April 4, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Melanie
Webster v. Walgreen Co.
55A01-1110-CT-442
Civil. Affirms judgment of trial court denying motion to amend the filing date of a complaint against Walgreen in order to
comply with the statute of limitations. The appellate court held that “mailing” for purposes of the Indiana Trial
Rules requires the sender to affix sufficient postage, and since that didn’t happen here the original complaint was
untimely.
More
April 3, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
William Minnick v. State of Indiana
47A05-1108-CR-448
Criminal. Minnick failed to establish that his right to speedy sentencing was violated. Reverses conviction of Class A felony
robbery and orders that it be entered as a Class B felony due to double jeopardy and that a 20-year and consecutive sentence
on this count be imposed. Minnick also failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request
for a competency hearing.
More
April 2, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Laenise
Arnett v. Michael J. Astrue, commissioner of Social Security
11-2424
U.S District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Robert L. Miller Jr.
Civil. Reverses decision by administrative law judge to deny claim for disability insurance benefits as the judge failed
to properly assess residual functional capacity. Remands for further proceedings.
More
March 30, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Kristine
A. and Larry G. Dawson v. Fifth Third Bank
49A02-1107-PL-704
Civil plenary. Affirms order denying the Dawsons’ motion for summary judgment and granting Fifth Third Bank’s
cross-motion for summary judgment on its claim for replevin. When Magish, who sold a motorcycle to the Dawsons, defaulted
on his loan from Fifth Third, the bank as the secured party had the right to take possession of the motorcycle.
More
March 29, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Ronyai
Thompson v. State of Indiana
49A05-1106-CR-323
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony dealing in cocaine. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied
Thompson’s motion to dismiss the charges against him. The court did not err when it granted the state’s peremptory
challenges as to the two African-American members of the venire. There was sufficient evidence from which the jury could infer
Thompson intended to exercise control over the cocaine.
More
March 28, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Juan
M. Garrett v. State of Indiana
49A04-1107-PC-410
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Because Garrett’s double jeopardy claims are
without merit, he was not prejudiced by his trial and direct appeal attorneys’ failure to raise these claims.
More
March 27, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Lorraine
(Carpenter) Miller v. Karl Carpenter
29A02-1107-DR-663
Domestic relation. Reverses the trial court’s grant of joint legal custody to father, holding the evidence does not
support modification of custody. Rejects the mother’s argument that the court made a de facto modification of physical
custody, holding the court merely modified parenting time, and holds the trial court did not abuse its discretion in reducing
the father’s child support obligations.
More
March 26, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Lavern
Ceaser v. State of Indiana
49A02-1106-CR-580
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s denial of Ceaser’s motion to dismiss, holding that her prior conviction for battering
the same child in the same manner similar to the underlying incident was admissible under the intent and lack of accident
or mistake exceptions to Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b). Further holds evidence at trial was sufficient to rebut her claim of
parental privilege.
More
March 23, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Troy
R. Smith v. State of Indiana
35S02-1106-CR-369
Criminal. Affirms trial court’s judgment to revoke probation for Troy Smith on grounds that he failed to pay weekly
child support as a condition of his probation. Justices disagreed with Smith’s appellate argument that state failed
to carry its burden of proof that his failure to pay was reckless, knowing or intentional.
More
March 22, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Sheila
Perdue, et al. v. Michael A. Gargano, et al.
49S02-1107-PL-437
Civil plenary. Reverses in part Marion Superior Judge David Dreyer’s ruling on challenge to Indiana Family and Social
Services Administration’s automated system of processing claims for Medicaid, food stamps, and temporary assistance.
Holds that the FSSA’s denial notices are insufficiently explanatory but that the agency may deny an application when
that person fails to cooperate in the eligibility determination process. Affirms in part the trial court’s grant of
Sheila Perdue’s summary judgment motion on the grounds that she’s entitled to reasonable accommodations in applying
for benefits but that does not necessarily require a caseworker or case management services.
More
March 21, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
State
of Indiana v. International Business Machines Corporation
49S00-1201-PL-15
Civil plenary. Holds that Indiana Code 34-29-2-1 – providing that the governor of the state of Indiana is “privileged
from arrest on civil process, and from obeying any subpoena to testify” – operates to preclude a trial court from
issuing an order to compel the governor’s deposition in a contract dispute brought by the state of Indiana against a
contractor. Justice Sullivan concurs in result.
More
March 20, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Estate
of Nicholas D. Rice, deceased, by Rick D. Rice and Diane J. Waldrop, co-personal representatives v. Correctional Medical Services,
et al.
http://media.ibj.com/Lawyer/websites/opinions/index.php?pdf=2012/march/GK0PUU3D.pdf
09-2804, 10-2389
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, Judges Robert L. Miller Jr. and Rudy Lozano.
Civil. In No. 09-2804, affirms in part and reverse in part the District Court’s entry of summary judgment in favor
of the defendants. A material dispute of fact precludes summary judgment on one of the estate’s Section 1983 claims.
