November 13, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
D.C. v. J.A.C.
32S04-1206-DR-349
Domestic relation/modification of custody. Reverses Court of Appeals ruling that overturned a trial court modification of
a custody order in favor of a child’s father. In a case involving a mother who was moving out of state, the Supreme
Court held that the Court of Appeals erred by failing to apply a highly deferential standard of review to the trial court’s
determination of a custody modification based on testimony regarding the best interests of the child.
More
November 8, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jerome Michael Burton v. State of Indiana
45A03-1201-CR-6
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to dismiss the charge of failure to register as a sex offender. Remands with instructions.
Wallace applies and the ex post facto provision of the Indiana Constitution prevents the application of Indiana’s Sex
Offender Registry Act to require Burton, a resident of Indiana, to register as a sex offender for an offense committed in
Illinois in 1987.
More
November 7, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Michael Kucholick v. State of Indiana
12S02-1211-CR-630
Criminal. Justices grant transfer and order Kucholick’s sentence for Class C felony criminal recklessness and Class
B misdemeanor criminal mischief revised to the advisory term of four years, all executed. Summarily affirms Court of Appeals
decision in all respects. Chief Justice Dickson dissents, believing the trial court’s sentence of seven years should
be affirmed.
More
November 6, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
State of Indiana v. Elvis Holtsclaw
49S02-1205-CR-264
Criminal. Reverses dismissal of state’s notice of appeal and remands to the Court of Appeals for consideration of its
merits, holding that the appeal is timely under Appellate Rule 9.
More
November 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Joshua A. Bostic v. State of Indiana
12A02-1202-CR-154
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Cass C felony attempted battery by means of a deadly weapon and criminal recklessness; Class
D felony arson; Class A misdemeanor criminal mischief; and Class B misdemeanor criminal mischief, holding that Bostic waived
his right to appeal under Criminal Rule 4(C) by failing to object to trial delays before the trial court. The court also found
he likewise waived his right to appeal the process for appointing a special judge. Remands to the trial court to correct the
sentencing order, abstract of judgment, and chronological case summary to reflect that Bostic’s 12-year habitual offender
enhancement is an enhancement to his sentence for felony criminal recklessness, and not a separate conviction.
More
November 1, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Leslie Bridges v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, Veolia Water North America Operating Service, LLC,
and The City of Indianapolis, Dept. of Waterworks
49A02-1112-CC-1097
Civil collection. Affirms trial court dismissal of Bridges’ class action filed after her water was turned off for nonpayment,
finding Bridges failed to exhaust the administrative remedies available at the Indiana Utilities Regulatory Commission. She
had to seek those remedies before seeking judicial relief. Concludes that I.C. 8-1-2-68 through -70 grant the IURC exclusive
jurisdiction over Bridges’ claim regardless of whether it is treated as a challenge to and request for reimbursement
of the reconnect fee or as a challenge to the allegedly improper act of terminating her residential water service in a manner
inconsistent with the terms of the tariff.
More
October 31, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Robertson Fowler v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-PC-68
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Fowler received a benefit at the time he entered
into his plea bargain, so he may not now challenge the sentence as illegal.
More
October 30, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Lisa J. Kane v. State of Indiana
30S04-1206-CR-372
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class D felony receiving stolen property and remands for retrial. The trial court improperly
instructed the jury on the mental state required to convict Kane.
More
October 29, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Betty J. Angel v. Kent H. Powelson and Marjorie A. Powelson
82A04-1205-PL-292
Civil plenary. Affirms order granting part of the Powelsons’ summary judgment motion on Angel’s claims of reformation
of a deed and adverse possession. The undisputed evidence shows that both Angel and the Powelsons were granted an easement
to use the roadway and both used it for ingress and egress purposes. The evidence also supports Angel’s claim for reformation
of a deed is barred by laches.
