October 5, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Heartland Crossing Foundation, Inc. v. Chris M. Dotlich
55A01-1203-SC-119
Small claims. Affirms judgment in favor of Dotlich on a breach of contract claim, holding that the trial court did not err
in rejecting Heartland’s claim for attorney fees assessed on the late payment of homeowner association dues. The trial
court had called an “administrative fee” assessed to Dotlich “nothing more than an abusive junk fee.”
More
October 4, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Angelina
Povey v. City of Jeffersonville, Indiana
11-1896
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the city on Povey’s claim that her termination of employment by the city animal
shelter violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and on her retaliation claim. Povey failed to meet her burden to demonstrate
that she was disabled under the ADA and is not protected by its provisions.
More
October 3, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Steven B. Steele v. State of Indiana
49A05-1202-CR-54
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress. Evidence Rule 617 does not apply in this case because the police officer’s
interrogation of Steele did not occur in a place of detention. The rule also does not explicitly or implicitly impose an affirmative
duty on law enforcement officers to transport a person to a place of detention before conducting a custodial interrogation.
More
October 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Moise Joseph v. State of Indiana
82A05-1108-CR-387
Criminal. Reverses convictions of Class A felony burglary resulting in serious bodily injury, Class B felony attempted armed
robbery and Class B felony criminal confinement. The trial court abused its discretion in admitting Joseph’s statements
to the police detective.
More
October 1, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Scott F. West v. State of Indiana
11A01-1203-CR-123
Criminal. Orders discharge of marijuana charges because West was held to answer those charges for more than a year without
a trial date while a motion to suppress awaited a ruling. West did not request an indefinite continuance such that he needed
to notify the court that he wished to proceed to trial.
More
September 28, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Steven Duncan v. State of Indiana
82A01-1201-CR-22
Criminal. Affirms in part and reverses in part six convictions of Class A misdemeanor cruelty to an animal. Duncan did not
knowingly waive his right to a jury trial because the court did not fully advise him of his rights and obligations. Finds
the animal cruelty statute is not vague as applied to him and there was sufficient evidence to overcome a defense of necessity.
Remands for a jury trial.
More
September 25, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Charles Hall v. State of Indiana
13A04-1111-CR-622
Criminal. Affirms conviction and aggregate 24-year sentence for convictions of dealing in methamphetamine, possession of
precursors, operating a vehicle after a lifetime suspension, and resisting law enforcement. The court held that a search of
the vehicle that Hall fled after leading police on a chase did not implicate the Fourth Amendment and that the sentence was
not inappropriate given Hall’s dangerous conduct and long record of driving and drug convictions.
More
September 24, 2012
I
ndiana Court of Appeals
State of Indiana v. Russell Oney
49A05-1204-CR-196
Criminal. Reverses and remands a trial court ruling that vacated a determination that a defendant was a habitual traffic
violator, holding that even though one of the predicate offenses later was vacated in post-conviction relief, the BMV’s
determination that Oney was a habitual traffic offender did not constitute manifest injustice.
More
September 21, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Justin Taylor v. State of Indiana
49A05-1201-CR-4
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class C felony failing to register as a sex offender. Rejects argument that ankle bracelet
alerted authorities Taylor was living at a different address.
More
September 19, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Michael Carpenter v. State of Indiana
85A05-1202-CR-57
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B felony conspiracy to commit dealing in methamphetamine. The police officers did not
violate Carpenter’s Fourth Amendment rights when they entered the house’s curtilage pursuant to an arrest warrant
and looked into the bathroom window. The officers also did not violate his rights under the Indiana Constitution.
More
September 18, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Marlon Sims v. State of Indiana (NFP)
49A02-1203-CR-183
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class C felony robbery, Class D felony criminal confinement and finding Sims is a habitual
offender.
More
September 17, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Fred
E. Dowell v. United States of America
10-2912
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Evansville Division, Chief Judge Richard L. Young.
Civil. Remands with instructions for the District Court to make a determination as to whether Dowell told his attorney to
file an appeal to contest whether he was a career offender. Dowell claimed his plea agreement specifically reserved his right
to appeal the career offender designation, but his attorney did not file the appeal.
More
September 14, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Alan
Kress and Randy Carr v. CCA of Tennessee LLC, doing business as Corrections Corporation of America, et al.
11-2950
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Larry J. McKinney.
Civil. Affirms order denying class certification regarding the reduction of daily pill calls for inmates and granting summary
judgment in favor of Corrections Corporation of America, et al., owner and operator of the Marion County Correctional Center.
There was lack of evidence of any ongoing constitutional violations.
More
September 13, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
An-Hung Yao and Yu-Ting Lin v. State of Indiana
35S02-1112-CR-704
Criminal. Cannot conclude that as a matter of law the defendants engaged in no conduct nor effected any result in Indiana
that was an element of either the theft or the counterfeiting charge. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying
sub silentio Lin’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The defendants’ airsoft gun is a written instrument
within the meaning of the statute and therefore reverses the trial court’s dismissal of the counterfeiting charges.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss the theft and corrupt business
influence charges.
More
September 12, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Dezmon Gaines v. State of Indiana
34A05-1201-CR-21
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress evidence. Indiana Code 9-19-19-4 is not void for vagueness and the officer’s
search of Gaines was reasonable. Judge Crone concurs in result.
More
September 7, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Robert
S. Filus v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
No. 12-1164
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. Magistrate Judge Roger B. Cosbey.
Civil/Social Security. Affirms denial of disability benefits, holding that substantial evidence supports the decision of
the administrative law judge.
More
September 5, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Cody B. Honeycutt v. State of Indiana
92A04-1203-CR-149
Criminal. Reverses denial of motion to dismiss charges on grounds that they were barred by the Successive Prosecution Statute.
Because the four charges were supported by probable cause and based on a series of acts so connected that they constituted
parts of a single scheme or plan, they should have been charged in a single prosecution.
More
September 4, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Nathan S. Berkman v. State of Indiana
45A04-1111-CR-583
Criminal. Affirms conviction of and sentence for murder. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in declaring a witness
unavailable or in admitting the deposition testimony of another unavailable witness. Berkman’s sentence is not inappropriate
as he had argued.
More
August 31, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Seabrook,
Dieckmann & Naville, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development and Monica Hilbert
93A02-1202-EX-100
Agency action. Reverses board’s conclusion that Hilbert’s employment was not terminated for just cause. Based
on the evidence and testimony, Seabrook Dieckmann & Naville showed that Hilbert breached a duty in connection with work
which was reasonably owed to her employer and her conduct was of such a nature that a reasonable employee would understand
that the conduct was a violation of a duty owed to the funeral home. Remands for further proceedings.
More
August 30, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Sung
Park v. Indiana University School of Dentistry, et al.
11-1933, 11-2109
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence.
Civil. Affirms dismissal for failure to state a claim in Park’s suit alleging equal protection and due process violations
and claims for state law breach of contract. She has no state law claim for breach of contract, and Park has not identified
a protectable property interest.
More
August 29, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Willis
Pryor v. State of Indiana
49A02-1202-CR-101
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A misdemeanor resisting law enforcement. Pryor’s trial counsel’s failure
to preserve his right to a jury trial denied Pryor effective assistance of counsel. Remands with instructions to vacate the
conviction and hold a new trial by jury.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.