly consider Mitchell’s exercise of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel.
More
March 23, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Troy
R. Smith v. State of Indiana
35A02-1008-CR-996
Criminal. Reverses trial court’s order to revoke Smith’s probation due to non-payment of weekly child support
– a condition of Smith’s probation. The state failed to prove Smith knowingly, recklessly, or intentionally failed
to pay weekly child support and failed to prove Smith’s ability to pay.
More
March 22, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Robert B. Long and Jason P. Edwards
09-3493, 09-3636
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Criminal. Affirms Edwards’ convictions of one count of narcotics conspiracy, two counts of possession with intent to
distribute marijuana, and one count of attempted possession with intent to distribute marijuana. The government’s affidavit
in support of the wiretap established necessity. Affirms Long’s sentence for the same convictions, plus one additional
count of possession with intent to distribute marijuana.
More
March 21, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Darryl
Harris v. United Water Services, Inc.
93A02-1010-EX-1164
Civil. Reverses the decision by the Full Worker’s Compensation Board affirming the grant of United Water’s motion
to dismiss. Harris’ deposition testimony doesn’t support the board’s finding that he admitted that his condition
stemmed from a single incident and the board applied the wrong burden of proof. Remands for further proceedings.
More
March 18, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Dennis Jamison
10-1515
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Criminal. Affirms Jamison’s conviction of possessing a sawed-off shotgun, in violation of 26 U.S.C. sections 5861(d)
and 5845(a). During his trial, the district court permitted the government to elicit testimony from Jamison’s wife on
cross-examination regarding Jamison’s aggressiveness. Jamison appeals his conviction, arguing that the question and
his wife’s response were irrelevant, unfairly prejudicial, unduly cumulative, and lacked foundation. The government
claims that the evidence demonstrated Mrs. Jamison’s bias and motive to lie.
More
March 16, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Mark
Siliven, et al. v. Indiana Department of Child Services, et al.
10-2701
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms District Court conclusion that Terry Suttle, director of the Wayne County DCS, and case manager Amber Luedike
were entitled to summary judgment on the federal claims on qualified immunity grounds, finding the constitutional rights allegedly
violated were not clearly established in January 2008. Probable cause existed to remove C.S. from his father’s custody
so there was no Fourth Amendment violation. The use of state action to protect C.S. from his father was reasonable.
More
March 15, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Debra L. Walker v. David M. Pullen
64S05-1101-CT-6
Civil tort. Reverses grant of Pullen’s motion to have a new trial and remands for the trial court to reinstate the
original jury verdict of $10,070. The trial court judge only made general findings and not special findings as required by
Indiana Trial Rule 59(J). Justice Dickson concurs in result.
More
March 14, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
In Re: Gerald W. Davis Jr.; Linda Reeves v. Gerald W. Davis Jr.
10-2757
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s affirmation of the bankruptcy court ruling that Davis’ debt owed to Reeves was
dischargeable. There was no finding of fraudulent intent on Davis’ part, as is required for the application of 11 U.S.C.
Section 523(a)(2) to prevent Davis’ debt to Reeves from being dischargeable. The decision in United States v. Childs
forecloses a challenge to the reasonableness of the traffic stop.
More
March 10, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Paternity
of X.K.T.; J.L.H. v. B.L.T. (NFP)
67A01-1005-JP-212
Juvenile. Dismisses father’s appeal of the trial court order against him finding him in contempt for failure to pay
child support.
More
March 9, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Peggy
Abner and Linda Kendall v. Scott Memorial Hospital
10-2713
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Denies motion to file an oversized brief and affirms summary judgment for Scott Memorial Hospital in a suit under
the False Claims Act. Finds the appeal has no merit and the appellant’s attorney flagrantly violated the word limit
for the brief.
More
March 8, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Lisa
Gray v. State of Indiana
82A01-1005-CR-223
Criminal. Reverses Gray’s conviction of possession of marijuana as a Class A misdemeanor. She contended there was insufficient
evidence that she constructively possessed the marijuana. Judge Cale Bradford dissents, writing that Gray was in close proximity
to the marijuana and that it was in plain view, as officers had testified at trial.