In No. 10-2389, reverses the District Court’s decision to dismiss the state claims on the basis of collateral estoppel.
Remands both cases for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
More
March 19, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Jimmie
E. Jones, Jr. v. State of Indiana
29S02-1108-CR-511
Criminal. Adopts Court of Appeals opinion in full, which affirmed the refusal by the trial court to give Jones’ tendered
instructions on reckless homicide and involuntary manslaughter as lesser-included offenses to the murder charge. The evidence
didn’t support a reckless homicide instruction and the charging information for the murder count foreclosed an involuntary
manslaughter instruction.
More
March 16, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Harry
Foster III and Linda Foster v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
11-3100
United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springman.
Civil. Affirms District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, holding
the Fosters’ failure to produce requested documents was a material breach of their insurance agreement.
More
March 15, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Charlie White, et. al. v. Indiana Democratic Party, through its Chairman , Daniel J. Parker
49S00-1202-MI-73
Miscellaneous. Reverses a decision by Marion Circuit Judge Lou Rosenberg, which found that Charlie White was not eligible
to take office following the November 2010 election because he had improperly registered to vote at an address where he was
not living. Justice Brent Dickson concurred in result, but wrote separately to say that he agreed with the election contest
being dismissed because he sees the Legislature’s attempt to impose additional eligibility qualifications on candidates
as unconstitutional and not a basis to contest someone’s eligibility for office.
More
March 13, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Shannon
McComas v. Edward Brickley
United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
11-2138
Civil. Reverses District Court’s denial of Brickley’s motion for summary judgment. McComas filed suit against
Brickley for false arrest after the charges against McComas were dropped.
But Brickley claimed that he had probable cause to arrest McComas and qualified immunity in his role as a police officer.
The 7th Circuit agreed and held the District Court erred in its determination of qualified immunity. It remanded with instructions
consistent with its opinion.
More
March 9, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Anthony Raupp
11-2215
United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge Tanya Walton Pratt.
Criminal. Affirms District Court’s determination that Raupp was a “career offender,” due to a previous
crime of violence, and affirms 100-month sentence. Judge Diane Wood dissented, holding that the majority relied on a note
in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines that is for agency interpretation of its own rule.
More
March 8, 2012
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S.A
v. Marlon K. Spears
No. 10-3338
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division, Chief Judge Philip P. Simon.
Criminal. Affirms denial of motion to suppress evidence, finding that enough probable cause existed to justify a search warrant
that led to a man’s convictions on drug charges.
More
March 7, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Angela
C. Garrett v. State of Indiana
32A05-1105-CR-239
Criminal. Reverses Class A felony conviction of dealing methamphetamine, finding that the trial court should have instructed
the jury on a lesser-included offense of possession of methamphetamine. Remands for a new trial.
More
March 6, 2012
Indiana Supreme Court
Mark
J. Thatcher v. City of Kokomo, et al.
94S00-1109-CQ-570
Certified question. Indiana Code 36-8-4-7(a) applies to a member of the 1977 Fund who is receiving disability benefits and
who has been determined to have been recovered pursuant to 35 Indiana Administrative Code 2-5-5(c). And the time period during
which a person receives disability benefits under Indiana Code 36-8-8-12(e) does not count toward “years of service”
as that term is used in Indiana Code 36-8-4-7(a).
More
March 5, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brandy
L. Walczak v. Labor Works-Fort Wayne, LLC, d/b/a Labor Works
02A04-1109-PL-509
Civil plenary. Reverses summary judgment for Labor Works-Fort Wayne in Walczak’s suit for unpaid wages. Concludes that
the matter must be first submitted to the Department of Labor for resolution, so the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
over the claims until the DOL had made a determination. Remands with instructions to dismiss the complaint.
More
March 2, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Brian
Scott Hartman v. State of Indiana
68A01-1106-CR-264
Criminal. Affirms the denial of Hartman’s motion to suppress a statement he made to the police regarding involvement
in the death of his father. Hartman initiated further communication by asking whether the search warrant had been served and
whether anything had been found, and then told the detective that he wanted to speak with him.
More
March 1, 2012
Indiana Court of Appeals
Jeremy
K. Warriner v. DC Marshall Jeep a/k/a DC Marshall, Inc.
49A02-1106-CT-489
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment for the dealership in Warriner’s suit alleging the dealership is strictly
liable for the injuries he sustained in a car accident under the Indiana Products Liability Act and liable for negligent marketing
of an unsafe product. Holds a manufacturer’s discharge in bankruptcy does not prevent a trial court from holding jurisdiction
over that manufacturer. Judge Bailey concurs in part and concurs in result in part.
More
Never heard of remand to another state. How often does that happen?
I highly recommend Deanna and her team of professionals that serve the legal community. Great information and many thanks for sharing.
they are pushing these cases against lawyers too far. thought-crime.
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.