November 1, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Rose
Acre Farms Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co. and National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford
11-1599
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, New Albany Division, Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for the insurers on whether they have to defend Rose Acre Farms in the antitrust complaint.
The suit for which Rose Acre wants a defense makes no claim that the policy could be thought to cover.
More
October 28, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Rick Gillespie, Dawn Gillespie and Rick's Towing and Maintenance, LLC v. Frank B. Niles and Kathryn
Niles
49A05-1102-CT-70
Civil tort. Affirms denial of the Gillespies’ objection to the Nileses’ request for a pre-trial conference and
refusal to dismiss the action under Indiana Trial Rule 41(E). Affirms grant of summary judgment for the Niles and denial of
summary judgment for the Gillespies. The Gillespies failed to wait the required 15 days before selling Kathryn’s vehicle
at auction. The trial court erred by granting summary judgment against the Gillespies individually as the judgment should
be against Rick’s Towing only.
More
October 27, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Joey Jennings v. State of Indiana
53A01-1010-CR-541
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class B misdemeanor criminal mischief. The state presented sufficient evidence to prove that
he was the person who damaged another man’s truck. Reverses his sentence of 360 days probation in addition to 180 days
in prison with 150 suspended. Jennings’ term of imprisonment for the purposes of Indiana Code 35-50-3-1(b) includes
not only the 30-day executed portion, but also the suspended term. The trial court sentence caused him to serve more than
a year of combined imprisonment and probation, which violates the statute. Remands for the trial court to recalculate his
probation, not to exceed 185 days.
More
October 26, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Anthony D. Laster v. State of Indiana
02A03-1103-CR-91
Criminal. Affirms convictions of Class B felony burglary and four counts of Class B felony robbery, holding the trial court
did not abuse its discretion in denying Laster’s motion for continuance. Remands to the trial court to revise sentence,
holding that in light of the offender’s character and nature of offenses, a fully executed sentence on each count is
not warranted.
More
October 25, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Marlyn J. Barnes and Melvin B. Taylor
11-1261, 11-1602
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Criminal. Affirms the resentencing of Barnes to 292 months and Taylor to 188 months for conspiring to possess with intent
to distribute more than 5 kilograms of cocaine. The District Court’s analysis evinces the perception of fair sentencing
and reasonableness.
More
October 24, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Christopher Allen Buchanan v. State of Indiana
82A01-1103-CR-139
Criminal. Affirms sentence for Class B felony child molesting, holding that trial court did not err in calculating the amount
of credit time to which Buchanan was entitled and did not err in finding the age of the victim as an aggravator.
More
October 19, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Alan Massey v. State of Indiana
49A05-1012-PC-808
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Even though the jury was improperly instructed regarding
the elements of voluntary manslaughter, Massey wasn’t entitled to the voluntary manslaughter instruction because his
girlfriend’s words ending their relationship do not constitute sufficient provocation to induce sudden heat. He also
failed to carry his burden to show that the sentencing issue was significant.
More
October 18, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Bruce
Barton v. Zimmer Inc.
10-2212
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Zimmer Inc. on Barton’s claims for discrimination and retaliation in violation
of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and for interference with his right to reinstatement under the Family Medical
Leave Act. Barton’s ADEA claims fail for lack of causation and any available remedy. There is also no evidence of retaliation,
and he has no claim under FMLA because when Barton returned to work after his medical leave, the company assigned him equivalent
duties without regard to his medical leave.
More
October 14, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Cedric Tharpe v. State of Indiana
49A04-1101-CR-24
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony attempted murder. Tharpe didn’t show the judge who presided over his
case was biased or prejudiced, nor did he demonstrate his trial was unfair. The trial court didn’t abuse its discretion
in denying his motion for continuance and there is sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
More
October 13, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
George Michael True v. State of Indiana
39A04-1102-CR-37
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery. There was no serious evidentiary dispute about whether
the battery was committed in the presence of the children. Instructing the jury that it could convict True of a Class A misdemeanor
domestic battery instead of as a Class D felony improperly invited the jury to reach a “compromise” verdict. Remands
for proceedings consistent with the opinion.
More
October 12, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Julie Nunley, n/k/a Waldrath v. Jeremy A. Nunley
68A04-1105-DR-269
Domestic relation. Affirms that Jeremy Nunley is entitled to a reduction of his child support obligation due to the decrease
in his income due to his incarceration for Class D felony nonsupport of a dependent. Declines to create an exception to the
rules set forth in
Clark and
Lambert for individuals incarcerated for the crime of nonsupport of a dependent.
More
October 11, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Roger Loughry, also known as Mayorroger
10-2967
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence
Criminal. Reverses District Court’s decision to allow admission as evidence “hard core” pornography without
examining it or without explaining its reasoning under Rule 403. Holds that the material was highly inflammatory and held
only minimal probative value, but created extreme prejudice against Loughry. Remands to the District Court for proceedings
consistent with opinion.
