October 19, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Alan Massey v. State of Indiana
49A05-1012-PC-808
Post conviction. Affirms denial of petition for post-conviction relief. Even though the jury was improperly instructed regarding
the elements of voluntary manslaughter, Massey wasn’t entitled to the voluntary manslaughter instruction because his
girlfriend’s words ending their relationship do not constitute sufficient provocation to induce sudden heat. He also
failed to carry his burden to show that the sentencing issue was significant.
More
October 18, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Bruce
Barton v. Zimmer Inc.
10-2212
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge Theresa L. Springmann.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Zimmer Inc. on Barton’s claims for discrimination and retaliation in violation
of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and for interference with his right to reinstatement under the Family Medical
Leave Act. Barton’s ADEA claims fail for lack of causation and any available remedy. There is also no evidence of retaliation,
and he has no claim under FMLA because when Barton returned to work after his medical leave, the company assigned him equivalent
duties without regard to his medical leave.
More
October 14, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Cedric Tharpe v. State of Indiana
49A04-1101-CR-24
Criminal. Affirms conviction of Class A felony attempted murder. Tharpe didn’t show the judge who presided over his
case was biased or prejudiced, nor did he demonstrate his trial was unfair. The trial court didn’t abuse its discretion
in denying his motion for continuance and there is sufficient evidence to support his conviction.
More
October 13, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
George Michael True v. State of Indiana
39A04-1102-CR-37
Criminal. Reverses conviction of Class A misdemeanor domestic battery. There was no serious evidentiary dispute about whether
the battery was committed in the presence of the children. Instructing the jury that it could convict True of a Class A misdemeanor
domestic battery instead of as a Class D felony improperly invited the jury to reach a “compromise” verdict. Remands
for proceedings consistent with the opinion.
More
October 12, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Julie Nunley, n/k/a Waldrath v. Jeremy A. Nunley
68A04-1105-DR-269
Domestic relation. Affirms that Jeremy Nunley is entitled to a reduction of his child support obligation due to the decrease
in his income due to his incarceration for Class D felony nonsupport of a dependent. Declines to create an exception to the
rules set forth in
Clark and
Lambert for individuals incarcerated for the crime of nonsupport of a dependent.
More
October 11, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
United
States of America v. Roger Loughry, also known as Mayorroger
10-2967
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge William T. Lawrence
Criminal. Reverses District Court’s decision to allow admission as evidence “hard core” pornography without
examining it or without explaining its reasoning under Rule 403. Holds that the material was highly inflammatory and held
only minimal probative value, but created extreme prejudice against Loughry. Remands to the District Court for proceedings
consistent with opinion.
More
October 10, 2011
The state and federal appellate courts are closed Monday in observance of Columbus Day.
More
October 7, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
James Fernbach v. State of Indiana
69A01-1103-CR-151
Criminal. Affirms 60-year sentence for two counts of Class A felony attempted murder, holding that the jury’s rejection
of Fernbach’s insanity defense was not erroneous.
More
October 6, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Putnam County Sheriff v. Pamela Price
60S01-1012-CV-665
Civil. Reverses trial court’s denial of the Putnam County Sheriff’s motion to dismiss Price’s negligence
action for failure to state a claim. A county sheriff’s department that neither owns, maintains or controls a county
road does not owe a common law duty to warn the public of known hazardous conditions upon the roadway. Justices David and
Dickson concur in result.
More
October 5, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeal
s
P.J. v. State of Indiana
49A05-1102-JV-121
Juvenile. Affirms restitution order following adjudication, after a guilty plea, as a delinquent child for committing what
would be Class B felony burglary if committed by an adult. P.J. waived his right to have the juvenile court inquire into his
ability to pay, as he has acknowledged such ability in his plea agreement.
More
October 4, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Saba Tesfamariam v. Moghes Woldehaimanot
49A02-1009-DR-1050
Domestic relation. Affirms decree of dissolution of marriage, which awarded father Moghes Woldehaimanot full custody of the
minor children. The trial court abused its discretion by failing to establish that mother Saba Tesfamariam’s interpreter
was qualified and by failing to administer an oath to the interpreter to provide an accurate translation. The failure to establish
the qualifications or to administer an oath is not a fundamental error, and the trial court’s errors in the instant
case were not fundamental.
More
October 3, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Kristine
P. Purcell v. Bank of America
10-3975
U.S. District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division, Judge James T. Moody.
Civil. Reverses dismissal of Purcell’s common-law claims against the bank without prejudice to allow her to refile
in state court. Remands with instructions to enter judgment for the bank on all of Purcell’s state and federal claims.