More
March 7, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Martin Avila
09-2681
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David F. Hamilton.
Criminal. Affirms 365-month sentence for drug offenses following re-sentencing on remand. The District Court corrected the
drug quantity attributable to Avila. The District Court did not violate the cross-appeal rule and acted within the scope of
the remand.
More
March 4, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
In
Re: Rich Bergeron
10-3279
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Denies Bergeron’s petition for mandamus removing Judge Barker from
Eppley v. Iacovelli, pending in
the District Court. Bergeron is involved in that suit and was held in contempt for not removing web postings. Regarding Bergeron’s
contempt proceeding, Bergeron didn’t ask the 7th Circuit to stay the proceeding in the District Court and it’s
now too late to order the judge removed from the case because she’s through with it. The appearance of impropriety in
this case is too attenuated to justify that extraordinary remedy.
More
March 3, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Indiana
Association of Beverage Retailers, Inc. v. Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission, et al.
49A02-1002-PL-125
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers’ motion for a preliminary injunction
against the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission to enjoin the commission from issuing new beer dealer’s permits in
locations in which the statutory limits on the number of beer dealer’s permits have been met or exceeded. The Commission’s
interpretation of 7.1-3 is reasonable and doesn’t violate Title 7.1. The IABR also failed to show its members are likely
to suffer irreparable harm if no injunction is issued.
More
March 2, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
County
Council of Porter County v. Northwest Indiana Regional Dev. Authority, et al.
37A04-1004-CT-291
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment for the Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority and the denial of the council’s
motion for summary judgment on the council’s complaint seeking declaratory judgment it has the right to withdraw from
the RDA. Porter County cannot withdraw from the RDA and the council waived its argument that the original legislation establishing
the RDA Act is unconstitutional special legislation.
More
March 1, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Auto-Owners
Insurance Company v. Gary Hughes
18A02-1006-PL-659
Civil. Reverses and remands entry of judgment in favor of appellee-plaintiff Gary Hughes on his contract claim in the amount
of $166,792.83. Auto-Owners contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in denying its summary judgment motion on the
basis that Hughes’ suit was barred by a one-year limitation in the relevant insurance policy.
More
February 28, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
David E. Schalk v. State of Indiana
53A01-1005-CR-210
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A misdemeanor attempted possession of marijuana. Schalk arranged a drug buy to try
to discredit a witness against his client. An attorney is not exempt from criminal law even if his only purpose is the defense
of his client.
More
February 25, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brian Holtzleiter v. Angela Holtzleiter
48A02-1006-DR-736
Domestic relation. Reverses denial of Brian’s petition to modify child support. He hasn’t waived his argument
that he is entitled to modification of child support under the requirement that the current support obligation was 20 percent
different from what would be required under the guidelines and it had been at least a year since the support order was issued.
Remands for the issuance of a new child support order.
More
Judge Roger B. Cosbey is unethical and bias toward African American who seeks justice in Title VII claims. He disrespected and used his authority to attempt to intimidate me into taking an unfair settlement and when I refused he proceeded to get my case dismissed and to deny me my Constitutional and Civil Rights. He disobeying several rules of law; specifically, by ruling on summary judgment motions against the Fed. R. Civ. P., without authority of Judge William C. Lee, without consent of the attorneys, and with conspiracy to commit “fraud on the court,” as he conspired with my former attorney. He proved to me that he is bias, unethical, unfair and unfit to be reappointed. In my opinion, he should be disbarred in 2013, for committing fraud on the court, which would make him ineligible for reinstatement in 2014. See docket 3:07 cv 629 where he rules on dispositive motions, knowing magistrates are not vested with that power (especially without consent), grants the defendant an unconscionable number of extensions, accepts my former attorney request for extension for dispositive motion knowing he was working with the opposition, and unbelievably grants the defendant another extension after he requested an extension after he missed the deadline. I know another attorney filed charges against him for bias in race discrimination case(s). I know what he did in my case before he voluntarily recused himself, I just do not know how many other innocent people have been stripped of their rights because of him. I say shame on him and no more of the same.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.