More
October 10, 2011
The state and federal appellate courts are closed Monday in observance of Columbus Day.
More
October 7, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
James Fernbach v. State of Indiana
69A01-1103-CR-151
Criminal. Affirms 60-year sentence for two counts of Class A felony attempted murder, holding that the jury’s rejection
of Fernbach’s insanity defense was not erroneous.
More
October 6, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Putnam County Sheriff v. Pamela Price
60S01-1012-CV-665
Civil. Reverses trial court’s denial of the Putnam County Sheriff’s motion to dismiss Price’s negligence
action for failure to state a claim. A county sheriff’s department that neither owns, maintains or controls a county
road does not owe a common law duty to warn the public of known hazardous conditions upon the roadway. Justices David and
Dickson concur in result.
More
October 5, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeal
s
P.J. v. State of Indiana
49A05-1102-JV-121
Juvenile. Affirms restitution order following adjudication, after a guilty plea, as a delinquent child for committing what
would be Class B felony burglary if committed by an adult. P.J. waived his right to have the juvenile court inquire into his
ability to pay, as he has acknowledged such ability in his plea agreement.
More
October 4, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Saba Tesfamariam v. Moghes Woldehaimanot
49A02-1009-DR-1050
Domestic relation. Affirms decree of dissolution of marriage, which awarded father Moghes Woldehaimanot full custody of the
minor children. The trial court abused its discretion by failing to establish that mother Saba Tesfamariam’s interpreter
was qualified and by failing to administer an oath to the interpreter to provide an accurate translation. The failure to establish
the qualifications or to administer an oath is not a fundamental error, and the trial court’s errors in the instant
case were not fundamental.
More
October 3, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kristine
P. Purcell v. Bank of America
10-3975
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Civil. Reverses dismissal of Purcell’s common-law claims against the bank without prejudice to allow her to refile
in state court. Remands with instructions to enter judgment for the bank on all of Purcell’s state and federal claims.
Section 1681t(b)(1)(F) and Section 16811h(e)of 15 U.S.C. are compatible, and Section 1681(t)(b) would preempt Purcell’s
state-law theories.
More
September 30, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Franklin Electric Company, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce
Development
93S02-1102-EX-89
Agency appeal. Affirms determination of the liability administrative law judge that Franklin Electric Co. and its two newly
created entities Franklin Electric Manufacturing and Franklin Electric Sales are a single employer. The manufacturing and
sales entities did not acquire a distinct and segregable portion of Franklin Electric’s business, so they did not qualify
as “employers” under the laws governing Indiana’s unemployment compensation arrangements.
More
September 29, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Cedar
Farm, Harrison County Inc. v. Louisville Gas and Electric Co.
10-2234
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David F. Hamilton.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Louisville Gas and Electric on Cedar Farm’s attempt to eject Louisville Gas and
Electric from its property and to terminate an oil and gas lease for violations of certain portions of the lease. The lease
allows for a damages remedy and Cedar Farm hasn’t show that damages are inadequate to compensate for the harm to its
property.
More
September 28, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Desmond Turner v. State of Indiana
49S00-0912-CR-565
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, criminal confinement, robbery and burglary, and the sentence of life in prison without
parole for the murder convictions, plus a term of years for the other convictions. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
in permitting firearms and tool mark examiner Michael Putzek’s testimony, and the admission of challenged testimony
did not violate Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b). The trial court erred in admitting testimony on a statement made by Turner’s
mother, but that does not require reversal.
More
vagueness cannot challenged, so let's write all laws vaguely and throw the constitution out the window.Even if the court is operating under a particular law, if they don't it they will change it to their liking. What a joke!!!
Two convictions becomes one conviction with exactly the same sentence, only it is not clear wheter or not that sentence will be 18 months, 120 months or 138 months. Actually if the guns were in a home, whether or not they were his, he is protected under the 2nd amendment. Jurors need to learn the law and the constitution before judging others. The cour5ts need to do this as well.
With all due respect, Rick, I think you probably would be making a mistake by going to law school. The job market for attorneys is so saturated, you may well find yourself unemployed and with a lot of debt. You mention law would be a good supplement to your skills. True. But employers unfortunately don't value that. You will find that a law degree may well pigeonhole you into an attorney slot and limit career options. If you have a good job now I would hold onto that. As an attorney, you may well end up making less with the aforementioned debt.
Jack, I was only responding to bill's comment of tying everybody in government together. I agree with you though, it takes one bad apple to ruin the bunch.. As in any profession. What's truly unfair is when somebody violates someone's trust and takes complete advantage of someone
John’s comment is unfair. The majority of attorneys can be trusted. Unfortunately, all it takes is one greedy, unscrupulous, immoral attorney to jade the public.