Section 1681t(b)(1)(F) and Section 16811h(e)of 15 U.S.C. are compatible, and Section 1681(t)(b) would preempt Purcell’s
state-law theories.
More
September 30, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Franklin Electric Company, Inc. v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce
Development
93S02-1102-EX-89
Agency appeal. Affirms determination of the liability administrative law judge that Franklin Electric Co. and its two newly
created entities Franklin Electric Manufacturing and Franklin Electric Sales are a single employer. The manufacturing and
sales entities did not acquire a distinct and segregable portion of Franklin Electric’s business, so they did not qualify
as “employers” under the laws governing Indiana’s unemployment compensation arrangements.
More
September 29, 2011
7th Circuit Court of Appeals
Cedar
Farm, Harrison County Inc. v. Louisville Gas and Electric Co.
10-2234
U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, Judge David F. Hamilton.
Civil. Affirms summary judgment for Louisville Gas and Electric on Cedar Farm’s attempt to eject Louisville Gas and
Electric from its property and to terminate an oil and gas lease for violations of certain portions of the lease. The lease
allows for a damages remedy and Cedar Farm hasn’t show that damages are inadequate to compensate for the harm to its
property.
More
September 28, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Desmond Turner v. State of Indiana
49S00-0912-CR-565
Criminal. Affirms convictions of murder, criminal confinement, robbery and burglary, and the sentence of life in prison without
parole for the murder convictions, plus a term of years for the other convictions. The trial court did not abuse its discretion
in permitting firearms and tool mark examiner Michael Putzek’s testimony, and the admission of challenged testimony
did not violate Indiana Evidence Rule 404(b). The trial court erred in admitting testimony on a statement made by Turner’s
mother, but that does not require reversal.
More
September 26, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
Angela K. Farno v. Ansure Mortuaries of Indiana, LLC, et al.
41A05-1002-PL-104
Civil plenary. Affirms denial of Farno’s motion for class certification on superiority grounds regarding the alleged
looting of cemetery trusts that had been funded from proceeds of purchases of pre-need burial services. The trial court did
not err in finding the receiver’s action provided a superior method to recovery any of the missing trust funds.
More
September 22, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
An-Hung Yao and Yu-Ting Lin v. State of Indiana
35A02-1006-CR-678
Criminal. Affirms order dismissing the Class D felony counterfeiting charges against Yao and Lin and reverses the denial
of their motion to dismiss counts of Class D felony theft and Class C felony corrupt business influence. The trial court lacked
territorial jurisdiction because there is no evidence any conduct that is an element of the alleged offenses occurred in Indiana.
Remands for the trial court to dismiss the remaining charges.
More
September 20, 2011
Indiana Supreme Court
Rod L. Avery and Marshall K. Avery v. Trina R. Avery
49S05-1102-PL-76
Civil plenary. Affirms default judgment entered against Rod and Marshall Avery. The Indiana Trial Rules apply to will contest
actions, and the failure to file an answer or responsive pleading in accordance with Trial Rule 7 may result in a default
judgment.
More
September 19, 2011
Indiana Court of Appeals
John Haegert v. Margaret McMullan
82A04-1008-CT-470
Civil tort. Affirms summary judgment for Margaret McMullan in John Haegert’s action alleging defamation, tortious breach
of his employment contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Haegert failed to show how he was injured by
the contents of McMullan’s file as his termination was based only upon an incident involving McMullan. There is not
properly designated evidence in the record that McMullan intended to cause Haegert emotional distress.
More
The court of appeals not only tries to rewrite or interpret the law to suit their fancy, now they choose play stupid as well. Every consideration must be given to pro se litigants, who are not held to the same standards as attorneys, as stated by,SCOTUS. I assume they didn't have a lawyer, since one wasn't mentioned and I strongly suggest thatb the rest of the, origional petitioners get back in there and fight for their rights.
the irony of situations like this is that the clients whom conour cheated are the ones who should be pulling hardest for him to remain free and keep his law license, so they have some hopes of him paying back. really bury the guy deep and then there will be little hope of restitution
Qualified immunity, means that if you wear a badge, you are exempt from law and free to do anything you please! The courts will back badge toting individuals, because they think they are above the law as well. They think, they have judicial immunity, they do not.
Deeply, deeply concerned? I'll bet if it was the judge's money that had been swindled we'd see deep concern with actual consequences. First a Ponzi scheme, then a shell game with the assets…c'mon, hasn't Conour abused the judicial system and his clients long enough? I say enough already.
Wow, just wow.