December 15, 2010
Indiana Supreme Court
Joshua G. Nicoson v. State of Indiana
32S04-1003-CR-150
Criminal. Affirms five-year sentence enhancement for the use of a firearm following Nicoson's convictions of criminal
confinement with a deadly weapon as a Class B felony. Holds that adding these years is consistent both with the statutes in
question and with the prohibition against double jeopardy.
More
December 14, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Presbytery of Ohio Valley, Inc., et al. v. OPC, Inc., et al.
82A02-1003-MF-339
Mortgage foreclosure. Reverses summary judgment in favor of appellees-defendants OPC Inc. and others in a property dispute
between a local congregation and the national church. When the neutral principles of law approach is applied correctly, the
appellants prevail. Remands with instructions.
More
December 13, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Involuntary Commitment of G.M.
33A01-1006-MH-325
Mental health. Holds that the committing court’s conclusion for the basis of its order to commit G.M. –
that he was incapable of providing himself food, clothing, shelter, or other essential human needs - wasn’t supported
by the evidence. G.M. may be determined to be gravely disabled under another definition set forth in statute. Remands for
a review of G.M.’s care and treatment.
More
December 10, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
David Snowberger v. State of Indiana
09A02-1005-CR-570
Criminal. Reverses revocation of probation. Snowberger’s plea agreement to nonsupport of a dependent child required
the state to show his failure to pay child support to be willful and he has the ability to make payments before his probation
could be revoked. The evidence was insufficient to support the revocation.
More
December 9, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
American Bank v. City of Menasha, et al.
10-1963
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Order corrects sentence in original opinion from Nov. 29, 2010.
More
December 8, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Phillip Forman v. Wayne Penn, et al.
33A01-1007-CT-343
Civil tort. Dismisses appeal because it isn’t certified for interlocutory appeal or authorized as an appeal from a
final judgment pursuant to Ind. Trial Rule 54(B).
More
December 7, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
M.S. v. C.S.
03A01-1003-DR-140
Domestic relation. Affirms trial court’s order to vacate a previous order granting M.S. joint legal custody of and
parenting time with S.S., a child born to C.S., M.S.’s former domestic partner of more than 10 years. M.S. appealed
and raised three issues: whether the trial court erred in vacating its prior custody and visitation order; whether the trial
court abused its discretion by modifying custody of S.S. without a petition to modify or a showing of a substantial change
in circumstances; and whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying M.S. parenting time.
More
December 6, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Brian
D. Grigsby v. Ray LaHood, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Transportation
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the Department of Transportation in his suit claiming he wasn’t hired because of
his Native American heritage. Grigsby was not qualified for any of the positions he applied for.
More
December 3, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Marion County Auditor & McCord Investments v. Sawmill Creek
49A02-0912-CV-1192
Civil. Affirms order granting motion filed by Sawmill Creek to set aside a tax deed the auditor issued to McCord Investments.
Follows the holding of the U.S. Supreme Court in
Jones to agree with the trial court that the owner of the lot, Sawmill
Creek, wasn’t provided constitutionally adequate notice of the tax sale.
More
December 2, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Juan A. Corona-Gonzalez a/k/a Juan R. Ramirez
09-3993
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David F. Hamilton.
Criminal. Reverses sentence for drug convictions and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.
There is a substantial chance that the District Court’s misapprehension of whether Corona-Gonzalez was deported and
returned to the country illegally played a significant role in the adjudication of his sentence. Remands to allow the District
Court to reassess the sentence free of the factual misapprehension.
More
December 1, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
William R.D. Britt v. State of Indiana
02A03-1004-CR-253
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony robbery, Class D felony criminal recklessness, and Class A misdemeanor carrying
a handgun without a license. The trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in refusing to allow Britt’s counsel
to introduce evidence of his brother Brandon’s prior robbery conviction.
More
November 30, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Albert J. Hall v. State of Indiana
06A05-1003-CR-187
Criminal. Reverses conviction of operating a motor vehicle as a habitual traffic offender as a Class D felony. The trial
court committed fundamental error in its instruction on the mens rea element of the Habitual Traffic Violator Statute. Remands
for a new trial.
More
November 29, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
American Bank v. City of Menasha, et al.
10-1963
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Reverses judgment granting a stay requested by Menasha to give American Bank certain records available pursuant to
Wisconsin’s Public Records Law. The bank, a plaintiff in a class-action suit charging the city violated federal securities
law, requested the documents after the suit was filed. The stay is not a stay of a discovery order and can only be an injunction;
only a stay of discovery is authorized by the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998.
More
November 24, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Samuel Neal, Delores Neal and Hometown Transmissions, Inc. v. William J. Cure, et al.
49A04-0908-CV-468
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the Cures on the Neals’ claims of environmental contamination under the Environmental
Legal Act, nuisance, trespass, and negligence. The designated evidence does not, in light of the Cures' lack of involvement
in or knowledge of Masterwear’s actions, give rise to a genuine issue of material fact regarding the Cures' liability
for nuisance, trespass, negligence, or an ELA violation.