More
October 25, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Ken Nunn Law Office
49A02-1202-CT-68
Civil tort. Reverses denial of State Farm’s motion for summary judgment on the law office’s attempt to recover
attorney fees and remands for further proceedings. The law office may not seek payment of a former client’s attorney
fees from State Farm under an equitable attorney fee lien or based on a theory of quantum meruit.
More
October 24, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Leslie Ann Grider v. State of Indiana
48A02-1112-CR-1156
Criminal. Reverses 19-year sentence following guilty pleas to two counts of Class C felony forgery, four counts of Class
D felony theft, and two counts of Class D felony check fraud. The language of the plea agreement indicates the parties’
intention that the trial court would impose concurrent sentences on all counts regardless of the separate cause numbers. Orders
Grider’s sentences to be concurrent for a total of eight years.
More
October 23, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Planned
Parenthood of Indiana, Inc., et al., v. Commissioner of the Indiana State Department of Health, et al.
11-2464
Civil. Reverses in part and affirms in part, affirming the district court injunction against I.C. 5-22-17-5.5(b) that bars
state or federal funding for “any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions
are performed.” The circuit court held that Medicaid grants individual rights under federal civil rights protections,
but reversed the district court with regard to federal block grant funds, holding that no such actionable protection exists.
More
October 19, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Rodney Killebrew II v. State of Indiana
34A02-1204-CR-303
Criminal. Reserves a conviction of possession of marijuana after concluding the trial court abused its discretion when it
admitted evidence obtained at an illegal traffic stop. The court found the police officer had no grounds to stop the driver
because the continuous use of a turn signal is not a traffic violation and the officer’s actions did not fall within
his community caretaking function.
More
October 18, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
John A. Dugan v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-PC-50
Post conviction. Reverses denial of petition for post-conviction relief. The court erred when it denied Dugan’s claim
that Mills applied retroactively to his habitual offender enhancement. Remands for the court to vacate that enhancement.
More
October 17, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
J.M. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and T.C.
Agency appeal. Finds the court may rely on a different statutory ground of a just cause finding than the one relied upon
by the review board when, as here, the review board’s findings of fact clearly establish the alternate subsection’s
applicability. Affirms the review board under Indiana Code section 22-4-15-1(d)(5), that J.M. refused to obey instructions,
and was thus fired for just cause. Affirms denial of unemployment benefits.
More
October 16, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles Mitchell v. State of Indiana
49A02-1202-CR-125
Criminal. Affirms conviction and sentence for Class D felony theft. The evidence is sufficient to show Mitchell and the other
defendants knowingly exerted unauthorized control over the apartment complex’s water heater with the intent to deprive
the apartments of any part of its value or use. The advisory sentence imposed, with all but 60 days suspended to probation,
was not inappropriate.
More
October 15, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ted L. Cecil, Cecil Septic LLC, and Max Haas Company, LLC v. Fisk Excavating, Plumbing and Septic
Services, Inc., Dennis Fisk, Dennis Fisk, Jr.,Michelle Fisk, Bob Murphy, et al. (NFP)
33A05-1112-MI-686
Miscellaneous. Affirms summary judgment in favor of Fisk Excavating and other defendants on the plaintiffs’ legal malpractice
claim. Remands for determination of Gregg Morelock’s appellate attorney fees.
More
October 12, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeffrey Riggs and Mark Ashmann v. Mark S. Weinberger, M.D., Mark Weinberger, M.D., P.C., Merrillville
Center for Advanced Surgery, LLC, and Nose and Sinus Center, LLC
45A03-1109-CT-394
Civil tort. Reaffirms original opinion in all respects, and finds that a trial court when confronted with the facts and circumstances
like those in this case, may compel an involuntary psychiatric examination in accordance with Ind. Trial Rule 35. There is
no requirement that the court must do so.
More
October 10, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Charles
R. Kastner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
11-1166
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, Magistrate Judge William G. Hussmann Jr.
Civil. Reverses denial of disability benefits, finding the administrative law judge did not adequately explain why Kastner
had not met the requirements for a presumptive disability. Remands for further proceedings.
More
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.