More
November 23, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Nightingale
Home Healthcare, Inc. v. Anodyne Therapy, LLC
10-2327
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker
Civil. Affirms the judgment of the District Court that granted Anodyne’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees
in the amount of $72,747. The award was based on 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), which allows attorneys’ fees to be awarded
to prevailing parties in Lanham Act suits, but only in “exceptional cases.” Nightingale contended no award of
attorneys’ fees was justified because the case was not “exceptional.” Also grants Anodyne’s motion
for fees and costs pursuant to Rule 38 of the appellate rules. Dismisses as moot Anodyne’s motion to strike Nightingale’s
brief and appendix.
More
November 22, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Levie S. Jackson v. State of Indiana
79A02-0912-CR-1230
Criminal. Affirms convictions of seven counts of Class C felony forgery, six counts of Class D felony theft, and finding
Jackson is a habitual offender The trial court did not err in denying Jackson’s motion to sever. Because he did not
present any explanation of how he was prejudiced by the timing of the additional charge, the trial court declined to reverse
the habitual offender enhancement.
More
November 19, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Florence R. Lacy-McKinney v. Taylor Bean and Whitaker Mortgage Corp.
71A03-0912-CV-587
Civil. Reverses summary judgment in favor of Taylor Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp. on its action to foreclose on Lacy-McKinney’s
mortgage that was insured by the Federal Housing Administration. Views the affirmative defense of noncompliance with HUD regulations
as the failure of the mortgagee to satisfy a HUD-imposed condition precedent to foreclosure. To hold otherwise would circumvent
the public policy of HUD. Remands for further proceedings.
More
November 18, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
David
N. Rain and Paramount International Inc. v. Rolls-Royce Corp.
10-1290
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms partial summary judgment in favor of Rolls-Royce on Rain’s claim for breach of contract by breaching
a non-disparagement provision in a settlement agreement after Rolls-Royce filed a Texas lawsuit involving Rain and Paramount.
Affirms the judgment following a bench trial on breach of contract in favor of Rolls-Royce after Rolls-Royce asked Rain to
leave an event.
More
November 17, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United States of America v. Rosalio Cruz-Rea and Zoyla Garcia-Rea
09-3591, 10-1355
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Criminal. Affirms convictions of and sentences of Cruz-Rea for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than
five kilograms of cocaine and possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, and convictions of and sentences
for Garcia-Rea for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than five kilograms of cocaine. The government didn’t
abuse its discretion in determining that the government laid sufficient foundation for an officer’s voice identification
testimony under Fed. Evid. Rule 901(b)(5). Affirms in all other respects.
More
November 16, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Kevin L. Hampton v. State of Indiana
84A04-1002-PC-122
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. There was no error in omitting the requested sentence
and appellate counsel did not fail to provide effective assistance.
More
November 15, 2010
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Lorenzo Tavarez
09-3879
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Criminal. Affirms convictions of two counts of distributing 50 grams or more methamphetamine. Tavarez failed to show that
the confidential informant was available only to the government. The District Court therefore did not err by refusing the
missing witness instruction. Concludes that the jury could reasonably reach its guilty verdict on the circumstantial evidence
presented here.
More
November 12, 2010
Indiana Supreme Court
In the Matter of William J. Rawls
49S00-0908-DI-355
Discipline. Disbars Rawls for violating Indiana Professional Conduct Rules 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a), 1.16(d), 8.1(a), 8.1(b),
8.4(b), and 8.4(c). Rawls has demonstrated a pattern of neglect of his clients' cases, resulting in adverse dispositions,
suspension of one client's driver's license, a missed opportunity to settle, and undue delay.
More
November 11, 2010
The courts are closed today in observance of Veterans Day.
More
November 10, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Scott D. Wells v. Herman Bud Bernitt, et al.
53A01-0910-CV-494
Civil. Affirms summary judgment in favor of the Bernitts on Wells’ claim against them for defamation because there
was no admissible evidence before the court to establish actual malice, an element of defamation. Affirms summary judgment
in favor of J.D. Maxwell and Travis Coryea as to Wells’ claim for negligent and intentional torts finding the evidence
establishes the officers didn’t use excessive force. Affirms summary judgment for Wells on the Bernitts’ cross
appeal alleging abuse of process.
More
November 9, 2010
Indiana Court of Appeals
Anthony A. Parish v. State of Indiana
02A03-1002-CR-74
Criminal. Affirms Parish’s convictions of murder, Class B felony robbery, and Class A misdemeanor carrying a handgun
without a license, and his sentence to an aggregate term of 86 years of incarceration. On appeal, Parish claimed a protective
search of a locked glove box during a traffic stop was constitutionally improper, and therefore evidence found during the
search should have been suppressed. COA concluded the protective search was permissible under the Fourth Amendment.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.